> Once synchronize a file. Does rscync first create a temporary in the
> remote machine first and then rename it? Or it direct write the difference
> into the dest-file?
>
> Could you please tell me what will happen to the dest-file when a rsync
> process interrupted by some problems(network prob
Wayne Davison writes:
> On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 02:25:11PM -0700, Craig Barratt wrote:
> > Any feedback on this patch and the possibility of getting it
> > into CVS or the patches directory?
>
> The file checksum-seed.diff was put into the patches dir on the 2nd of
> May. Strangely, I don't seem
in send_file_name(), there is:
if (write_batch)
file->flags |= FLAG_TOP_DIR;
Can anyone explain this? It results in the file flags sent to the
batch file differing from the ones sent to the recevier by that one
bit. But, why?
-chris
--
To unsubscribe or change
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 11:11:51AM -0400, Alberto Accomazzi wrote:
>
> Wayne Davison wrote:
> >
> >I'm wondering if batch mode should be removed from the main rsync
> >release and relegated to a parallel project? It seems to me that a
> >better feature for the mainstream utility would be somet
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 06:10, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:06:52AM -0400, Alberto Accomazzi wrote:
> > Chris Shoemaker wrote:
[...]
> > that the feature is useless, but just caution people that they need to
> > understand the assumptions that this use of rsync is based upon.
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:06:52AM -0400, Alberto Accomazzi wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>
> > Indeed, what you describe seems to have been the design motivation.
> > I
> >can share what my desired application is: I want to create a mirror of a
> >public server onto my local machine w
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 09:42:18PM -0700, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 05:18:10PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > BTW, there is a work-around. If you don't mind duplicating the mirror
> > twice, one solution is to do a regular (no --write-batch) rsync update of one
> > copy of
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 08:10:57PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 05:18:10PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > The "knowledge" or "memory" of that exact state is more likely to
> > reside with the receiver (who just left that state) than with the
> > sender (who may never hav
It appears that the command you show is not a complete copy/paste job.
When you changed "backup.amlaw.com" or whatever it was to
"backup.domain.com", you also removed one of the colons between that and
"jspfsp", as the only time rsync does a chroot is as a server.
A chroot failure is almost inva
That is it. The destination file is unaffected until rsync completes its
replacement, then the directory entry is repointed at the new file and the
reference to the old inode freed.
Tim Conway
Unix System Administration
Contractor - IBM Global Services
desk:3032734776
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi:
Wayne Davison wrote:
The "knowledge" or "memory" of that exact state is more likely to
reside with the receiver (who just left that state) than with the
sender (who may never have been in that state). Therefore it is more
likely to be useful to the receiver than to sender.
This is only true if y
On Sun, 9 May 2004, PaweÅ GoÅaszewski wrote:
>
> After upgrade from previous version I can't run rsync.
>
> 2004/05/09 10:40:54 [18630] rsyncd version 2.6.2 starting, listening on port 873
> 2004/05/09 10:40:54 [18630] rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at
> socket.c(466)
>
> strace sho
Chris Shoemaker wrote:
Indeed, what you describe seems to have been the design motivation. I
can share what my desired application is: I want to create a mirror of a
public server onto my local machine which physically disconnected from the
Internet, and keep it current. So, I intend to first rs
I am doing this to rsync a file:
rsync -avz
/usr/local/websphere/appserver/hosts/default_host/jsp/servers/includes/file1
.txt backup.domain.com:jspfsp >> /var/log/rsync_backup.log
I get these error:
@ERROR: chroot failed
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (34 bytes read so far)
rsync error: e
>I often post them to the mailing list, but the best place to find fixes
>is in the CVS version. (This fix has been in CVS since early May, for
>instance.) See the "NEWS" file from CVS for a good summary of what has
>changed.
Ok. Many thanks again!
Bye, Andy
--
Andreas Ley, Rechenzentrum, Uni
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:26:23AM +0200, Andreas Ley wrote:
> Bingo! This patch indeed fixes the problem. Is this an 'official' patch and
> is there an 'official' place to look for patches to released versions?
I often post them to the mailing list, but the best place to find fixes
is in the CVS
>http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2004-May/009380.html
Bingo! This patch indeed fixes the problem. Is this an 'official' patch and
is there an 'official' place to look for patches to released versions?
Many thnx, Andy
--
Andreas Ley, Rechenzentrum, Universitaet Karlsruhe, D-76128 Karlsruhe,
17 matches
Mail list logo
