On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Gerald Holl wrote:
> cmd[9]=-vvvLogtprze.iL
>
The presence of the 'i' in the -e.iL option that was sent means that the
client believes that incremental recurse is possible. The server side must
be sending back a flag that indicates that it believes that it
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7057
--- Comment #11 from way...@samba.org 2010-03-26 19:16 CST ---
Created an attachment (id=5553)
--> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=5553&action=view)
Vary the final dir len (creates 3 final dirs) and puts 3 files in those d
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7057
--- Comment #10 from way...@samba.org 2010-03-26 19:06 CST ---
Created an attachment (id=5551)
--> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=5551&action=view)
My fix for the issue.
Here's the patch that was committed to both the b3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7057
way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Wed 24 Mar 2010, Gerald Holl wrote:
>
>> Maybe it's because of too many files? The file list consists of
>> approx. 450.000 items.
>
> Incremental recursion works per directory.
> If all those 450.000 files are in one directory, then incremental
> recursion won't help.
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Vitaly V. Ganusov wrote:
> However, it seems like a very messy way to sync a given file (by
> excluding bunch of other files that are not needed). Would you suggest
> a better way? Could you suggest a simple way/script to generate such
> a file (see attached) with only a f
