Re: Proposal: cache directory tagging convention

2004-07-20 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 10:31:47AM -0400, Anthony Iano-Fletcher wrote: > A while back John Bowman released a more general solution to > this problem. He added an extra option: > --rsync-exclude=FILE > [...] Was this patch ever rolled into the main line distribution? The was promoted to the "

Re: Rsync : symlink issue

2004-07-20 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 05:05:33PM -0400, Linux wrote: > rsync error: some files could not be transferred (code 23) at main.c(1045) Look in the logfile for the messages that the daemon output (typically in your syslog). It's likely that the files themselves were not readable by the rsync daemon,

Re: HP-UX 11i and largefiles on rsync 2.6.2

2004-07-20 Thread Craig Barratt
"Don Malloy" writes: > I just tried the build from the nightly tar file: > rsync-HEAD-20040720-1929GMT.tar.gz > > It failed at 2144075776 bytes each time I tried. I've attached the tail from > the tusc again. Here it the output of the rsync: I haven't been f

Re: Rsync : symlink issue

2004-07-20 Thread Linux
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 16:01, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 03:49:10PM -0400, Linux wrote: > > What would be the proper syntax to rsync the files that are on the > > other end of those symlinks. > > Use --copy-links (-L). If that fails then rsync probably doesn't have > permissio

Re: HP-UX 11i and largefiles on rsync 2.6.2

2004-07-20 Thread Don Malloy
I just tried the build from the nightly tar file: rsync-HEAD-20040720-1929GMT.tar.gz It failed at 2144075776 bytes each time I tried. I've attached the tail from the tusc again. Here it the output of the rsync: server2 # /tmp/rsync -av --progress --stats file1.db /var/opt/ignit

Re: Rsync : symlink issue

2004-07-20 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 03:49:10PM -0400, Linux wrote: > What would be the proper syntax to rsync the files that are on the > other end of those symlinks. Use --copy-links (-L). If that fails then rsync probably doesn't have permissions to follow the symlink. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or cha

Rsync : symlink issue

2004-07-20 Thread Linux
Hello all . I think i'm missing something.. I've made a folder on the rsync server called symlinks. With in that folder is monday,tuesday,etc... Those folders contain symlinks to the backup files for that day. I want to transfer the files to a remote backup server. I must use the Folder w

Re: HP-UX 11i and largefiles on rsync 2.6.2

2004-07-20 Thread Wayne Davison
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 01:13:55PM -0400, Don Malloy wrote: > Interestingly enough, now it stops dead when it hits 2146631680 bytes > transferred. [...] Any ideas? I haven't been able to duplicate the problem you're seeing using the cvs version of rsync. I'll try a patched 2.6.2 next. You may wi

Re: Rsync: Directories become Symbolic Links

2004-07-20 Thread Wayne Davison
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 03:19:46PM -0400, Vu Huynh wrote: > My question is that how do we make rsync understands and update the > directory subdir1 becomes the symbolic link as in Server1. I believe you're looking for the --force option. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://list

RE: HP-UX 11i and largefiles on rsync 2.6.2

2004-07-20 Thread Don Malloy
Thanks to Steve and Michael for the help on using tusc in HP-UX land instead of strace. I have attached a tail of the output of the tusc (368 lines.) The whole thing is 412MB gzip'ed down to 20, so if someone wants the whole thing, it's yours, but you have to let me know where to send it. Comm

Re: [PATCH] Batch-mode rewrite

2004-07-20 Thread Wayne Davison
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 05:35:24PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > If I understand correctly, there's no reason to save the list into the > BATCH file. It only needs be in BATCH.sh. Yes. I think that is the most flexible way to go and that is what the current CVS code is doing. > Is there much

Re: [PATCH] Batch-mode rewrite

2004-07-20 Thread Wayne Davison
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 06:18:49PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > Ok, how about this: Instead of index notification, run the generator > and receiver serially. I had wondered about that too, but the problem is that the generator expects data from the receiver, so we'd need to add special code to

Re: Proposal: cache directory tagging convention

2004-07-20 Thread Anthony Iano-Fletcher
Hello Bryan et al, A while back John Bowman released a more general solution to this problem. He added an extra option: --rsync-exclude=FILE that caused rsync to take notice of a per-directory excludes file. Your problem is solved by this patch. Run rsync with --rsync-exclude=.backup and

Proposal: cache directory tagging convention

2004-07-20 Thread Bryan Ford
Hi rsync'ers, I'm soliciting feedback, discussion, and hopefully eventually support for a (currently very short and simple) proposal that would make it easier and more automatic for users to exclude from backups and other data transfers all the cache directories that various applications create