I noticed in looking at download dirs for a project, that
another mirror had "crept-in" for usage (where different mirrors
are stored under mirror-URL names). To copy over the diffs,
normally I'd do:
rsync -uav dir1/. dir2/.
(where dir1="the new mirror that I'd switched
ental backups done once a day
for every machine. I also do hourly incremental backups on my desktop
machine but that is more for protecting myself against myself than for
protecting against intruders or hardware failure.
Yeah, that's why I had the 'previous versions thing working
On 2021/08/07 03:44, Chris Green via rsync wrote:
L A Walsh via rsync wrote:
It seems to me, a safer bet would be to generate an ssh-cert
that allows a passwdless login from your sys to the remote.
The trouble with that is that it leaves a big security hole.
If you only
On 2021/08/03 07:09, Chris Green via rsync wrote:
I already have an rsync daemon server running elsewhere, I can add
this requirement to that I think. Thank you.
It seems to me, a safer bet would be to generate an ssh-cert
that allows a passwdless login from your sys to the remote
Have a directory with a bunch rpms in it, mostly x86_64.
Have another directory with a bunch, mostly 'noarch'.
Some of the noarch files are already in the x86_64 dir
and don't want to overwrite them. They are on the same
physical disk, so really, just want the new 'noarch&#x
If you are doing a local<-> local transfer, you are wasting time
with checksums. You'll get faster performance with "--whole-file".
Why do you stop it at night when you could 'unlimit' the transfer speed?
Seems like when you aren't there would be best time
same time.
FWIW, one of the big changes that went into SMB 3 for Win10 was
adding the ability to do file transfers using more than one connection.
CIFS (and windows) have traditionally been limited to 1 connection that
everything was multiplexed over.
However, CIFS in write/reads from a client
On 9/18/2018 7:44 AM, Frank Steiner via rsync wrote:
Hi,
the man page states
For systems that support extended-attribute namespaces, a copy being
done by a super-user copies all namespaces except system.*.
That's the reason why NFAv4 ACLs are not copied as they are i
On 8/19/2018 10:11 PM, just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via
rsync wrote:
The following test script shows that attempting to exclude the file
/sourcedir/a/file2 by using //sourcedir//a//file2 in the excluded files
list, will silently not exclude it because of all those adjacent
On 8/22/2018 2:09 PM, Shaya Potter via rsync wrote:
If one is rsyncing a machine without selinux (therefore no
security.selinux xattr on each file), to a system that has selinux (even
in permissive mode), rsync doesn't play nice.
basically selinux seems to make it appear that every
Hi:
I'm in the middle of recoverying from a tactical error copying
around an Mac OS X 10.10.5 Time Machine backup (turns out Apple's
instructions aren't great...), and I had rsync running for the past 6
hours repairing permissions/acls on 1.5 TB of data (not copying the
dat
Kevin Korb via rsync wrote:
Note that in all --*-dest options if the path is relative it is relative
to the target dir not the "$PWD". I like to always use absolute paths
because of this. But essentially, the command with the instances of
$PWD vs without them the paths aren't the same. If you
klt/.
|& tee testlt.log
sending incremental file list
delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file
./
a is uptodate
d is uptodate
b
a => b
/tmp> ll -i srclt dstlt baklt
baklt:
total 8
17305770 -rw-rw-r-- 2 2 Apr 5 15:46 a
17305770 -rw-rw-r-- 2 2 Apr 5 15:46 b
dstlt:
total 8
8
3.1.1 for over a year to help generate
snapshots. I can't say if it copied all the files or not, as
it was backing up a large "/home" partition, BUT, it never hung.
It did take 45min to a few hours to do the compare, but it
was comparing a large amount of data (>750G) w/a snapshot
samba-b...@samba.org wrote:
--snipp--
It seems that pv is waiting for data from rsync, and rsync is waiting for data
too (stuck in select()) and not closing the input to pv. So it's a deadlock.
Same happens when you substitute pv with something else (like dd). It seems
that those commands
Stefan Berger wrote:
The security.evm extended attribute is fully owned by the Linux kernel
and cannot be directly written from userspace. Therefore, we can always
skip it.
--- (see below "...")...
Please put this on a switch or option.
The security.evm field seems only
Hi all,
I have read the documentation and I think the best solution is to use pre/post
xfer and verbose log. If you have another idea, please let me know.
Cheers,
De : greg A
Envoyé : mardi 29 novembre 2016 15:51
À : rsync@lists.samba.org
Objet : Volumetry
Hi All,
I am sending an email to you beacause I would like to have your opinion about
rsync and volumetry.
Currently I am using a rsync server since a while, it is working well. but now
I would like to know the volumetry of downloaded data (per users and modules).
I don't find (yet) an
I was thinking about [Bug 3099]... in that while it's easy to get a 2-3x
speed
for the average app using parallel scans, the upper and lower bounds on that
speed increase could be <1x in a worst case (very unlikely, but with
primitive
or constrained (in a container or VM) HW, the cha
Fyodorov "Bga" Alexander wrote:
Hi. Thanks for good program.
Whole /proc is serious security
risk for me. Why?
You could run rsync in a separate namespace (container)
and only mount /proc in the new namespace -- other users wouldn't
see it..
Bunch of tools &
samba-b...@samba.org wrote:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101
--- Comment #1 from Jason Pyeron ---
this is
https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync-patches.git;a=blob;f=write-devices.diff
using it in production now
I'm am probably confused, but it looks like this patch
do
samba-b...@samba.org wrote:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10857
--- Comment #4 from samba@tange.dk ---
Can we start by agreeing that rsync _could_ be aware that it is starting a
remote shell and thus _could_ quote anything that needed quoting?
---
No. Quotes might be
Kevin Korb wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You want less -v and more --itemize-changes. --verbose is utterly
useless without --itemize-changes.
Just remembered to check this group... ;-)
Thanks I tried it... most were
.f...a.
Now I'm wondering about
I just copied a file system using
xfsdump|xfsrestore
At least 1 new directory had been created on the source during the
xfer (took 9+hours -- 7TB), so I wanted to verify I hadn't missed anything.
Using rsync:
rsync --version
rsync version 3.1.0 protocol version 31
Capabilities:
6
Kevin Korb wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Any non-daemon software is supposed to exit (and cleanup) when hit
with a hangup signal. Pretty sure it isn't new to rsync.
But I didn't send it a hangup signal. By calling snaprun
in a subshell (snaprun
I have a script that normally runs my snapshot that I haven't
used for the past several days because something seemed
to be going wrong and I wanted to run things manually.
But running the script twice today, I got:
snaphome
Found 15 mounted dated, snaps or snap archives
»[snapper
I have a problem similar to this bug, not sure if it is the same bug or
not, the consequences
in my case are killing off a daily snapshot mechanism.
As mentioned in the "Concern rsync failing to find attributes..." thread,
I am doing an rsync from A->B while excluding files
in a -
Dan Stromberg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Adam Edgar wrote:
It seems the issue is indeed in the ssh layer. scp has the same issue and some
work has been done in “fixing” that:
That's a separate issue.
rsync's performance WITHOUT ssh -- running locally is
I don't know the reasons why, but for some reason the cygwin version of
rsync has lost the extattr copy ability (as shown by this:
rsync --version
rsync version 3.1.0 protocol version 31
Copyright (C) 1996-2013 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others.
Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/
C
Kevin Korb wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I wasn't objecting to the use of multiple file systems. I have a
bunch of them too. I was objecting to the use of partitions to
achieve multiple files systems. Logical volume management has been
available for a long time an
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:52 PM, L. A. Walsh <mailto:rs...@tlinx.org>> wrote:
Why would or how would the files and attr-names get transfered but
be missing?
Give 3.1.1 a try -- it has a fix in it for miss-sorted attr names when
running as
Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
One thing you that im not seeing factored in is rpm speed of the drives.
Since my tests are run on the same machines and drives, such
things factor out (as do cpu Hz, memory speeds, controller firmware,
... etc).
Make sense?
--
Please use reply-all for most repli
Kevin Korb wrote:
I ran the util and have gotten odd results each time I ran it.
What util? What results?
Besides the ones I included in the previous email, I ALSO experienced this:
(from bug
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724):
"The above was just
performance limited by statically defined internal flow control
buffers. These buffers often end up acting as a bottleneck for network
throughput of SCP, especially on long and high bandwith network links.
It is *A* bottle neck over networks. look for extensions to ssh to
ship
Kevin Korb wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/26/2014 01:52 AM, L. A. Walsh wrote:
I have a regular script I run to make static "snapshots" of my
home file system, with each being all the files that changed in the
past 24 hours.
I am not clear about
I have a regular script I run to make static "snapshots" of my home
file system, with each being all the files that changed in the past 24
hours.
I just moved my home partition to a new harddisk w/more space.
I ran the util and have gotten odd results each time I ran it.
This one
wrote:
I am trying to transfer a group of files in whole using rsync using the
—files-from option across a network with high bandwidth but relatively high
latency. When I log into the remote machine I see an rsync command running like
thus:
rsync --server --sender -Re.sf -B16384 --files-from
samba-b...@samba.org wrote:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10637
--- Comment #1 from Karl O. Pinc 2014-05-28 19:05:04 UTC ---
Yum is also rsync happy. That's where our --link-dest backups always break due
to too many hard links.
--
What would be "too many&
I am trying to understand how rsync uses ssh. From what I understand of
the source, it simply opens a ssh connection and then simply pipes
rsync's data. But somehow my stomach tells me that this is not the whole
story.
For one, that would mean the whole (?) of rsync's protocol is onl
.
My hesitation with backing up a Windows system with rsync is that
I have absolutely no idea to go from "I have a blank computer and
a copy of all my files" to "I have a working computer with all my
stuff". I might be asking for something as simple as "Install
Windows,
Donald Pearson wrote:
..backing up a complete Windows system and doing a bare metal restore..
That would really be something.
Depends on what you mean bare-metal restore... if you have 'bare metal',
then that would seem to mean no OS. If you have no OS, what are you
running the
Kevin Korb wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The rsync equivalent to cp -al would be:
rsync -a --link-dest=/path/to/dir1 /path/to/dir1/ /path/to/dir2/
Note that I switched to absolute paths since rsync considers
- --link-dest relative paths to be relative to the target so
p' tries to 'hardlink' to symlinks, which AFAIR
has never been an option -- any more than hardlinking to
directories.
I was trying to see if rsync was a viable alternative until the bug
is fixed, and had abilities cp used to (bug currently does not).
--
Please use reply-all for mo
I have a dir "dir/"
with 2 dirs in it "a/" and "b/".
dir b/ has a file in it 'file'
dir a has a relative symlink to that file:
Ishtar:/tmp> ll dir
total 0
drwxrwxr-x 2 20 Mar 26 10:51 a/
drwxrwxr-x 2 17 Mar 26 10:49 b/
Ishtar:/tmp> ll dir/{a
Perry Smith wrote:
This is my first time to really use rsync. I did small tests to get the
arguments like I wanted and then kicked off the big rsync about 2 and a half
hours ago. So far, it has not copied over any files.
-
Is it really making progress? Or will it take this long to
Was there some reason that patch got dropped?
Otherwise rsync eats up all the buffer memory.
Note -- I tried directio -- didn't work due to alignment
issues -- buffers have to be aligned to sectors.
The kernel, if I remember correctly, has been on again/off again
on requiring alignment on dir
On Thursday 29 August 2013 11:46 PM, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Sherin A <mailto:sherin...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hope they will report it as a vulnerability , because this POC
has been exploited successfully and it is affected by all
software
On Wednesday 28 August 2013 08:36 AM, Kevin Korb wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Only when you choose to force a completely unnecessary chown between
the backup and restore process.
On 08/27/13 23:03, Sherin A wrote:
On Wednesday 28 August 2013 04:14 AM, Kevin Korb wrote
On Wednesday 28 August 2013 04:14 AM, Kevin Korb wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My opinion on backups is pretty simplistic. If a restore of my backup
doesn't bring me back to what I had when I backed up then I don't have
a backup.
If I have to restore somethi
ncremental file list
f+ testfile
sent 30 bytes received 89 bytes 238.00 bytes/sec
total size is 0 speedup is 0.00
asylum# ls -l /tmp/testfile
- -rw-r- 1 kmk users 0 Aug 14 15:47 /tmp/testfile
The file gets stored in the backup as the backups user but with a tag
saying it is really
nding incremental file list
f+ testfile
sent 30 bytes received 89 bytes 238.00 bytes/sec
total size is 0 speedup is 0.00
asylum# ls -l /tmp/testfile
- -rw-r- 1 kmk users 0 Aug 14 15:47 /tmp/testfile
The file gets stored in the backup as the backups user but with a tag
saying it is
e the file with
- --fake-super it will restore with the original ownership. Of course
that means that the restore has to be run with super privs on the
target and --fake-super on the source.
On 08/14/13 13:30, Sherin A wrote:
On Wednesday 14 August 2013 10:25 PM, Kevin Korb wrote:
-BEGIN
On Wednesday 14 August 2013 10:25 PM, Kevin Korb wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> As has been pointed out to you your problem is not hard links. Your
> problem is the indiscriminate use of a root operation (a chown) during
> the restoration process.
On Wednesday 14 August 2013 08:29 PM, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 04:09:46PM +0530, Sherin A wrote:
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 10:24 PM, Justin T Pryzby wrote:
PS : if any one interested in making a patch with an additional
option for rsync for excluding hardlinks with
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 10:24 PM, Justin T Pryzby wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:10:04PM +0530, Sherin A wrote:
I am doing rsync from root@10.0.0.10/home/foo to
storageuser@10.0.0.20/home/storageuser/dailybackup/foo over ssh (no
role for -H)
Why not rsync from root to root? Or use
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 09:49 PM, Justin T Pryzby wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 09:43:06PM +0530, Sherin A wrote:
If linux user foo , with home /home/foo , what ownership we need
to give the files under his home folder , it must be "foo" and not
root.
Why? The user c
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 09:07 PM, Justin T Pryzby wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:44:08PM +0530, Sherin A wrote:
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 05:50 PM, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
BUT there is no direct vulnerability in that, only processes after
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 08:56 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
On 13.08.2013 20:44, Sherin A wrote:
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 05:50 PM, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
BUT there is no direct vulnerability in that, only processes after that
(like
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 07:51 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
On 13.08.2013 15:51, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
I read your sentence differently:
If he can make a HARD link to the shadow file, then he can already
read it - and worse.
My
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 05:50 PM, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
BUT there is no direct vulnerability in that, only processes after that
(like backup/rsync) can make a vulnerability out of it.
... which is what I already wrote.
Paul
So the solutions
a lot
of production servers as a better tool for file backups. As in the case
of a hosting server , we can't always trust all hosting users in a
single server. Also just ignore the shadow and let us say there are
two user on /home/foo and /home/fun and the user fun created a hardlin
riginal file system.
Joe
On 08/13/2013 01:11 AM, Sherin A wrote:
Can some one create a patch for excluding "hard link regular file"
from copying ?. May be like a command flag , rsync
--no-hardlink-copy
Hello Jose,
I think it is possible to check whether a file is regul
Can some one create a patch for excluding "hard link regular file" from
copying ?. May be like a command flag , rsync --no-hardlink-copy
--
--
Regards
Sherin A
http://www.sherin.co.in/
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid om
Greetings,
I have been using the rsync C source as a guide for porting the rsync
algorithm to Java. This has been successful, but there is one low level
detail I am having some issues with.
Assuming the default block size of 700 bytes, when stepping through the
file and generating checksums
If I run rsync w/no args I get a help (3.0.7).
It has: (among other things):
-h, --human-readableoutput numbers in a human-readable format
&
(-h) --help show this help (-h works with no other options)
So ... is it the case that -h with no other options gives
Sorry for asking this but I find the manpage to be a little confusing
on this. I want rsync to only replace files that has acctually a
different content, it should completely ignore any timestamps on
files..
How can I make it behave like that?
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid
not a simple way to make it update the file in the standard
way and then change the ownership afterwards, or is there? Do you have
to write that program your self?
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org
Sorry about the repost. This was apparently stuck in my mail server
and just unstuck itself when I rebooted.
On Apr 6, 2010, at 1:31 PM, "David A. Soussan" > wrote:
Wayne, et al:
First posting, and I'm a n00b with rSync. I was having issues with
rSync
from a PC
Wayne, et al:
First posting, and I'm a n00b with rSync. I was having issues with rSync
from a PC (3.0.7 either via DeltaCopy or cwRsync) to a Freenas box
(3.0.6). I've since replicated and isolated the problem attempting to
sync PC to PC with various flavors of rSync on both sides.
The
(Sorry if this is a repost - didn't see my earlier post, so thinking it
got lost somehow.)
Wayne, et al:
First posting, and I'm a n00b with rSync. I was having issues with rSync
from a PC (3.0.7 either via DeltaCopy or cwRsync) to a Freenas box
(3.0.6). I've since replicated a
Posted a message earlier, seen others since but not mine. Test post to
see if this makes it to the list or not.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http
It would be 'nice' if there was an option for rsync to ignore case --
Windows
is real lax about what case files are, and often files will end up with
different cases
depending on what util installed a font last.
When you transfer to linux, you end up with 2 (or more) copies of f
I didn't explain the problem clearly (as usual, sigh) the first time.
What I was trying to do is transfer from a a cygwin environment using a cygwin
rsync (which should be able to support extended attributes on XFS-based,
Windows Shares exported with 'samba & the extended attribut
I wonder why I got an error message from rsync then if the are
supported...
Matt McCutchen wrote:
There are getfattr and setfattr for manipulating extended attributes
from the command line. Were you thinking of something different?
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting t
FUSE runs on windows?
It was from cygwin to a CIFS (Samba machine) -- problem is
that cygwin's view of CIFS is pretty limited -- (apparently) since
CIFS supports the extended windows attributes (like the Zone code that
stores where files have come from when you download them) -- an
Maybe rsync could support extattrs on non-supporting fs's with a
..xattr file stored
at the same place as the :
If a user used a switch to emulate 'xattrs', then on a fs that
didn't support real .xattrs one
could still ACL and other .xattr info. If a user ran rsync w
I was just thinking -- would it be possible to just 'emulate' xattrs on
systems that
don't support them natively with a "--Xe" switch -- that would store the
xattrs
in a file "..xattr" in the same dir as the copied file. The
switch only be
paid attention to o
I know you guys hate questions like this, but has anyone had experience
with a particular Windows client they would endorse?
I need to sync some Windows boxen. I'm just looking for someone to tell
me they're using X and happy.
--
Jason A Nunnelley
President Tech Anything, Inc.
Thanks for that
I am using Dreamhost and there is rsync installed, but not version 3. I
understand that they do not upgrade the operating system or packages
until there is a definite need.
Thanks
Chris
Chris A Harris
Adelaide
Australia
Paul Slootman wrote:
On Wed 30 Jan 2008, Chris A
Thanks for the reply.
I will wait for a Debian package and extract the file; I do
not have enough experience to compile from source.
Regards
Chris
> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 13:43 +1030, Chris A Harris wrote:
> > I am using a shared host running on Debian sarge. I can
> > not i
I am using a shared host running on Debian sarge. I can not
install packages.
Is there an executable for that call be used?
Regards
Chris
Adelaide
Australia
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs
erbose --progress --stats --recursive
/home/vpopmail/ 192.167.1.61::email_backup/
they are not symlinks as log mentioned they are hidden files (or dot
files),
"Hidden file" is not a file type. On Unix-like systems, the concept
of hidden-ness does not exist at the filesystem level or in most
files
> If you mean a background daemon contacted over a
> port forwarded by ssh, tell me because many of the
> answers would be different.
Yes, that. I guess I should have been more specific.
:-)
Thanks,
Wayne
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listi
Hi all,
I am looking for to only sync directories and files structures only,
without coping any data within files...
Is there a switch/trick available for this in rsync?
Thanks for any suggestions.
--
Sincerely,
Nick A Gordun mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe or change
Hello
Is this still the only way to make rsync case insensitive, or is there a
smarter/built-in way that I don't know about? This is only a part of a much
larger include file!
- *.[Gg][Ii][Dd]
- *.[Ll][Nn][Kk]
- *.[Oo][Ll][Dd]
- *.[Tt][Ee][Mm][Pp]
- *.[Tt][Mm][Pp]
- [Tt][Hh][Uu][Mm][B
I have a similar problem, but it is also in the 'find' command
on a windows box. Are you, per chance, running the cygwin port
of rsync?
Whether or not, you might try a simple experiment -- see if you
can move the affected file(s) using Explorer Windows.
Also check if you can see t
From: "Wayne Davison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This is because rsync is a copy command, and you told it to copy a file
> that doesn't exist. Rsync does not currently have a way to specify
> individual files to delete,
This is exactly what I am asking for... why? rsync
62.87
rsync error: partial transfer (code 23) at main.c(578)
It's an rsync version 2.5.5
I can see the difference but at the same time I do not see a reason why
--delete option should not work if files are explicitly listed. If not
--delete, then maybe some of its variants, like --delete
If I use the "-I" to ignore date and size as quick-check methods of
determining
change, what method does it use to determine difference? If it falls
back to
checksumming the entire file, maybe the manpage might warn that this
would be
as expensive as using the "-c" option...or not depending on
Rsync version 2.6.0 on a HP B.11.00
Rsync version 2.4.6 on Solaris 8
- Original Message -
From: "Tomasz Ciolek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "leblancei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
delete, get rid
> of the trailing '*' in the source path -- it is inhibiting deletions in
> the base dir of the transfer (leave a trailing '/'). After that, advise
> the folks at ftp.uk.debian.org that they should update their rsync to
> 2.6.2.
Many thanks to Wayne Dav
I'm having a pretty serious rsync bug, which I've submitted to the
Debian bug system. But as the rsync maintainer there seems to be a bit
slow in fixing problems, I thought perhaps I should report it here
as well.
I'm using rsync 2.6.2 on a Debian woody system, with libc 2.2.
I can second this bug, I've only seen it under 2.5.7, with -essh option
(haven't used rsync without that in a long time).
On Sat, 2004-01-24 at 00:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> None of this does us any good without, at a bare minimum, the command line
> you're using
Thanks for the suggestion Wayne - it's not one I was
aware of and works. We can't use it though - every
20th backup, the program which runs rsync on the user
client does --delete to remove dead files from the
server. With exclude = * this doesn't work.
Any other ideas?
Quick question:
I was trying to verify signature file rsync-2.6.0.tar.gz.sig for latest
version or rsync and am getting:
gpg: Signature made Thu Jan 01 11:14:08 2004 PST using DSA key ID 4B96A8C5
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
I've checked for this key id but have not found it
We currently use rsync in daemon mode running on linux boxes to provide a Windows
client backup facility. Although restricted by IP range we have not setup
username/password authentication (this would be too much to maintain for us) but I am
aware that this is a security problem as any users
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 13:48, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 07:49:51PM -0500, James A. Morrison wrote:
> > e.g.
> > rsync -f rsync.files [EMAIL PROTECTED]::jim/ .
> > and
> > rsync -s rsync.files [EMAIL PROTECTED]::jim
>
> In CVS, both directions
Hi,
The link on http://rsync.samba.org/lists.html to asking smart
questions still points to tuxedo.org, this should probably be
updated to point to catb.org .
Thanks,
Jim
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.
Hi,
We've found a need to list the files to transfer in a files since
our command lines got too long. Anyway, the attached patch
implements reading from a file with two command line options.
The first is from-file, this file contains a list of files to get
from src. The second is subst
Hi,
We want to copy a file from NT to Solaris using rSync.
There is a job running on Solaris looking for this file.
So we want to copy the file with different name and
then rename it to what the job is looking for.
(Don't want the job to pickup incomplete file)
How can this be done with
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
