empted to blow away the btrfs filesystem and just do xfs to
xfs, to rule out weird issues there. It would be a shame though as
I was hoping to use btrfs's compression here.
Cheers,
Andy
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or chang
op-at, no crtimes
Optimizations:
SIMD, asm, openssl-crypto
Checksum list:
xxh128 xxh3 xxh64 (xxhash) md5 md4 none
Compress list:
zstd lz4 zlibx zlib none
What am I missing?
Thanks,
Andy
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or c
x27;ve set it up so chris can run rsync with root permissions.
> However I'm not quite sure how to get it to work as one needs to say
> "sudo rsync" to get the root privilege. How do you do that?
The first link I sent you had an example of that: --rsync-path="sudo
rsync&qu
NOPASSWD so
it doesn't ask for a sudo password. Possibly restricting that only
to uses of rsync or a specific script, otherwise it is giving
"chris" blanket sudo access without a password.
Cheers,
Andy
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsub
it only has chris' privileges.
A couple of options:
https://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2021/04/10/rsync-and-sudo-without-x-forwarding/
Since you want to automate it I'd go with letting root log in by ssh
key only, and force the key to work only with a specific script.
Here is an exam
e been doing it for years.
Cheers,
Andy
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
ngs I will investigate before settling for the
"split into multiple jobs" approach; just wondered if anyone has any
shortcuts for me.
Thanks,
Andy
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/m
duplication feature that is currently experimental in XFS to
reduce the size of my rsnapshot backups. Some more info:
http://strugglers.net/~andy/blog/2017/01/10/xfs-reflinks-and-deduplication/
rsync is hardlinking together files that do not change between two
backup runs, but reflinks are
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:12:53PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> "-/ tmp/" works though, and does only exclude exactly what I want.
I spoke too soon. For me, "-/ tmp/" works identically to "- tmp/",
that is it excludes everything with a "tmp/" directory i
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 05:59:29PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:43:33PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > From the manpage:
> >
> >The following modifiers are accepted after a “+” or “-”:
> >
> >o A / specifies that the
even if “foo” is at the root of the current transfer.
>
> Hence, your dir-merge setup causes only the absolute path /tmp/ to be
> excluded. If you want to exclude /data/home/andy/tmp/ then put that in
> your .rsync-filter .
Neither "-/ /data/home/andy/tmp/" nor "- /
on 29.
I'm calling:
rsync --filter='dir-merge /.rsync-filter' -avz --delete \
--numeric-ids --relative --delete-excluded --sparse --hard-links \
--rsh='/usr/bin/ssh -4 -i /root/.ssh/rsync -q' \
r...@corona:/data \
/data/backup/.sync/corona/
On the sender, I have in the file
Yep that did the trick! thanks Matt.
Quoting Matt:
Ownership is separate from permissions. To preserve user and group
ownership, you need to pass -og .
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
--
P
Hi Nate,
Yes the user id exists on both hosts with the same UID, I also
tried the --numeric-ids but this didn't make any difference :S
thanks Andy.
Quoting nate:
Do the same userids exist at both ends? Try --numeric-ids as
an option and see if that
ne explain whats wrong and if I can do anything to fix this?
/usr/local/bin/rsync -r -p -e "ssh -l cacti -i
/home/cacti/.ssh/id_dsa" sourceserver::cacti /usr/home/cacti
Rsync version is 3.0.4 on FreeBSD
thanks, Andy.
-
enting it being better...
thanks! Andy.
- Original Message -
From: "Matt McCutchen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andy Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: Incremental file updates over a network, NFS?
On Mon, 2008-03-
difference if I push or pull from the
server side? Im thinking
the only important thing is if you pull you can set the server side
read-only which is better for
security, that about right??
thanks again! Andy.
- Original Message -
From: "Matt McCutchen" <[EMAIL PROTE
less with the keypairs
and for the time being I removed the forced command from authorized_keys in
case Id made some syntax mistake.
Any ideas whats going on? Not very nice of rsync to coredump instead of
giving me a helpful error msg! :(
Thanks!! Andy.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https:/
seperate rsync per homedir/UID?
thanks Andy.
You're understanding correctly. There would only be an advantage if for
some reason you didn't want to set an authorized key for the user
running the daemon but were fine with setting an authorized key for
another user.
--
To unsubscribe
single-use and
background daemons).
I don't really get what you mean, if another user accepts the ssh logins
then I need to have an authorized_keys for them??
So theres not an advantage, hence I dont think Im understanding u
properly... Can you elaborate a little pls??
thanks alot! Andy.
put public private keys on systems to allow
non interactive logons
Any comments on the above assesment or advise from others regarding security?
thanks Andy.
Rsync works on a client/server system. So it's recommended to install rsync
on both machines (your and the server), so you bypass NF
ulate! ;) If someone
could enlighten me that
would be great!!
thanks, Andy.--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Hi,
I encountered a weird file corruption problem with rsync.
I have a perl script that generates and writes a data file to disk, then
rsyncs the file to a remote machine. A perl script running on the remote
machine periodically reads in the data file.
However, occasionally the remote script
Paul Slootman wrote:
> Inserting bytes at the beginning of a file can't be done, at
> least not on unix-like systems. That can only be done by copying
> the file.
Ok. What about if there were some inserts in the middle
of the hypothetical 500MB file, starting for example at
the 450 millionth up
Rsync is efficient at transferring diffs across the wire, but how
efficient is it at updating the remote file itself (in terms of disk
operations)?
If, for example, you have a 500MB file (say an ISO) whose modification
consists solely of a few bytes added on to the beginning of the file.
Will it
ind a real
solution to file ownership if I can and am very open to testing all suggestions.
Thanks,
Andy
--- On Mon 05/10, Stephane Rohart < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
From: Stephane Rohart [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 11:48:02 +0200
Subject: cw
I think it's pretty impressive that rsync can discover nothing had changed
with just 371 bytes in one direction and 20 in another!
Andy
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
-t will preserve the timestamps.
Andy
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
r you could overwrite
everything!
Andy Henson
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Fri Oct 17 15:48:56 2003
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
Copyright (C) 1996-2000 by Andrew Tridgell
Copyright (C) Paul Mackerras 1996
Copyright (C) 2002 by Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ Copyright (C) 2003, Andy Henson, Zexia Access Ltd
This program is free software; you can re
mp-file is specified to
be "look for a similarly named file with just a number changed", but
perhaps we need an option for that too :)
I've had a read through the relevant source code and I am confident I
could add this functionality. I was waiting to see what others are doing
Rsync maps files into memory, so it cannot handle files larger than the
program's address space. On 32 bit machines this is likely to be less
than 2GB.
You don't say what processor you are running on? Can it map files of
bigger than 2GB into memory?
Andy Henson
--
To unsubscribe
ve seen so far. It's much better
than "rdist" and even some of the commercial applications. A Big thanks
to the rsync development community.
Regards,
Andy Lam
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xilinx Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:50:24 -0700
>
>
p/rsync /export/volx/documents/
destination_login@hostB:/export/volx (notice I left dry-run there for
testing)
Thank you in advance for your help .
Andy Lam
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo
Greetings,
I have searched through most of the rsync FAQ and can't find any similar
cases. I'm hoping someone in this mailing list may have done it in the
past and can shred lights on me.
First of all, I am not new to "rsync" and we have been using it to
move/mirror data across our internal net
On Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:28, you wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Andy Goth wrote:
> > Can rsync be made to merge files? For instance, could I synchronize
> > mboxes between multiple computers, even though they're all changing?
>
> Not if they are changing sim
Can rsync be made to merge files? For instance, could I synchronize mboxes
between multiple computers, even though they're all changing?
I have _serious_ doubts, because I think it would take a diff3, but a friend
mentioned it, so I had to ask.
--
Andy Goth | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Thu, 2 Nov 2000 17:56:56, Bennett Todd wrote:
> 2000-11-02-15:17:27 Andy Small:
> > I searched the archive of last 3 months of this list for a FAQ
> > posting, but I could not find one.
>
> I haven't seen such a document, but this mailing list seems to work
> pretty
I searched the archive of last 3 months of this list for a FAQ posting, but I could
not find one.
My question is this: Where does rsync store the filelist that it builds? Or more to
the point... When you fork off rsync processes in rapid succession, does
it have to build the list for each pro
39 matches
Mail list logo