Re: should rsync also be called ssync?

2001-02-15 Thread Michael James
>How does everybody (especially Martin and Tridge) feel about the idea of >rsync defaulting to "-e ssh" if it is invoked under the name ssync? Around >here everybody is being told they should stop using r* commands and start >using the s* equivalents so it seems a natural changeover. If there is

Re: What's the difference b/w these 2 commands?

2001-02-06 Thread Michael James
> A trailing / on a source directory name means > "copy the contents of this directory". > Without a trailing slash it means "copy the directory". > >I can't help but think that perhaps we need to change the UI by, for >example, adding a switch called --copy-directory-co

Compiling rsync with ssh as the default instead of rsh

2001-01-29 Thread Michael James
and verse. ... Some testing later... Hacking rsync.h to say #define RSYNC_RSH 'ssh' seems to work. michaelj -- Michael James _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ v +61 2 6125 8318 Network Programmer _/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Coombs Computing _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _

Rsync passing over atimes

2001-01-25 Thread Michael James
ehaviour I would like to be able to set up is: - pass over any files whose mtimes and size match (don't touch atime) - pass over any files whose checksums match (yes, update atime) - backup only real contents change Anybody know a way? Any comments