On 06/20/2012 10:40:57 PM, Kevin Korb wrote:
> On 06/20/12 21:53, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > On 06/20/2012 05:29:09 PM, Kevin Korb wrote:
> > Somehow or another you need root access on the remote side in order
> > to properly set permissions.
> Not permissions, ownership.
Quite right. I shouldn'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/20/12 21:53, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 06/20/2012 05:29:09 PM, Kevin Korb wrote:
>> http://www.sanitarium.net/rsyncfaq/#sudo
>
> Along these lines...
>
> Somehow or another you need root access on the remote side in order
> to properly set permi
On 06/20/2012 05:29:09 PM, Kevin Korb wrote:
> http://www.sanitarium.net/rsyncfaq/#sudo
Along these lines...
Somehow or another you need root access on the
remote side in order to properly set permissions.
You can use ssh public keys to invoke a rsync daemon.
In /root/.ssh/authorized_keys you put
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.sanitarium.net/rsyncfaq/#sudo
On 06/20/12 18:26, PEOPLES, MICHAEL P wrote:
> I have spent a day researching and attempting to debug this issue.
> I am hoping someone can tell me how (or disabuse me of the delusion
> that it's possible) to d
I have spent a day researching and attempting to debug this issue. I am hoping
someone can tell me how (or disabuse me of the delusion that it's possible) to
do the following:
- Mirror the contents of a directory on one server to a remote server where
there are diverse ownership and permission
If that's a concern, then you could just use a service like dyndns to get
an address that's reliable. For non-commercial use, it's free.
Joe
> Because the connection is very unreliable, laptop 2 has a
> dynamic IP, and I am paranoiac and don't want to have
>
> sshd: ALL
>
> in hosts.allow on Lap
Uwe Brauer wrote (June 20, 2012 12:57 PM):
> >> On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:50:00 +, "Voelker, Bernhard"
> >> wrote:
>
>>> Oh I see misunderstanding then. So what you propose is
>>> basically a chown of the directory in question?
>
>> no.
>
>
> Why not? I am confused.
>
> If I do, as
>> On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:50:00 +, "Voelker, Bernhard"
>> wrote:
>> Oh I see misunderstanding then. So what you propose is
>> basically a chown of the directory in question?
> no.
Why not? I am confused.
If I do, as user1 knowing passwd user2
Laptop1
rsync -auvz /home/oub/sour
