jw schultz writes: > I wish we had a better handle on the cygwin hang and > craigb-perf but i don't want to slow things down. > CVS is solid on *x now.
As noted in the follow-up emails, it would be great if craigb-perf goes into CVS just after the next release. That will give it plenty of testing time prior to the subsequent release. I've received a number of emails along the lines of the one below. Also, does craigb-perf still apply cleanly to CVS? I'm just on dialup right now (ugh) so it's not a quick check for me. It would be good if craigb-perf can at least be applied cleanly to a 2.5.8/2.6.0 release. I'm also hoping that the next cygwin release(s) solves the hang problems, but I haven't done testing yet. Craig ################################################## Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:37:24 -0500 Subject: Re: craigb-perf From: Daniel Drucker To: Craig Barratt daniel> I think you should push to get your rsync patch applied by daniel> default to Cygwin's distributed rsync.exe... it changed my daniel> backup time from six hours to four minutes... craig> Wow, that's impressive. Are you sure that both tests had the same craig> initial conditions (ie: you were not also seeing the speedup in the craig> second test because most of the files were unchanged)? Yes, I made quite sure of that :) Daniel -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
