On 18 Apr 2002, David Bolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few caveats - both ends have to support the option - I couldn't make
> it backwards compatible because both ends exchange information about a
> sorted file list that has to sort the same way on either side (which
> very subtly bit me when
On 16 Apr 2002, Alberto Accomazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what I meant to say is that while your example works, the following doesn't:
>
> $ rsync foo rsync://localhost/transfer/
>
> you say they do but then use the :: syntax for uploads.
You're quite right. We should fix that.
Hi folks,
First time mailer and newby to rsync. I have rsync v2.4.3 and am getting
the following error:
receiving file list ... ld.so.1: /net/lego/x/vp2/rsync/bin/rsync: fatal:
relocation error: file /net/lego/x/vp2/rsync/bin/rsync: symbol stat64:
referenced symbol not foundoverflow: flags=0x4
I am using 2.4.6 on both ends (chosen by FreeBSD 4.4 ports collection), so I
believe your patch should work. Thanks.
Peter
--
Peter R. Tattam[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Managing Director,Trumpet Software International Pty Ltd
Hobart, Australia, Ph. +61-3-6245-0220, Fax +
Peter Tattam [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
> I believe a suitable workaround would be to ignore case for file names
> when the rsync process is undertaken. Is this facility available or
> planned in the near future?
I've attached a context diff for some changes I made to our local copy
a while ba
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 07:23:38PM -0700, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 18 Apr 2002, Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since I uses rsync in a perl script I'd rather prefer to get error codes from
> > rsync instead of messages at STDOUT. Is there an option which tells rsync it
> > should return e
On 18 Apr 2002, Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since I uses rsync in a perl script I'd rather prefer to get error codes from
> rsync instead of messages at STDOUT. Is there an option which tells rsync it
> should return error codes?
You ought to get an exit code which indicates what happe
I am having trouble with rsync when I am trying to synchronize a Windows NT
volume mounted with smb_fs (FreeBSD) and a unix volume which is also exported
with Samba.
There are instances where the DOS short name on the NT volume ends up as upper
case and then doesn't match filenames which are used
Since I uses rsync in a perl script I'd rather prefer to get error codes from
rsync instead of messages at STDOUT. Is there an option which tells rsync it
should return error codes?
Is this possible or do I ask something ridiculous? How is the error handling
done when rsync can't download a file?
I upgraded rsync from 2.3.1 to 2.5.5, and now one of my nightly
jobs fails with
building file list ... done
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (11980581 bytes read so far)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(150)
rsync: connection unexpectedly cl
Hello,
I am seeing the following rsync error in my messages log (linux server,
kernel 2.4.5)
Apr 15 02:05:00 pinga rsyncd[31544]: rsync on virtual from xxx.x.com
(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx)
Apr 15 02:05:00 pinga rsyncd[31544]: wrote 54259 bytes read 200 bytes
total size 38886836
Apr 15 02:05:00 pinga r
On 18 Apr 2002, btober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, when thealgorithm thinks that a block of code in the source file A
Please read the thesis chapter again. You're neglecting the fact
previously explained to you that rsync also does an MD4 across
the whole file as a consistency check.
> the
Oh. Now i feel like an *enlightened* idiot. I 've always thought of a
checksum, crc, or whatever as giving 1/2^^length certainty, and I have a
sense that that knowing the file length adds another amount of certainty,
though I can't quantify that. I just know that if the size doesn't match,
Okay, here is the problem as I see it:
The algorithm is deterministic - know exactly what it will do next and what conditions
are present at any given point in time.
The overall result is not. It is probabilitic, and the probalilities are 1:2^128 or
something of that order, but still, there is
> And don't ask me to produce an example, because I do understand
> "astronomical". But if you had a heart pacemaker whose operation
> depended on appropriate updates to a control data file, would you trust
> rsync to send that file update to the pacemaker?
0_0" <= REALLY astonished face
Do you
So, when thealgorithm thinks that a block of code in the source file A
is the same as some block of code in target file file B, on account of
the check-sums being the same, when in fact the two blocks of code are
different (as the documentation explicitely states is an, al beit
remote, possibility
any other alternative ? instead of pubkey. i can't distrubute the pubkey to my
client.
i try this in my LAN, it's work without ask me for the passwd. but failed for 2
remote server which are behind firewall. isn't it for the auto password
(--password-file=rsync.pwd) authetication have to go thru
17 matches
Mail list logo
