jw schultz writes:
> Soon, i hope. 2.6.1 is looking like a performance release.
Can we get the craigb-perf patch in (sorry I haven't looked in CVS - maybe
it is there)? Thanks to Wayne for porting the patch to 2.6.0.
Craig
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/l
"Mark Weaver" writes:
> Not for me! I'm using cygwin-1.5.6-1, with rsync 2.5.7-2 (as reported by
> cygcheck -s). I've also tried with rsync-1.4.0 (as someone reported that
> worked), and rsync-2.6.0, both built from source. I get a 100% reliable
> hang after the first 0-128k of the first file.
Kirby Bakken writes:
> I'm 99% sure there is a bug in rsync when running in daemon mode on a
> 'remote' server. The bug is that when trying to rsync a sym-link, the
> daemon 'leg' of the code strips off the leading path separator (for linux,
> this would be a '/'). I have produced a 'fixed' v
Steve Schultze writes:
> I have found reference a couple of places on the web describing the
> details of authentication when rsync'ing with the server in
> daemon/non-shell mode. For example:
>
> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6508
> "rsync's authentication mechanism, available o
jw schultz writes:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:18:15PM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hard-link handling
> > >
> > > At the moment hardlink handling is very expensive, so it's off by
> > > default. It does not need to be so.
jw schultz writes:
> I wish we had a better handle on the cygwin hang and
> craigb-perf but i don't want to slow things down.
> CVS is solid on *x now.
As noted in the follow-up emails, it would be great if craigb-perf
goes into CVS just after the next release. That will give it
plenty of testi
Anuja Doshi writes:
> I'm a student trying to get rsync working correctly on
> my WinXP machine.
> My rsync server works perfectly through cygwin.
>
> BUT, when I try to add authentication, I get the message:
> @ERROR auth failed on module Mobilesync
> rsync connection unexpectedly closed (94 byt
jw schultz writes:
> > So anyway, I know the "rsync sometimes hangs under cygwin"
> > problem has been acknowledged, but does anybody know
> > anything about when it might be identified and resolved?
>
> As far as i can tell none of the people who know the rsync
> code use Windows with the possib
Pirla writes:
> If a symlink is relative (like ../../file) the link is copied correctly
> If a symlink is absolute (like /root/document) the link is copied like
> (root/document) whithout the first slash.
man rsyncd.conf:
use chroot
If "use chroot" is true, the rsync server will chr
Dennis Chelukanov writes:
> I running rsync in daemon mode (rsync --daemon)
> Everything seems to work well until I try to protect item with
> password.
>
> here is my /etc/rsyncd.conf :
>
> use chroot = yes
> max connections = 10
> syslog facility = local5
>
> [ftp]
> path = /var/ftp
>
jw schultz writes:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 05:43:56PM -0500, Seann Herdejurgen wrote:
> [snip]
> > Is there a way to tell rsync to update files "in place" and not
> > create a temporary file?
>
> No. Nor can rsync be modified to do so.
Is that true? I thought one could readily add an --inplac
"CHEUNG Chi Wai, Chris" writes:
> I have setup a Rysnc server in Mandrake 9.1
> When I add a auth user into my Rsync.conf and rsync.secrets,
> it do not work, everytime it shows
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] rsync [EMAIL PROTECTED]::X/.html/. /
> Password:
> @ERROR: auth failed on module X
> rsyn
jw schultz writes:
> I've had a chance to think on it. Attached is a patch that
> allows unmap_file() to report the first read error that
> map_ptr found. The behaviour is the same. I doubt this will
> apply against anything but CVS HEAD as of now.
>
> This should probably use FERROR instead o
"John E. Malmberg" writes:
> What is the status of rsync on Windows 2000?
>
> I was looking to install it on my test system, and the download
> directory has a readme file that says I need the cygnus gnu-win32 library.
>
> The link refers me to the index page for cygnus, with no way to get to a
> I've been thinking about adding the capability to store files compressed
> and/or encrypted on either side of the rsync transfer. Let's say there's
> a storage space provider. I want to store my files on that server
> compressed (so I don't use more paid space than I need), and encrypted
> (s
> When using Cygwin Rsync 2.5.6/OpenSSH 3.6.1 for copying files from
> Win2k->Win2k, I get 2 or 3 hung processes on the receiving-side out of about
> every 50 runs. These hung processes cause the system to be unable to
> reboot(?!), requiring a hard reset. Killing the processes allows a graceful
BackupPC version 2.0.0 has been released on SourceForge, see
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net. New features include support
for rsync/rsyncd and internationalization of the CGI interface
(including English, French, Spanish and German).
BackupPC a high-performance perl-based package for backing up
> An updated version of the "Rsync on NT" document is now available at:
> http://www.tiarnan.phlegethon.org/rsyncntdoc.html
For those of us without the benefit of the M$ Windows NT or 2000
Resource Kit, cygwin's own cygrunsrv does the equivalent (or better)
job than the M$ instsrv/srvany.
An exam
> I would like to specify an entry in /etc/rsyncd.conf such that it
> operates on a --one-file-system basis always. The path will point
> to a filesystem mount point, but there is another filesystem that
> is mounted in a subdirectory. I want to back up only those files
> in the pointed to filesy
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 05:36:03PM -0500, Trey Nolen wrote:
> > HmmThis backup server is handling backup jobs from about a dozen other
> > machines -- all but three are Linux. The other three are Windows 2000
> > servers running Cygwin. Two of those are not working (giving the error).
> > Th
> It looks like it will work OK, but it's kinda ugly in that starts
> embedding version stuff into the mdfour implementation. Still... its
> better than the nothing I've produced :-)
Yes, it's certainly not elegant. An alternative would be to
have two different sets of MD4 routines and then have
> > I agree, they should be done together. I don't have my original
> > patch but I can reimplement it with the correct remote_version
> > dependence and send it in the next couple of days (by Thursday
> > evening). My intent is the minimal set of changes, rather than
> > changing the internals.
> I've not heard from you on the adaptive checksum length patch.
> I shall be committing it shortly subject to objections or
> further discussion.
Sorry, I've been extremely busy (http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/030326/265186_1.html).
I've been following the discussion and the patch looks good.
> I would
23 matches
Mail list logo
