Dan Stromberg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Adam Edgar <aed...@research.att.com> wrote:
It seems the issue is indeed in the ssh layer. scp has the same issue and some
work has been done in “fixing” that:
----
That's a separate issue.
rsync's performance WITHOUT ssh -- running locally is 100 times slower
than a
large buffer program.
Even over ssh, one can get over 100MB/s with the stock source.
Locally, it's read/writes to files and pipes that are the problem.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
