Re: using -v and -q together

2006-05-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 13 May 2006 20:26, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 04:27:02PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > seems the behavior of rsync has changed when dealing with output and > > using both -v and -q at the same time > > This comes about because of the new rprintf() enums that the n

Re: using -v and -q together

2006-05-13 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 04:27:02PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > seems the behavior of rsync has changed when dealing with output and using > both -v and -q at the same time This comes about because of the new rprintf() enums that the newer code is using, especially the latest CVS version, which

using -v and -q together

2006-05-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
seems the behavior of rsync has changed when dealing with output and using both -v and -q at the same time ... for example: $ mkdir test1 $ touch test1/foo $ rsync-2.6.0 -avq test1 test2 $ rm -r test2 $ rsync-2.6.8 -avq test1 test2 test1/ test1/fo $ rm -r test2 $ rsync-cvs -avq test1 test2 buildin

Re: Usage of a telnet client instead of ssh or rsh

2006-05-13 Thread Jamie Lokier
Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Sat, 2006-05-13 20:27:03 +0200, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri 12 May 2006, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > > Wayne beat me to it. But I was going to say, you might be able to write > > > a wrapper script that sends the rsync command and arguments down

Re: Usage of a telnet client instead of ssh or rsh

2006-05-13 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Sat, 2006-05-13 20:27:03 +0200, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri 12 May 2006, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > Wayne beat me to it. But I was going to say, you might be able to write > > a wrapper script that sends the rsync command and arguments down the > > telnet connection for the

Re: Usage of a telnet client instead of ssh or rsh

2006-05-13 Thread Paul Slootman
On Fri 12 May 2006, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > Wayne beat me to it. But I was going to say, you might be able to write > a wrapper script that sends the rsync command and arguments down the > telnet connection for the shell to execute and discards any extra output > produced by the shell while log

Re: Issue with hard links, please help!

2006-05-13 Thread Paul Slootman
On Sat 13 May 2006, Max Kipness wrote: > I still can't seem to figure out why the hard links are breaking though. > And now I've noticed that I have similar issues on other server with > hard links (evidently). > In one instance, the server has maybe 600mb or so of changes per day, > and a total

RE: Issue with hard links, please help!

2006-05-13 Thread Max Kipness
> On Thu 11 May 2006, Max Kipness wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] backup]# cp -al Latest/ mtest/ > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] backup]# du --max-depth=1 -h > > 21G ./Latest > > 8.7M./mtest > > 21G . > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] backup]# rm mtest/ -rf > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] backup]# cp -al Latest/ test/

Test

2006-05-13 Thread Richard Taubo
Hi! Just testing, sorry for the inconvenience. Richard Taubo -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

RE: New option: --progress-newline

2006-05-13 Thread Ryan T. Sammartino
Well... shouldn't be that much of a problem? Putting this tr command in the pipe should help: tr '\r' '\n' You assume I am working in a sane environment. :) A bigger issue may be that output is buffered when writing into a pipe, which means you only get rsync's output when the buffer is