On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:09:29 +0900 (JST), KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > Because we have an alternative solution already. please try memcgroup :) > Alright, fair enough. It still seems like there are many cases where fadvise seems more appropriate, but memcg should at least satisfy my personal needs so I'll shut up now. Thanks!
- Ben -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
