Re: Rsync 3.2.3pre1 released

being to have packages distributed without these features enabled. > FreeBSD 11.4 and 12: >pkg install cmark liblz4 openssl py37-cmarkgfm py37-xxhash zstd > FreeBSD 13: >pkg install cmark cmarkgfm liblz4 openssl py37-xxhash zstd Not sure you need py37-xxhash, xxhash shold be enou

Re: [PATCH] SSE2/SSSE3 optimized version of get_checksum1() for x86-64

h sender and receiver, but yes we may then use a faster (even perhaps hardware-backed) solution. Ben -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: [PATCH] SSE2/SSSE3 optimized version of get_checksum1() for x86-64

Thank you Jorrit for your detailed answer. > On 18 May 2020, at 17:58, Jorrit Jongma via rsync > wrote: > > Well, don't get too excited, get_checksum1() (the function optimized > here) is not the great performance limiter in this case, it's > get_checksum2() and sum_update(), which will be usin

Re: [PATCH] SSE2/SSSE3 optimized version of get_checksum1() for x86-64

> On 18 May 2020, at 17:06, Jorrit Jongma via rsync > wrote: > > This drop-in patch increases the performance of the get_checksum1() > function on x86-64. As ref, rather related to this : https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13082 Than

Re: Enabling easier contributions to rsync

patches being submitted (e.g. faster checksums) > which many others could really use... +1 for GitHub, would really be convenient ! Wayne, time to switch ? :-) Ben -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.

Re: --link-dest. Time to 'building file list' incrementing

Hi, As you are on Cygwin, you should consider the notexec & noacl mount options : https://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using.html#mount-table <https://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using.html#mount-table> They impact stat() performance. Ben > On 8 Jan 2019, at 10:56, John Simpson via

Re: rsync of a reflink from OCFS2

Yes you're right, rsync would update only a few parts of the file, but network usage would be even worst. The only solution would finally be to have rsync on the target system. Ben On 14 Mar, Kevin Korb via rsync wrote: --no-whole-file would only make it even worse. It would have to

Re: rsync of a reflink from OCFS2

On 14 Mar 2018, Lentes, Bernd via rsync wrote: - On Mar 14, 2018, at 2:19 PM, Ben RUBSON ben.rub...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 Mar 2018, Lentes, Bernd via rsync wrote: I would now expect a rsync from the snap would transfer just some megay bytes to the file from the day before. But it

Re: rsync of a reflink from OCFS2

ackup/cluster/test Hi Bernd, When doing rsync locally, diff alg is not involved, this is why file is fully transferred. Ben -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before po

Re: file contents cause rsync to fail (with certains args and dir structure)

platforms (FreeBSD...) should not then be impacted. Ben -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: Rsync and client-side encryption of files

On 11 Jan 2018 03:29, H via rsync wrote: Is anyone using client-side encryption of files before transferring them to a cloud server using Rsync? I am running CentOS.-- A solution could be EncFS in reverse mode. Ben -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list

Re: Rsync and client-side encryption of files

On 18-01-10 21:29:18, H via rsync wrote: Is anyone using client-side encryption of files before transferring them to a cloud server using Rsync? I am running CentOS. Yeah, in some cases I use borgbackup then rsync the borg repository over. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid o

Re: rsync does hours of "fake-work" after failure

> On 06 Oct 2017, at 13:18, Frank Steiner wrote: > > Ben RUBSON wrote >> >> I encountered same issue and proposed the following patch : >> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12525 > > Sorry, I really missed that as my search keywords were completely

Re: rsync does hours of "fake-work" after failure

s the output of a little test that can easily be reprocuded. > Is this a known bug? I couldn't find something similar in bugzilla > or the mailinglist archives. Hi, I encountered same issue and proposed the following patch : https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12525 Perhaps y

Re: [Bug 12819] [PATCH] sync() on receiving side for data consistency

> On 15 Jun 2017, at 19:29, Karl O. Pinc via rsync > wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:23:44 + > just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync > wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12819 >> >> --- Comment #7 from Ben RUBS

Re: Huge directory tree: Get files to sync via tools like sysdig

> On 10 Feb 2017, at 01:21, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:38:32 +1300 > Henri Shustak wrote: > >> As Ben mentioned, ZFS snapshots is one possible approach. Another >> approach is to have a faster storage system. I have seen considerable >>

Re: Huge directory tree: Get files to sync via tools like sysdig

> On 09 Feb 2017, at 16:10, Thomas Güttler wrote: > > Am 09.02.2017 um 11:05 schrieb Ben RUBSON: >>> On 09 Feb 2017, at 10:05, Thomas Güttler >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> we have a huge directory tree. >>> >&g

Re: Huge directory tree: Get files to sync via tools like sysdig

cover the > changed files. Hi, On which type of FS is this directory ? Ben -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: link-dest + fuzzy twice = vanished

I just submitted a bug report : https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12489 -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-

link-dest + fuzzy twice = vanished

th rsync 3.1.2. Thank you very much for your help ! Best regards, Ben -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

link-dest / checksum / db.diff

? - Is the checksum the table key, to speed-up the research ? Is there any third option ? I see many checksum / link-dest patches in rsync-patches-3.0.9.tar.gz, anything more efficient than db.diff ? Thank you very much for your help, Best regards, Ben -- Please use reply-all for most replies

Re: rsync using huge traffic

Hey, I've tested your advise for a few days now but is seems like the problem isn't solved. The traffice is now lower, about 15GB per backup, but still 4 times bigger than the whole data on the server. Is there an other option of rsync I can give a try. Regards, Ben Oswald Am Thu, 2

rsync using huge traffic

4GB of transmitted data at the end of the rsync call. So is there a known reason for this behaviour of rsync and if yes how can I solve this problem? Best regards, Ben -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.sa

Maximum number of entries in a filter file

symtimes Thanks in advance for any help. Regards Ben -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: FADV_DONTNEED support

Ben Gamari writes: > While going through an old todo list I found that these patches had fallen by > the way-side. About a year ago I initiated a discussion[1] with the Linux > kernel folks regarding the lack of any useable fadvise support on the kernel > side. As a result, I w

[PATCH 3/3] Inform kernel of FADV_DONTNEED hint in receiver

Use the FADV_DONTNEED fadvise hint after finishing writing to a destinataion fd in the receiver. --- receiver.c |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/receiver.c b/receiver.c index d90fa25..b151cf8 100644 --- a/receiver.c +++ b/receiver.c @@ -742,6 +742,12 @@

[PATCH 2/3] Inform kernel of FADV_DONTNEED hint in sender

Use the FADV_DONTNEED fadvise hint after finishing reading an origin fd in the sender. --- sender.c |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/sender.c b/sender.c index 59dae7d..e442933 100644 --- a/sender.c +++ b/sender.c @@ -338,6 +338,12 @@ void send_files(int

[PATCH 1/3] Add fadvise interface wrapper

With recent discussion on the LKML[1], it seems likely that Linux will finally support posix_fadvise in a useful way with the FADV_DONTNEED flag. This should allow us to minimize the effect of rsync on the system's working set. Add the necessary wrapper to syscall.c. [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/

FADV_DONTNEED support

nally although it could be conditioned on a flag if this is deemed more inappropriate. Cheers, - Ben [1] http://marc.info/?l=rsync&m=128885034930933&w=2 [2] http://insights.oetiker.ch/linux/fadvise.html [3] http://kernel.opensuse.org/cgit/kernel/commit/?id=315601809d124d046abd6c3ffa3

Ignoring /boot

RSYNC_USER="bs" RSYNC_SERVER="192.168.6.6" RSYNC_MODULE="ben-desktop" RSYNC_PATH="/" RSYNC_EXCLUDES="--exclude=/usr/portage/distfiles --exclude=/tmp --exclude=/var --exclude=/home --exclude=/root --exclude=/usr --exclude=/bin --exclude=/opt --excl$ MOUNT_FOR_R

rsync over ssh with post-zfer

Hi, I have install rsync version 3.0.8 on my FreeBSD server. I've set it up so that I have to connect via ssh with key based authentication. The following is my rsyncd.conf file in my home directory on the server. [ben-desktop] use chroot = no path = /home/bs/backups/ben-desktop/cu

rsync: on remote machine: --time-limit=4: unknown option

nc to just quit after specified amount of time and continue where it left off the next day. Thank you Ben Bogart -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read:

[PATCH 3/3] Inform kernel of FADV_DONTNEED hint in receiver

Use the FADV_DONTNEED fadvise hint after finishing writing to a destinataion fd in the receiver. --- receiver.c |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/receiver.c b/receiver.c index 39c5e49..33b21fb 100644 --- a/receiver.c +++ b/receiver.c @@ -721,6 +721,12 @@

[PATCH 2/3] Inform kernel of FADV_DONTNEED hint in sender

Use the FADV_DONTNEED fadvise hint after finishing reading an origin fd in the sender. --- sender.c |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/sender.c b/sender.c index 59dae7d..a934bfe 100644 --- a/sender.c +++ b/sender.c @@ -338,6 +338,12 @@ void send_files(int

[PATCH 1/3] Add fadvise interface wrapper

With recent discussion on the LKML[1], it seems likely that Linux will finally support posix_fadvise in a useful way with the FADV_DONTNEED flag. This should allow us to minimize the effect of rsync on the system's working set. Add the necessary wrapper to syscall.c. [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/

[RFC PATCH] fadvise support in rsync

first post and disable this unbelievably counterproductive "feature"? Thanks! Cheers, - Ben On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:49:49 -0500, Ben Gamari wrote: > > Warning for kernel folks: I'm not much of an mm person; let me know if I got > anything horribly wrong. > > Many fo

[RFC PATCH] fadvise support in rsync

potential negative effects of using FADV_DONTNEED on older kernels, it is likely we will want this functionality off by default with a command line flag to enable. Cheers, - Ben [1] http://insights.oetiker.ch/linux/fadvise.html [2] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/21/59 -- Please use reply-al

Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof)

with my backup use-case though. I'll just have to think of an objective way of measuring the result. - Ben -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http:

Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof)

needs so I'll shut up now. Thanks! - Ben -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof)

omplicated^M^M^M^Mhacky to be considered merge-worthy. Considering the number of Google hits returned for fadvise, I wouldn't be surprised if there were countless other projects with this same difficulty. We want to be able to tell the kernel about our useage patterns, but the kernel won&#

fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof)

ement this functionality in the near future? It seems like the utility of fadvise is severely limited by lacking support for NOREUSE. Cheers, - Ben [1] http://insights.oetiker.ch/linux/fadvise.html [2] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/mm/fadvise.c?a=avr32 [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse

How to let rsync detect file RENAMEs

the new, renamed file should be copied? This should work regardsless on which side/partner dir tree the rename took place. Which parameters do I have to use? Thank you Ben -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https

Where to download the rsync binaries for Windows but NOT the cwrsync version?

site for the newest rsync for windows? Ben -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: v3.0.4 OS X Execution Errors

I don't think this is Mac specific - I am getting it between two FreeBSD Machines - I don't know if this helps you at all. cheers Ben Henri S wrote: > > I agree with Matt it looks like the old version is still in use. > > If you would like to run backups with rsync

Re: accented characters in filenames mangled when rsyncing to a samba share

heers, Ben On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Ben Kenward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I am having a problem rsyncing files with accents in the names. I've > seen similar problems reported a few times before in the archives but > they didn't seem to be refe

accented characters in filenames mangled when rsyncing to a samba share

d characters, around 10 or so copies of them are created, each with varying numbers of the box special character. I would very much appreciate if anyone could help me with this! I am happy to provide more detailed information on request. Cheers, Ben -- Dr. Ben Kenward Department of Psychology

Feature request: Store diffed files separately.

ged files again which will save space. Ben Wilber -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

RE: How to avoid loosing rsync temp/partial files

@lists.samba.org Cc: Shani Ben - Avraham; Greg Pendler; Ofer Sofer Subject: How to avoid loosing rsync temp/partial files Hallo, I am using rsync to copy remote files into a local directory. I use the following flags: "--remove-sent-files --partial-dir=/tmp --partial --temp-dir=/tmp --b

RE: How to avoid loosing rsync temp/partial files

. What do you say? Shani From: Shushu Inbar שושו ענבר [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 12:46 PM To: rsync@lists.samba.org Cc: Shani Ben - Avraham; Greg Pendler; Ofer Sofer Subject: How to avoid loosing rsync temp/partial files Hallo

Symbian s60v3 port (1/2 working?)

Hi, I now have a port of rsync running on Symbian S60v3 (with openc/pips) which works in both directions :) It is setup to run in daemon mode on the phone and only allow connections from localhost, with remote access granted through reverse ssh port forwarding or a similar VPN technology. For

Are extended attributes supported under cygwin for rsync 3.0 pre2 ?

Windows box to a Linux box and preserve all Windows ACL's, ownership, xattrs, policy info, etc. for the file so that when it's restored, all that gets restored with it). Thanks much, Ben Anderson -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Rsync to two locations?

Hi, I've been trying to make the following work with no success. I want to rsync DIR-A to DIR-B and also have the delta files/folders also goto DIR-C. Any ideas? Ben -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.cat

Question about deleting a file from the server via Rsync

on the receiving side that are excluded" Any thoughts on where I might be going wrong here?  Or is there some other method for doing this (deleting a file or folder from the server that still exists on the client)? Thanks! Ben Here's the log... Tunnel: ssh Command to run: "

Using long file names in an Exclude file is causing Rsync to loop.

small exclude file that has a really long file name in one include rule. The exclude file looks like this: + /cygdrive/D/.ben/ + /cygdrive/D/.ben/This is a really really really long name for a file that has to be beyond 250 bytes in length the reason I am doing this is to test rsync transfers of

rsync transferring identical files

ix" the problem for those files, even though they have identical timestamps and sizes as before. Is there anything I can do to avoid having to run this again for a week? All the best, Ben -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before

Re: incremental backup help required

ackups for you > http://rsyncbackup.erlang.no I've made a list of all the rsync incremental backup programs I know of :-) See http://rdiff-backup.nongnu.org/related.html#rsync-scripts -- Ben Escoto pgpcJPyAvoTK2.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe or change option

Re: @ERROR: access denied

No, the line is there: username:password in /etc/rsyncd.secrets. >The username:password line in /etc/rsyncd.secrets? >Or the >export RSYNC_PASSWORD=... >setting before invocing the rsync command? WTF? -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Befor

@ERROR: access denied

(71 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(189) What am I missing here? Thanks, Ben -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Prescription Drugs

Top 10 meds bought online http://rpqnx.gvj92hgrv8go2hg.orbletmcagi.com -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: trouble with chmod on certain symlinks

have not tried this myself. Hope this helps. Ben - diff -u -r1.1.1.6 rsync.c --- rsync.c 3 Jan 2004 11:22:00 - 1.1.1.6 +++ rsync.c 21 Dec 2004 12:04:56 - @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ change to groups that the user is a member of */ chang

rsync, Linux, ACLs

Am I correct in thinking that rsync does not currently support ACLs on Linux? I see that there have been occasional efforts to patch rsync to support ACLs. Can anyone recommend a particular patch? Thanks in advance. -- Ben Rosengart(212) 741-4400

2.6.0 backwards compatibility

ns of rsync. At our site, we do have 2.5.7 and 2.5.6 installed. Are there any documented problems when using 2.6.0 with a down revved version on another system? Thanks much, Ben Piela Please do not transmit orders or instructions regarding a UBS account by email. The information provided in

Re: Adding support for versioned files in rsync

s about it. And since I'm posting this I might as well mention my project at http://rdiff-backup.stanford.edu. It does versions and uses the rsync algorithm, but doesn't notice duplicate files. -- Ben Escoto pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe or change options: h

Re: FW: rsync performance

dly dubious. The description was slightly unclear; the numbers in the first group indicate copying into an empty directory, so both processed the same number of files. > I believe the speed complaint had to do with files that have > significant amounts of data in them. My remark was off-topi

Re: FW: rsync performance

27;ve been surprised at how fast rsync can copy locally. For instance, http://mail.nongnu.org/archive/html/rdiff-backup-users/2002-12/msg00066.html finds 'rsync -aH --delete' faster than 'cp -a'. Perhaps though this was some idiosyncracy of my test (the main purpose wasn

Re: Linux Rsync so files

not moving *.so files.. Any idea what I am doing wrong? Try adding more options, like this: rsync -lHtSuWvzPh6rvSqrjJ32opEXnbNZglDsp -e ssh -C [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/gameservers / -- Ben Escoto -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: Oops more testing was required....

arate utility couldn't do it). Even for the daemon, maybe it could be run over some bandwidth limiting proxy or something, if the OS couldn't limit the bandwidth directly. -- Ben Escoto pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: patch draft for extended attributes on linux

txattr, but this will fail because only "user.xxx" attributes can be set with setxattr. But I could be wrong in a number of places, because I'm not sure about the behavior of setxattr, and I just skimmed the patch quickly. -- Ben Escoto pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Copying EAs and ACLs

s thinking that maybe the file's format could be the same as the (gzipped) output of getfattr/getfacl --recursive. That would make things more compatible, but may be slightly inefficient compared to some other format. Also there may be no point if the getf[attr/acl] format is likely to

Re: Copying EAs and ACLs

How many bytes per file on average do you think EAs/ACLs will take up? -- Ben Escoto pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: Copying EAs and ACLs

UNIX. On the rdiff-backup mailing list I referenced your message and got this response: -- From: Greg Freemyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:00:23 -0500 (15:00 PST) To: Ben Escoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: rsync in-place (was Re: rsync 1tb+ each day)

original. My understanding is > that mv is atomic under unix, so this action either happens in its > entirety or not at all. Even if mv is atomic, how does rsync make sure that the move doesn't happen before the last of the data is written to the tempfile? Does it explicity fsy

Re: rsync in-place (was Re: rsync 1tb+ each day)

r. Rsync CB> currently ensures that every file is either the original or new. I'm curious, how does it ensure this? -- Ben Escoto msg06453/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: am I missing something, or are permissions always preserved?

Well that's annoying. I've tried changing the encoding of this attempt... maybe it'll get through this time. As a rule of thumb, I think silent errors a very bad idea. It means things might not be behaving like you expect, but you have no idea. In general, rsync's current behavior is correct. In m

RE: am I missing something, or are permissions always preserved?

2003-01-01 at 07:13, Green, Paul wrote: > Ben [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > I'm relatively new to rsync, but it seems to me that if there's an > > option to perserve permissions and you don't set it, then rsync > > shouldn't do anything with permiss

Re: am I missing something, or are permissions always preserved?

pecified? > > - Dave > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:31:07PM -0800, Ben wrote: > > Yeah, my problem is that the chmod fails, so then rsync complains not > > everything worked as expected. Because I'm writing files to a network > > mount with forced permissions

Re: am I missing something, or are permissions always preserved?

the issue that you rather have it always create file > permissions based only on umask? In that case I don't know how it would > know whether or not to turn on the executable permission, among other > problems. What exactly would your proposed flag do? > > - Dave > > &g

Re: am I missing something, or are permissions always preserved?

uot;? Do the destination files already exist? > It is supposed to preserve existing permissions on destination files > when you don't use -p. > > - Dave > > On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 06:44:24PM -0800, Ben wrote: > > Hmmm... while that makes sense, that doesn&#

Re: am I missing something, or are permissions always preserved?

ady exists and preserve_perms > isn't set, the original permissions should be preserved. > > - Dave > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 12:30:55PM -0800, Ben wrote: > > They seem to be for me, even when I don't pass in the --perms flag. This > > is a problem because I&#

am I missing something, or are permissions always preserved?

They seem to be for me, even when I don't pass in the --perms flag. This is a problem because I'm rsyncing to a samba mount with fixed permissions. Looking at rsync.c (for version 2.5.5) starting at line 204, I see this code snippet: #ifdef HAVE_CHMOD if (!S_ISLNK(st->st_mode)) { if (

Re: rsync's internal "virtual file system"

conds of wasted scanning time for doing small (e.g. single file in middle of tree) accesses, but this would be acceptable in most cases. Having a more complicated format could make arbitrary accesses faster, but what would this format be, and would it allow for the data be compressed? -- Ben Escoto msg05609/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

rsync's internal "virtual file system"

from fixed record lengths wouldn't outweigh the loss of flexibility. Would XML be overkill? Thanks for any insight. -- Ben Escoto msg05607/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

offline rsync - rdiff/rdiffdir

combines multiple rdiff signatures or deltas in tar format files. See http://www.nongnu.org/duplicity/ for more information or to download. -- Ben Escoto msg05474/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: per sync size limit

that rsync would react all that well (older versions have been JWS> known to go runaway). You could also try this with rdiff-backup. It is slower than rsync but when a connection gets dropped it can resume it next time where it left off. -- Ben Escoto msg05410/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: rsync vs. iOra

I don't know how feasible this would be...any ideas? You could check out rdiff/rdiffdir. They also let you create rsync-style signature and diffs offline. -- Ben Escoto msg05308/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: superlifter design notes (OpenVMS perspective)

f the filename over the limit. If I had to do it over I probably would have skipped this feature (or at least wait until lots of people bothered me about it). -- Ben Escoto msg04693/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: superlifter design notes and rZync feedback

be a better lower limit in your design WD> thinking. For what it's worth, if I understand what you mean by "active names" correctly, I believe rdiff-backup's protocol can sometimes have hundreds of active names. -- Ben Escoto -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: strip setuid/setgid bits on backup (was Re: smallsecurity-related rsync extension)

it easy enough to work with (say with the scripting support, simple APIs) I'm sure other people will dream cool stuff up. This message is longer than I intended - it's always dangerous to write volumes on something I know nothing about :-) -- Ben Escoto signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: strip setuid/setgid bits on backup (was Re: smallsecurity-related rsync extension)

s" as one of the planned features of rsync3, or at least something about the whole structure being very flexible. -- Ben Escoto signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: extension of rsync on crypted files

from rsync since on the server you wouldn't see the files x0, x1, x2, ... but rather the files x0, d1, d2, ... where d1 is a some kind of delta from x0 to x1 (or I suppose an encrypted delta from v0 to v1)? Or have I misunderstood your system? -- Ben Escoto msg04442/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Compressed backup

>>>>> "BE" == Ben Escoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> wrote the following on Tue, 04 Jun 2002 10:02:58 -0700 KE> When I finally took the time to properly read Rusty's KE> "gzip-rsyncable" patch[1] while writing this mail, I

Re: Compressed backup

own in. His would trigger a reset after any block of 4096 identical characters. Anyway, that is just an example, the mod 4096 scheme seems to be "more random" and less data dependent than yours, but I don't have a good way of saying this clearly, or proving that his

Re: modules madness / ssh regardless of daemon

hat, -e ssh renders rsyncd.conf useless (hosts access, auth users, > > etc.). :-\ You can use public key authentication to use SSH as the transport for unattended scripting of rsync over ssh. I do it with a number of machines. Ben Ricker System Administrator Wellinx.com

Re: rsync: Re: using rsync to backup windows workstations

7; you keys file. 'authorized_keys' is for ssh 1. You can change the -e option to "-e 'ssh 1'" to use auhtorized_keys (I believe that is the command line; I got ssh 1 doing authentication but I switched to 2 because it is much more secure). Ben Ricker System Administrator Wellinx.com

Re: Using rsync to mirror a hard drive.

ng 'n' on the end of the parameters for 'dry run'. It will show you all the files it will sync. Ben Ricker System Administrator Wellinx.com On Mon, 2001-10-22 at 12:37, Thaddeus L. Olczyk wrote: > One of the problems that I get ( which I'm not yet seriously tackling

Re: Re[2]: Rsync Throughput issues

t. I noticed that when rsync was running, there was a considerable I/O wait (at one point, it was at 98%!). We installed Rsync from a binary dist, not compiled. I assume by your use of "build" that you compiled from source? Ben Ricker System Administrator Wellinx.com

Re: Re[2]: Rsync Throughput issues

, it looks like the problem is with Rsync for AIX. We use the binary install. Someone suggested compiling rsync from source. Has anyone else run rsync on AIX? Ben Ricker System Administrator Wellinx.com On Tue, 2001-10-09 at 12:01, Rusty Carruth wrote: > (Courtesy copy sent directly to

Rsync Throughput issues

speeds? Could there be something on the App switch throttling rsync for some reason? Any thought will help, Ben Ricker System Administrator Wellinx.com

Re: Instructions on how rsync uses ssh to run remotely?

ould be nice to have a primer on designing a protocol like this, since I'm sure many people have already figured out the best way to handle latency, errors, etc. -- Ben Escoto

Instructions on how rsync uses ssh to run remotely?

sh in the way rsync does, I would appreciate a reference. I could look at the rsync source, but it doesn't seem to be overly commented, and I'm not exactly fluent in C and thought that this post might save me time in any event. Thanks. -- Ben Escoto

  1   2   >