Apparently this initial email from 2 days ago got trapped by a probable
20K limit on email size, and was just now approved by the admin. In
the meantime a truncated version was sent that omitted some key info...
I have unwrapped the log lines for readability.
We've been on a wild goose chase, fe
On 23 Apr 2004, Jim Salter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a test message - my apologies for it, but everything I send is
> getting bounced.
Our spamfilter was a little too hasty. It should be OK now.
--
Martin
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/r
I have the latest rsync running on mandrake official 10. At 2:30 I run
rsync --daemon from cron to run an offsite backup for all my customers. At
8:00 I run killall rsync.
However my log files show the following:
2004/04/20 02:00:00 [2702] rsyncd version 2.6.0 starting, listening on port
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 11:38:10PM +, Jim Salter wrote:
> This is a test message - my apologies for it, but everything I send is
> getting bounced.
I've seen several messages from you on the list yesterday and today.
FYI.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/
This is a test message - my apologies for it, but everything I send is
getting bounced.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Tim already answered your question for you. Your remote system is not
answering on port 514, only on port 513. See your OS's rsh man page for
further details - this isn't really an rsync question, it's an rsh question.
However when I first give "rsh 66.123.34.123" and after remote login when i
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Wayne Davison wrote:
> Rsync doesn't call sqrt -- it just does a simple little integer
> estimation. It is probable that using a hardware sqrt call would be
> faster than rsync's estimator, but taking only 0.0041 seconds per
> file instead of 0.0232 seconds per file(*
Found a space after + /nflmg/scripts/regional/misc_loaders/ which caused the
subdirectory to be missed. Thanks a bunch for your example. That illustrated
the issue well. Once I got rid of the space and saw that your example did
work, it made it much easier to understand how the rules build. The key
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 03:21:10PM -0600, Peter L. Wargo wrote:
> IIRC, the G5 has hardware sqrt.
Rsync doesn't call sqrt -- it just does a simple little integer
estimation. It is probable that using a hardware sqrt call would be
faster than rsync's estimator, but taking only 0.0041 seconds p
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Paul Slootman wrote:
> I don't think that the overhead of one sqrt() per file will make much
> difference either way...
It might over tens of thousands of files... :-)
-Pete
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting,
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 04:13:19PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In, my config, why does [- /*] exclude
> [+ nflmg/scripts/regional/misc_loaders/] but not [+ bin/]?
It doesn't. Read what I wrote again. It excludes nflmg. The manpage
talks about how the algorithm is recursive -- all director
Hope, I'm not being a pain, but...
In, my config, why does [- /*] exclude [+
nflmg/scripts/regional/misc_loaders/] but not [+ bin/]?
Also, the config you gave me, still ignored [+
nflmg/scripts/regional/misc_loaders/]
Thanks,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Turner, Dave
Sent: Friday,
On Thu 22 Apr 2004, Peter L. Wargo wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Wayne Davison wrote:
>
> > * Per-file dynamic block size is now sqrt(file length). The
> Oooo... I need to go compile 2.6 on a G5 running OS X (unless somebody
> beat me to it). IIRC, the G5 has hardware sqrt. This could be q
On Fri 23 Apr 2004, Kurt Hornik wrote:
> Thanks. Do you think I should forward it to the Debian rsync package
> maintainer?
Don't bother, the Debian rsync maintainer is of course subscribed to the
rsync mailing list :-)
Anyhow, the patch will be in the upcoming 2.6.1 anyway, so there's no
real
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 03:18:16PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> + nflmg/scripts/regional/misc_loaders/
That rule is useless because your last rule excludes nflmg before it can
be scanned for files. Try this config file instead:
- core
- *.bz2
- *.orig
- *.BAK
- *.bak
- *.old
- *.csv
- *.tm
I have created two new files /export/home/bin/test_temp.delete_me and
/export/home/webmstr/nflmg/scripts/regional/misc_loaders/test_temp.delete_me
on the rsync server and am using the following exclude file.
+ bin/
+ nflmg/scripts/regional/misc_loaders/
- core
- *.bz2
- *.orig
- *.BAK
- *.bak
- *
Ok, I'd expected it to go once you could rsh host which rsync.
Since you're not getting a
+
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/local/admin/bin>rsync -e rsh --rsync-path=/usr/local/bin/rsync
hostwithoutrsync:/etc/services
sh: /usr/local/bin/rsync: no
Hello,
I uncommented shell in inetd.conf on the destination system.
The command " rsh 66.123.34.123 which rsync" is working fine now .
I get the output /usr/local/bin/rsync.
But the command:
rsync -avvznrbe rsh /sourcepath 66.123.34.123:/destinationpath
Still does not work. I get the s
However when I first give "rsh 66.123.34.123" and after remote login when i give
"which rsync" ; i get the following output
/usr/local/bin/rsync.
Jim Salter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Clearly, if you can't execute the "which" command remotely, rsh is _not_
working "perfectly fine." If you c
Ah! Now I've got you.
rsh without parameters does an rlogin, which uses the service commonly
called "login", on port 513.
With parameters, it does a plain rsh, using the service commonly called
"shell", on port 514.
Here's a system with both holes open (deep inside a well-protected
intranet, h
Hello,
when i gave "rsh 66.123.34.123 which rsync" at the source system i got the following
error
66.123.34.123: Connection refused
"rsh 66.123.34.123" works perfectly fine.
What could be the problem..?
Thanks,
Naveen.
Tim Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
rsh 66.123.34.123 which rsync
I e
rsh 66.123.34.123 which rsync
I expect you'll get something like "no rsync in /usr/bin /usr/ccs/bin
/usr/bin/X11 /usr/contrib/bin /usr/local/bin ." Some systems don't report
the remote shell connection open until the called remote program comes up,
so one missing from the path can look like a n
> Wayne Davison writes:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 08:34:55AM +0200, Kurt Hornik wrote:
>> Just checking: in essence you will [revert] the change to flist.c that
>> I had mentioned earlier? (In that case I would try to have the Debian
>> maintainer revert the 2.6.1 style patch relative to the
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 02:40:07PM +0400, Denis Lagno wrote:
> rsync --delete -anvc /dir1 /dir2
>
> It is natural to expect to see printed out all files that would be
> updated including files that would be deleted. But such invocation
> do not print files that would be deleted.
I can't reproduc
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 08:34:55AM +0200, Kurt Hornik wrote:
> Just checking: in essence you will [revert] the change to flist.c that
> I had mentioned earlier? (In that case I would try to have the Debian
> maintainer revert the 2.6.1 style patch relative to the 2.6.0 upstream
> as well ...)
No,
25 matches
Mail list logo
