On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Gerald Holl <ger...@holl.co.at> wrote:
> cmd[9]=-vvvvvvvLogtprze.iL
>
The presence of the 'i' in the -e.iL option that was sent means that the
client believes that incremental recurse is possible. The server side must
be sending back a flag that indicates that it believes that it is not. I'd
suggest looking to see if the "rsync" on the path is a script (or alias)
that tries to force extra options (such as --delay-updates or
--prune-empty-dirs) or something that strips away the -e.iL option. You
could work around such a situation by specifying --rsync-path=/usr/bin/rsync
(or what path you need). If none of that works, you could add some
fprintf(stderr, "...\n") statements to the set_allow_inc_recurse() routine
in compat.c to see what is triggering the allow_inc_recurse = 0 setting.
Something like this:
client_info = shell_cmd ? shell_cmd : "";
fprintf(stderr, "[%s] allow_inc_recurse=%d, recurse=%d, use_qsort=%d,
delete_before=%d, delete_after=%d, delay_updates=%d, prune_empty_dirs=%d,
client_info='%s'\n", who_am_i(), allow_inc_recurse, recurse, use_qsort,
delete_before, delete_after, delay_updates, prune_empty_dirs, client_info);
/* added */
if (!recurse || use_qsort)
allow_inc_recurse = 0;
..wayne..
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
