[Bug 12472] invalid rsync-command syntax or options with —stats

2020-07-26 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12472 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 10738] report --stats output when termination signal arrives

2020-06-07 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
Davison --- We don't have all the stats info to output until the end of the run exchanges data between the procs (there are 3 processes in the transfer, and some of the processes don't have access to the data until the end). For instance, since the receiver is the only process on the receivi

[Bug 10738] report --stats output when termination signal arrives

2020-06-01 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10738 --- Comment #7 from Ben RUBSON --- Don't know whether or not this could be closed, thanks to "kill -USR2 ". For the stats bug, let's refer to the whole report https://github.com/WayneD/rsync/issues/7. -- You are receiving th

[Bug 13953] New: error message instead of --stats informations (in case of vanished files), using rsync 3.1.1 and rsync 3.0.9

2019-05-16 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13953 Bug ID: 13953 Summary: error message instead of --stats informations (in case of vanished files), using rsync 3.1.1 and rsync 3.0.9 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware

[Bug 10738] report --stats output when termination signal arrives

2017-05-26 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10738 --- Comment #6 from Ben RUBSON --- Mmmh however some of the statistics seem to be wrongly calculated. ### Example with tsync 3.1.2 : Number of files: 8,732 (reg: 7,568, dir: 1,163, link: 1) Number of created files: 1,232 (reg: 1,187, dir: 45) Num

[Bug 10738] report --stats output when termination signal arrives

2017-05-26 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10738 --- Comment #5 from Ben RUBSON --- So I just went through the code and found that this feature request is already implemented. We just have to use SIGUSR2 and rsync will stop, displaying stats. kill -USR2 Perfect ! -- You are receiving this

[Bug 10738] report --stats output when termination signal arrives

2017-05-24 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
RUBSON --- Hello, I'm facing this "issue" too, I really would like to have stats displayed when rsync receives a termination signal. Sometimes rsync runs all night long and is killed in the morning to save bandwidth, would then really be interesting to have stats to help with

Re: script showing extended stats ( deleted/added ...)

2016-12-17 Thread Kevin Korb
On 12/17/2016 05:36 PM, devz...@web.de wrote: > for pre 3.0.9 which is still standard in centos7 with recent updates, > --stats does neither show number of deleted, nor added files And it never will. If you want new features (even new security features) you don't want CentOS.

Re: script showing extended stats ( deleted/added ...)

2016-12-17 Thread devzero
for pre 3.0.9 which is still standard in centos7 with recent updates, --stats does neither show number of deleted, nor added files Am 17. Dezember 2016 18:06:56 MEZ, schrieb Kevin Korb : >--stats has most of that information in it. > >On 12/17/2016 08:01 AM, devz...@web.de wrote: >

Re: script showing extended stats ( deleted/added ...)

2016-12-17 Thread Kevin Korb
--stats has most of that information in it. On 12/17/2016 08:01 AM, devz...@web.de wrote: > is there a script which analyses rsync output with --itemize-changes ? > > i.e. i would like to have extended information on number of deleted files, > created directories, changed files

script showing extended stats ( deleted/added ...)

2016-12-17 Thread devzero
is there a script which analyses rsync output with --itemize-changes ? i.e. i would like to have extended information on number of deleted files, created directories, changed files i know rsync 3.1.x is better with this, but it`s still not in centos 5/6/7 and i don`t want to update tons of

[Bug 12472] invalid rsync-command syntax or options with —stats

2016-12-16 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12472 --- Comment #3 from rutleco...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Paul Slootman from comment #1) Also, no error when the server side is 3.1.2, only when the server side is 3.0.9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

[Bug 12472] invalid rsync-command syntax or options with —stats

2016-12-16 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12472 --- Comment #2 from rutleco...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Paul Slootman from comment #1) For the bug reporter, not in my rsync command. (My rsync command is the same script that I used w/o error with 3.0.9) I think the error has something to do wit

[Bug 12472] invalid rsync-command syntax or options with —stats

2016-12-16 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12472 --- Comment #1 from Paul Slootman --- Did you cut&paste the --stats from some webpage? As you can see from the emailed version of your report: Summary: invalid rsync-command syntax or options with â\200\224stats There's your problem! Y

[Bug 12472] New: invalid rsync-command syntax or options with —stats

2016-12-16 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12472 Bug ID: 12472 Summary: invalid rsync-command syntax or options with —stats Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity

[Bug 10738] New: report --stats output when termination signal arrives (fwd)

2014-07-24 Thread Robert Bell
Folks, I would find the output of -stats information to be useful when rsync fails. Typically, we use rsync to do backups, and if an rsync fails, we'd like to know how much data has been transferred in the failed run, to report on our internal web page for the backups, and to make estimat

[Bug 10738] report --stats output when termination signal arrives

2014-07-24 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10738 --- Comment #3 from Mark Smith 2014-07-24 22:50:06 UTC --- markie likes the SIGUSR1 idea too and it has precedents with dd as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail beca

[Bug 10738] report --stats output when termination signal arrives

2014-07-24 Thread samba-bugs
ability to get current --stats output with a sigusr1 without actually ending the rsync run. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid

[Bug 10738] report --stats output when termination signal arrives

2014-07-24 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10738 --- Comment #1 from roland 2014-07-24 21:44:38 UTC --- this sounds really useful ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. -

[Bug 10738] New: report --stats output when termination signal arrives

2014-07-23 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10738 Summary: report --stats output when termination signal arrives Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

Deleted files stats

2014-06-22 Thread Marian Marinov
Hi guys, we need a way to see how much bytes were removed when using the --delete option. We have some patches for that functionality but they are not complete (currently not including symlink stats). Would any of you be interested in looking at them and helping us polish them, so they can be

[Bug 10580] Total file size reported wrong with --stats --info=progress2

2014-05-26 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10580 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Wayne Davison

[Bug 10580] Total file size reported wrong with --stats --info=progress2

2014-05-01 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10580 --- Comment #3 from Vania Toperich 2014-05-01 15:03:25 UTC --- I am using --include-files and list is created automatically. Here is an example: /home/media/Movies/Джек Николсон/Беспечный ездок 1969 /home/media/Movies/Джек Николсон/Беспечный ездо

[Bug 10580] Total file size reported wrong with --stats --info=progress2

2014-05-01 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10580 Vania Toperich changed: What|Removed |Added Version|3.1.0 |3.1.1 --- Comment #2 from Vania Toperich

[Bug 10580] Total file size reported wrong with --stats --info=progress2

2014-05-01 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10580 --- Comment #1 from Vania Toperich 2014-05-01 13:10:53 UTC --- ls -la /home/media/Movies/Джек\ Николсон/Томми\ 1975/ total 1529336 drwxr-xr-x 2 media media 4096 Aug 20 2011 . drwxr-xr-x 14 media media 4096 Mar 13 12:07 .. -r-xr--r-- 1

[Bug 10580] New: Total file size reported wrong with --stats --info=progress2

2014-05-01 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10580 Summary: Total file size reported wrong with --stats --info=progress2 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity

[Bug 10220] symlinks are not counted as files in --stats

2013-10-28 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10220 --- Comment #4 from Ivan Dimitrov 2013-10-28 20:26:44 UTC --- THANK YOU. Somehow I've omitted this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA cont

[Bug 10220] symlinks are not counted as files in --stats

2013-10-28 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10220 --- Comment #3 from Wayne Davison 2013-10-28 17:32:26 UTC --- As my paste shows, they are counted in the created files. They aren't counted in the updated regular files since they aren't regular files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samb

[Bug 10220] symlinks are not counted as files in --stats

2013-10-28 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10220 --- Comment #2 from Ivan Dimitrov 2013-10-28 08:26:34 UTC --- Yes, I updated since then, but symlinks are not counted anywhere. Thus making a system that rely on `--dry-run --stats -v |grep transferred` would fail if only symlinks are changed

[Bug 10220] symlinks are not counted as files in --stats

2013-10-27 Thread samba-bugs
||FIXED --- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison 2013-10-27 17:29:29 UTC --- "Transferred" has a particular meaning to rsync which involves creating the data for a file. However, stats were improved in 3.1.0 (notice that the transferred count was further qualified to say &quo

[Bug 10220] New: symlinks are not counted as files in --stats

2013-10-22 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10220 Summary: symlinks are not counted as files in --stats Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

[Bug 10181] --stats bug

2013-10-04 Thread samba-bugs
send --stats to the server. I just checked to see if rrsync was fully up-to-date, and found a few more new options that were missing from the just-released rrsync script (e.g. --preallocate). If you want the very-very latest, get it from here: http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=blob;f=support/r

[Bug 10181] New: --stats bug

2013-10-04 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10181 Summary: --stats bug Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

[Bug 9167] --dry-run --stats --link-dest provides incorrect stats

2012-12-03 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167 --- Comment #1 from Michele Giacomoli 2012-12-03 13:01:45 UTC --- Just a little correction. Evidently using rsync without --stats the correct files are copied, with --stats it just prints wrong stats. -- Configure bugmail: https

[Bug 9167] New: --dry-run --stats --link-dest provides incorrect stats

2012-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167 Summary: --dry-run --stats --link-dest provides incorrect stats Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

Re: --stats and performance issue

2012-06-12 Thread Alan McKay
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Marc Rechté wrote: > I have been struggling for a few days (see my former message --stats and > performance issue) with a similar problem to Alan's If there is any sort of debug or other info I can collect for you that will help you out, just

--stats and performance issue

2012-06-12 Thread Marc Rechté
Thanks Eric, I have been struggling for a few days (see my former message --stats and performance issue) with a similar problem to Alan's. They are very long pauses and very few files / byte transferred. For instance one run gave: Mon Jun 11 18:01:34 CEST 2012 Number of files: 11

--stats and performance issue

2012-06-10 Thread Marc Rechté
Hello, My question is regarding the interpretation of --stats output and whether I have a performance issue or not. Can the client/server architecture (rsync client on one machine, rsync server on another machine) be far slowlier than a local rsync session ? This is the ouput of an rsync

Re: 3.1: bug in --stats

2010-06-26 Thread Wayne Davison
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Carlos Carvalho wrote: > 3.1, including the latest version, produces bogus ---stats output: [...] > Total file size: -6,417,895,484,864,819,269 bytes > This turned out to be an issue with with the F_LENGTH() accessor for a large file that had a na

3.1: bug in --stats

2010-05-03 Thread Carlos Carvalho
3.1, including the latest version, produces bogus ---stats output: % rsync -r --stats . > /tmp/3.1-n % tail -n 17 /tmp/3.1-n Number of files: 3,159 (reg: 2,984, dir: 173, link: 2) Number of created files: 0 Number of deleted files: 0 Number of regular files transferred: 0 Total file s

Re: progress on screen with only stats in a log file

2010-03-27 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Andrei_r20 wrote: > Which combination of options/output redirection permits to display > the progress (--progress) at the standard output and ONLY (no file listing) > the stats (--stats) in a log file? If the stats are also displayed at > the sta

progress on screen with only stats in a log file

2010-03-27 Thread Andrei_r20
Hello ladies & gentlemen, Which combination of options/output redirection permits to display the progress (--progress) at the standard output and ONLY (no file listing) the stats (--stats) in a log file? If the stats are also displayed at the standard output, it's ok Thank you. ps: rs

Rsync usuage stats.

2009-09-08 Thread Hasanat Kazmi
Hello,I am conducting a survey about rsync usage, It will only cost you 2-3 minutes. Survey is present at http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dDlFcS00UGxwNExMMHBxTThjNVVaNEE6MA.. Hasanat -- hasanatka...@gmail.com Hasanat Kazmi +923464362473 -- Please use reply-all for most replies t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2602] Additional file info in the --stats report

2008-09-27 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2602 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: transfer stats wrong?

2008-08-30 Thread dfirth
Try --size-only ?? Denys Dan Letkeman wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a set of files on my laptop running xp. I'm using > cwRsync_2.0.10 and syncing to a Netware Server. Everything appears to > be working fine, but the stats don't look right. When I run the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5389] With --progress, progress stats are overwritten when connection broken

2008-07-28 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5389 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|3.0.2 |3.1.0 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5558] -- Stats Output

2008-06-23 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5558 --- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-24 00:15 CST --- Fair enough I have made the suggestion and it has been rejected I will however continue to regard the need to add a comment explaining the meaning of the statistics externa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5558] -- Stats Output

2008-06-23 Thread samba-bugs
||WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-23 23:59 CST --- I agree with Matt that this is not something that --stats should output. The person calling rsync is in a much better position to know how best to summarize what the copy is doing (e.g. echo the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5558] -- Stats Output

2008-06-23 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5558 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-23 22:39 CST --- With all due respect, a small improvement in readability surely could not be considered bloat, more like commonsense, and to suggest that --stats does not provide statistics

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5558] -- Stats Output

2008-06-23 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5558 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-23 21:46 CST --- (In reply to comment #2) > Yes I can use an echo, but surely we are all looking to improve the product > and > in this case readability of the --stats output W

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5558] -- Stats Output

2008-06-23 Thread samba-bugs
| --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-23 21:05 CST --- Yes I can use an echo, but surely we are all looking to improve the product and in this case readability of the --stats output The current output is like having an answer to a question without the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5558] -- Stats Output

2008-06-23 Thread samba-bugs
||WORKSFORME Summary|-- Stats Output |-- Stats Output --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-23 18:50 CST --- You can print the rsync command yourself using an "echo" in the batch file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5558] New: -- Stats Output

2008-06-22 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5558 Summary: -- Stats Output Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5389] With --progress, progress stats are overwritten when connection broken

2008-04-15 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5389 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: transfer stats wrong?

2008-04-12 Thread Dan Letkeman
;m using > > cwRsync_2.0.10 and syncing to a Netware Server. Everything appears to > > be working fine, but the stats don't look right. When I run the sync > > for the first time it says this: > > > > Number of files: 2429 > > Number of files transferr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5389] New: With --progress, progress stats are overwritten when connection broken

2008-04-11 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5389 Summary: With --progress, progress stats are overwritten when connection broken Product: rsync Version: 3.0.2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2602] Additional file info in the --stats report

2008-04-02 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2602 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-02 08:50 CST --- I guess this didn't happen in 3.0.0 We can use --stats to find if we got any new files, but we have no way of knowing if we got no new files but some files were de

Re: transfer stats wrong?

2008-03-30 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 22:34 -0500, Dan Letkeman wrote: > I have a set of files on my laptop running xp. I'm using > cwRsync_2.0.10 and syncing to a Netware Server. Everything appears to > be working fine, but the stats don't look right. When I run the sync > for the f

transfer stats wrong?

2008-03-30 Thread Dan Letkeman
Hello, I have a set of files on my laptop running xp. I'm using cwRsync_2.0.10 and syncing to a Netware Server. Everything appears to be working fine, but the stats don't look right. When I run the sync for the first time it says this: Number of files: 2429 Number of files transfe

Re: PATCH for 2.6.9 to fix logging of daemon stats

2007-09-20 Thread Julian Pace Ross
ss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 2:05 AM Subject: Re: PATCH for 2.6.9 to fix logging of daemon stats On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 10:17:52PM +0200, Julian Pace Ross wrote: I may be wrong, but it seems that when "total size" is more than bytes (in

Re: PATCH for 2.6.9 to fix logging of daemon stats

2007-09-19 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 10:32:41PM +0200, Julian Pace Ross wrote: > However, I am getting: > "sent 100 bytes received 39551 bytes total size 569895385" on a module > that is 29GB in size I'd imagine that it contains some hard-linked files. Rsync counts all files sepearately. ..wayne.. -- To

Re: PATCH for 2.6.9 to fix logging of daemon stats

2007-09-19 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 10:17:52PM +0200, Julian Pace Ross wrote: > I may be wrong, but it seems that when "total size" is more than > bytes (int32), the total size is still displayed wrongly in > the daemon logs when the daemon is the receiver. What version are you talking about? The CV

Re: Feature suggestion: number of deleted files on --stats

2007-05-04 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 08:45:00AM -0300, Rodrigo Severo wrote: > I'm writing to suggest a small new feature: including the number of > deleted files on --stats. That would be useful to have. Getting it implemented will require a protocol change due to the fact that either the se

Re: Feature suggestion: number of deleted files on --stats

2007-04-26 Thread Matt McCutchen
uot;changed something: ". :) Including the number of deleted files in --stats output might still be nice and wouldn't be hard to do. If a --max-delete limit is specified, rsync already counts the files it deletes. Matt -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/list

Feature suggestion: number of deleted files on --stats

2007-04-06 Thread Rodrigo Severo
Hi, I'm writing to suggest a small new feature: including the number of deleted files on --stats. This way it would be simplier to parse rsync output to detect if it actually changed anything. An example of a real situation: I'm mirroring some files from one server to another (

Re: Redirect --stats to STDERR.

2007-02-07 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 05:19:16PM +0100, LORAND Beno?t wrote: >I have written a little script that's would email me all errors. > rsync -vah --delete --stats > > /var/log/sauvegarde/listoffile.log 2> /var/log/sauvegarde/errors.log > >My problem is i

Re: Redirect --stats to STDERR.

2007-02-07 Thread LORAND Benoît
Aaron W Morris a écrit : On 2/7/07, LORAND Benoît <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I have written a little script that's would email me all errors. rsync -vah --delete --stats > /var/log/sauvegarde/listoffile.log 2> /var/log/sauvegarde/errors.log My pro

Re: Redirect --stats to STDERR.

2007-02-07 Thread Aaron W Morris
On 2/7/07, LORAND Benoît <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I have written a little script that's would email me all errors. rsync -vah --delete --stats > /var/log/sauvegarde/listoffile.log 2> /var/log/sauvegarde/errors.log My problem is i want to have the

Redirect --stats to STDERR.

2007-02-07 Thread Benoît LORAND
Hello, I have written a little script that's would email me all errors. rsync -vah --delete --stats > /var/log/sauvegarde/listoffile.log 2> /var/log/sauvegarde/errors.log My problem is i want to have the stats in my mail. Is it possible to redirect --stats to STD

Redirect --stats to STDERR.

2007-02-07 Thread LORAND Benoît
Hello, I have written a little script that's would email me all errors. rsync -vah --delete --stats > /var/log/sauvegarde/listoffile.log 2> /var/log/sauvegarde/errors.log My problem is i want to have the stats in my mail. Is it possible to redirect --stats to STDERR.

Re: PATCH for 2.6.9 to fix logging of daemon stats

2007-02-03 Thread Julian Pace Ross
Patched it and seems to be working fine now. Thanks Wayne..much appreciated. On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 08:16:27PM +0100, Julian Pace Ross wrote: Would [it] be simple to make a patch for this for 2.6.9? I have worked up a patch for 2.6.9 that fixes the file-size total and the received byte coun

PATCH for 2.6.9 to fix logging of daemon stats

2007-02-02 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 08:16:27PM +0100, Julian Pace Ross wrote: > Would [it] be simple to make a patch for this for 2.6.9? I have worked up a patch for 2.6.9 that fixes the file-size total and the received byte count when the daemon is the receiver. This is similar to what I did for the CVS ver

Re: --stats

2006-12-12 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 09:03:02AM -0800, Nathan wrote: > I can't find an extended-attributes patch for 2.6.8. Are you looking for the patches/xattrs.diff file that comes in the release tar? ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before post

Re: --stats

2006-12-12 Thread Nathan
Oh poo, I can't find an extended-attributes patch for 2.6.8. Guess I'll have to wait. Thanks, --Nathan - Original Message From: Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 2:08:43 PM Su

Re: --stats

2006-12-12 Thread Nathan
Oh poo, I can't find an extended-attributes patch for 2.6.8. Guess I'll have to wait. Thanks, --Nathan - Original Message From: Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 2:08:43 PM Su

Re: --stats

2006-12-11 Thread Wayne Davison
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 07:28:54AM -0800, Nathan wrote: > Is there a way to get --stats to display in something other then bytes? The --human-readable (-h) option transforms some of the stats into larger units (just not the memory stats output via -vv). ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or cha

--stats

2006-12-11 Thread Nathan
Is there a way to get --stats to display in something other then bytes? Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe or change options

Rsync 2.6.9 Develops Conflict Between --stats, I think --delete-after and Local Filesystem Replication

2006-12-09 Thread Sabahattin Gucukoglu
Hi all, Well, yeah, that's it, really. :-) Try it. Works consistently, on Doze and Linux here ... # rsync -vvrlHSPtiypogD --stats --numeric-ids --delete-after --force -- partial-dir=.partial /tmp/ /var/tmp/ [...show stats...] unknown message 4:1 [generator] rsync error: error in

Display stats but not errors

2006-05-03 Thread Gregg Leichtman
Is there any way to force rsync to display stats (--stats) but to be quiet (-q) for everything else?   -=> Gregg <=- Gregg Leichtman Digital Imaging Specialist http://www.radpharm.com Long experience has taught me this about the status of mankind with reg

Re: Stats after network failure?

2006-03-12 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 08:16:05AM -0600, Max Kipness wrote: > is it possible to still receive stats to that point in time? That is not currently possible. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.

Stats after network failure?

2006-03-12 Thread Max Kipness
When rsync fails due to a network connectivity issue to a remote host, is it possible to still receive stats to that point in time? In other words, I'm trying to figure out how I could still receive the amount of sent data at least. As of now, with version 2.6.3 it seems like rsync

Re: Info about "File list size" in --stats

2006-02-13 Thread Wayne Davison
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:23:32AM +0100, Richard Taubo wrote: > When using the --stats option in rsync, see result below, what does > the term: "File list size: 46" mean? It means that rsync wrote 46 bytes across the wire when sending the file-list info from the sender to the re

Info about "File list size" in --stats

2006-02-12 Thread Richard Taubo
Hi! I have a very short and simple question: When using the --stats option in rsync, see result below, what does the term: "File list size: 46" mean? As "Number of files" is 1, I am sure it does not reflect number of files copied. But what is its significance? Number o

Re: How to hide the file name listings, but still see the stats?

2006-02-08 Thread Daniel Rawson
Wayne Davison wrote: On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 02:32:22PM -0500, Daniel Rawson wrote: I am indeed using --dry-run (well, -n, but ...). That must be it! I'm changing this for 2.6.7, as I want the output of -n to be closer to what rsync would output when -n is removed. ..wayne.. Wayne - Tha

Re: How to hide the file name listings, but still see the stats?

2006-02-07 Thread John Van Essen
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 02:32:22PM -0500, Daniel Rawson wrote: >> I am indeed using --dry-run (well, -n, but ...). That must be it! > > I'm changing this for 2.6.7, as I want the output of -n to be closer > to what rsync would output

Re: How to hide the file name listings, but still see the stats?

2006-02-07 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 02:32:22PM -0500, Daniel Rawson wrote: > I am indeed using --dry-run (well, -n, but ...). That must be it! I'm changing this for 2.6.7, as I want the output of -n to be closer to what rsync would output when -n is removed. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: h

Re: How to hide the file name listings, but still see the stats?

2006-02-07 Thread Daniel Rawson
Wayne Davison wrote: On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 08:32:15AM -0500, Daniel Rawson wrote: However, the files (and the deleted files) appear no matter what. Did you specify --dry-run, --progress, --log-format, or -i? Those options can also turn on either verbosity (the first 2) or just the display

Re: How to hide the file name listings, but still see the stats?

2006-02-07 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 08:32:15AM -0500, Daniel Rawson wrote: > However, the files (and the deleted files) appear no matter what. Did you specify --dry-run, --progress, --log-format, or -i? Those options can also turn on either verbosity (the first 2) or just the displaying of the names that are

How to hide the file name listings, but still see the stats?

2006-02-07 Thread Daniel Rawson
I'm using rsync 2.6.6 to transfer some directories with the following invocation rsync -az --delete --ignore-errors --stats -e rsh I would expect to get ONLY the --stats output from this invocation. If I add one or more -v flags, I would expect to see the files listed. However, the

[Bug 2602] Additional file info in the --stats report

2005-05-16 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2602 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments

[Bug 2602] New: Additional file info in the --stats report

2005-04-13 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2602 Summary: Additional file info in the --stats report Product: rsync Version: 2.6.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug 2389] block/character devices on Solaris yield wacky rsync stats

2005-02-27 Thread samba-bugs
5, 2005 4:52 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Bug 2389] block/character devices on Solaris yield wacky rsync stats > Please let me know if this fixes the problem. Hi Wayne, The patch works just fine - thanks! I had originally used the same patch; however, I went with the

[Bug 2389] block/character devices on Solaris yield wacky rsync stats

2005-02-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2389 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2389] block/character devices on Solaris yield wacky rsync stats

2005-02-24 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2389 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-24 19:35 --- Created an attachment (id=982) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=982&action=view) A simpler fix I think a better/simpler fix is to tweak the code in fl

[Bug 2390] some dry run stats inaccurate

2005-02-24 Thread samba-bugs
quot;, but with --dry-run it instead means "this file would be transferred". The stats follow in this same vein: how many files would have been transferred and how large are they? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receivi

[Bug 2390] New: some dry run stats inaccurate

2005-02-24 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2390 Summary: some dry run stats inaccurate Product: rsync Version: 2.6.4 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core

[Bug 2390] some dry run stats inaccurate

2005-02-24 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2390 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-24 17:21 --- Created an attachment (id=980) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=980&action=view) Proposed sender.c / receiver.c patch -- Configure bugmail: https://

[Bug 2389] New: block/character devices on Solaris yield wacky rsync stats

2005-02-24 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2389 Summary: block/character devices on Solaris yield wacky rsync stats Product: rsync Version: 2.6.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity

[Bug 2389] block/character devices on Solaris yield wacky rsync stats

2005-02-24 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2389 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-24 16:43 --- Created an attachment (id=979) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=979&action=view) Proposed syscall.c patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.sam

Re: more filelist --stats

2004-09-07 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 02:54:07PM -0400, Christophe Kalt wrote: > i do see the funky read/write logic in report(), but this only seems > to be used for the two line stats summary I guess I was assuming that we'd only want this statistic from the sender, but that may not be a true assu

  1   2   >