Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof)

2010-11-13 Thread Ben Gamari
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:09:29 +0900 (JST), KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > Because we have an alternative solution already. please try memcgroup :) > Alright, fair enough. It still seems like there are many cases where fadvise seems more appropriate, but memcg should at least satisfy my personal needs s

Re: ZFS NFSv4 ACLs Support

2010-11-13 Thread grarpamp
> I've noticed that rsync does not currently support ZFS NFSv4 ACLs. If I were > to create a patch to enable support, would rsync accept it or should I > submit the patch to IllumOS? Either way, I'll be creating a patch. I just > want to know if upstream would like the patch. Surely many ZFS users

ZFS NFSv4 ACLs Support

2010-11-13 Thread Shawn Webb
Hey all, I've noticed that rsync does not currently support ZFS NFSv4 ACLs. If I were to create a patch to enable support, would rsync accept it or should I submit the patch to IllumOS? Either way, I'll be creating a patch. I just want to know if upstream would like the patch. Thanks, Shawn --