On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 09:42:18PM -0700, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 05:18:10PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > BTW, there is a work-around. If you don't mind duplicating the mirror
> > twice, one solution is to do a regular (no --write-batch) rsync update of one
> > copy of the mirror, and then do the --write-batch during a local to local
> > rsync update of another copy of the mirror. Actually, this has some real
> > advantages if your network connection is unreliable.
>
> That was in fact the way I envisioned us using it at work, together with
> multicast-based batch file distribution (but the project never got off the
> ground).
>
Nice to know I'm not alone :-) Thanks for the report.
-chris
> --
> Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ Sunnyvale, CA
> _/ _/ _/
> _/ _/_/_/
> _/ _/ _/ _/
> jos at catnook.com _/_/ _/_/_/ require 'std/disclaimer'
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
