rsync watchers,
I've been using rsync version 3.1.1+, and do like the improved --stats
output: e.g.
Number of files: 2480403 (reg: 2034290, dir: 233487, link: 212174, special: 452)
Number of created files: 356 (reg: 6, dir: 3, link: 347)
Number of regular files transferred: 16
...
- thanks to
Folks,
b...@stupidkitties.com wrote:
" I was wondering if it'd be feasible to add an option (or multiple options,
depending on the desired granularity) to cause rsync to treat changes in file
attributes the same way it treats changes to the file's contents when it
encounters hard links at the des
rsync folks,
Henri Shustak wrote:
LBackup always starts a new backup snapshot with an empty directory. I
have been looking at extending --link-dest options to scan beyond just
the previous successful backup to (failed backups / older backups).
However, there are all kinds of edge cases which ar
Folks,
We faced a similar situation to that which Ken described - we recycle
backup directories, for good reason.
There is a patch to solve the problem.
Our systems administrator provided the following description of the
patches we use:
==
Thanks to Kevin and Paul for responses.
We use a modified Tower of Hanoi scheme (on top of rsync and --link-dest
and recycling) for deciding which backups to keep.
Here is a sample of our holdings for one area:
home.2024.seq.0 set 0
home.20130512.seq.512 set 10
h
Kevin,
Thanks for the reply and interest in this topic.
Comments below.
Regards
Rob.
I did consider that but rejected it for 2 reasons...
1. Backup run time. We have a 4 hour window to run backups at night.
Using recycled directories significantly extended the backup run
time. The deleti
Folks,
Kevin Korb wrote:
Have you considered more advanced methods such as subvolume snapshots
provided by ZFS and BTRFS? At work we were forced to abandon rsync
- --link-dest because of the amount of time it takes to delete old
backups when the data is primarily many millions of small files
(s
Folks,
I would find the output of -stats information to be useful when
rsync fails.
Typically, we use rsync to do backups, and if an rsync fails, we'd like
to know how much data has been transferred in the failed run, to report
on our internal web page for the backups, and to make estimates of h
Folks,
Thinking again about the issue of
changed attributes for a file in source that is identical in content
to a file in destination that is hard linked get propagated to the
--link-dest directories
I would like to suggest a new flag, (perhaps called something like
--preserve-linked-at
Paul Wayne, Kevin, Teodor and others,
Thanks for your contributions in response to my postings.
Paul: I was very imprecise if not plain wrong in my description. :-(
Thanks for explaining what really happens.
"Rsync will not update an existing file in-place unless you use the
--inplace option.
Kevin,
Thanks for your response.
Some observations are inter-lined below.
Rob.
Regards
Rob. Bell e-mail: robert.b...@csiro.au
--
Dr Robert C. Bell, BSc (Hons) PhD
Technical Services Manager
Advanced Scientific Computing
CSIRO IM&T
Phone: +61 3 9669 8102 | Mobile: +61 428 108 333
Folks,
We use rsync extensively for protecting data by making backups.
Thank you to the authors and maintainers.
Like many others, we use the --link-dest option to cut down on the space
occupied by the backups.
Unlike many others, we re-cycle old backup directories. Since most file
systems
Wayne,
Thanks for the information - that looks useful for the future, and
would replace our option.
Rob.
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 23:10:43 -0700
From: Wayne Davison
To: Robert Bell
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [patch] link-dest messages and max-size warnings (fwd)
On Thu, Aug 23
rsync Folks,
The following explanatory text is by me and the patches are by Rowan
McKenzie for use by the Advanced Scientific Computing group at CSIRO.
This patch builds upon the --link-dest patch by Bryant Hansen (Thanks heaps!).
1. The original patch provided an alternate behaviour for rsync
Dear rsync folks,
Re the recent discussion of:
Subject: RE: Does files-from work with --delete?
We have come across the same issue, in doing partial backups of a file
system and using the --files-from and --link-dest feature to a re-cycled
area. Files that should be deleted tend to build up.
avison
To: Robert Bell
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: rsync --link-dest option with the destination directory
containing old files.
Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:56:17 +1100 (EST)
Resent-From:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:22:42AM +1100, Robert Bell wrote:
we would like rsync to
Way back:
> -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003
> 09:56:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Rubel galcit.caltech.edu> To: rsync at lists.samba.org Subject:
> --link-dest when target and compare_dir both have file
>
> Hi J.W. et al,
>
> Kevin Everets was kind enough to inform
17 matches
Mail list logo