On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:46:12PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 6 Nov 2002 09:47:28 -0800),
>jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
> > > Please apply my IPv6 ACL patch.
> > > This is very important for ipv6-enabled environment.
> > >
> >
> > Rsync CVS has been stable for about 2 months. This appears
> > to be new functionality. We make the release and then you
> > can argue for inclusion in 2.5.7. This patch has had no
> > discussion or justification.
>
> Are there any "feature freeze" or "code freeze"?
> Or,... how about put it in "patches" directory?
Things having been stable this is about the most painless
point to do a release. I don't have control but the patches
dir would be reasonable.
>
> > Your earlier posting is the first i had heard of an IPv6
> > ACL. I've heard of ACLs for filesystems and for system
> > resources but not for a networking layer such that a normal
> > networking program would need to know about.
> >
> > Next time you submit your patch (in it's own thread) please
> > include a paragraph or two illuminating us IPv4 paupers what
> > it is. I'm guessing it does have to do with rsyncd but it
> > seems odd to me there would be no changes in rsyncd.conf.
>
> The word "ACL" could be confusing.
>
> It just add IPv6 support for "hosts allow" and "hosts deny" derectives.
> For example,
>
> hosts allow = xxxx:yyyy:zzzz:aaaa:bbbb:cccc:dddd:eeee
> or
> hosts allow = xxxx:yyyy:zzzz:aaaa::/64
> or
> hosts allow = xxxx:yyyy:zzzz:aaaa::/ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
Very good. IPv6 hosts allow/deny specification.
The patch should include documentation additions.
--
________________________________________________________________
J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies
email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember Cernan and Schmitt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
