Re: Error when compile rsync

Hi Albert, Thanks for the help. I did compile rsync2.5.2 with 64 bit, just want to confirm if I got it right. When I ran rsync --version, I got: % ./rsync --version rsync version 2.5.2 protocol version 26 Copyright (C) 1996-2002 by Andrew Tridgell and others Capa

error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at token.c(288)

I am getting the following error when mirroring part of the RedHat distribution tree over a slow connection (~T1 speed). When running over a faster network (100BaseT) the problem does not appear. Note, the problem file a large 600MB ISO image, whereas other small files appear to be fine. rsync: o

Re: Fix for batch mode (was Re: batch mode maintainability)

Thanks to Alberto Accomazzi and Dave Dykstra for their comments. Please have a look at the updated version below. On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 11:28:46AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote: > Refer people to the BATCH MODE section for more details. Done. > The opening description should be easily understanda

Fw: [siback-list] latest rsync 2.5.2

> > - Original Message - > From: "James Finnall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "listasiback" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:18 AM > Subject: [siback-list] latest rsync 2.5.2 > > > > Hello everybody, > > > > With the recent security announcement regarding rsync, I th

Fw: [siback-list] latest rsync 2.5.2

- Original Message - From: "James Finnall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "listasiback" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:18 AM Subject: [siback-list] latest rsync 2.5.2 > Hello everybody, > > With the recent security announcement regarding rsync, I thought > this would be

Re: Moving files revisited

On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote: > Ouch, is that another byte for every file? Are there no bits free in > the "flags" field already in file_struct? Yes, it is an extra byte per file. An earlier patch of mine did use bits in the existing flag word in the current per-file structure, but s

Re: Moving files revisited

On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote: > It's up to Martin to decide, but I'm sorry to tell you that I'm opposed to > a --move-files option. I think that if somebody wants to do that they > should do it with an external program after rsync returns a clean exit > code. It seems to me that it go

Java client and rsync

Are there any available java classes that can use rsync for file transfer. If so do they support connecting to an rsync-server. Any reasons to or not to do this from within java would also be appreciated.   _Brian    

Re: Files getting excluded.. don't understand why?

On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 12:47:41AM -0600, Dustin Puryear wrote: > I am trying to use rsync along with find to quickly copy changes to mirrors > for some web sites. The basic idea is: > > 1 look for files newer than X >> export-file > 2 rsync --include-from=export-file remote-server:/remote-path

Re: Fix for batch mode (was Re: batch mode maintainability)

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 05:53:04PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 06:19:56PM -0801, Jos Backus wrote: > > OK, I may need help with the markup part though, so I'll post a rough draft > > here first. > > Here's my first attempt at improving the documentation of the batch mode >

Re: configure --with-rsh=CMD and default blocking-IO support

I see that Martin agreed to put it in: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2001-July/004554.html but it must have dropped off his priority list. - Dave Dykstra On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 11:11:50AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: > A while back I argued for adding a --with-rsh=CMD option to co

Re: Moving files revisited

On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 10:42:06AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote: > It's up to Martin to decide, but I'm sorry to tell you that I'm opposed to > a --move-files option. I think that if somebody wants to do that they > should do it with an external program after rsync returns a clean exit > code. It s

Re: Moving files revisited

It's up to Martin to decide, but I'm sorry to tell you that I'm opposed to a --move-files option. I think that if somebody wants to do that they should do it with an external program after rsync returns a clean exit code. It seems to me that it goes against the purpose of rsync because after the

Re: Wierd problem with rysnc.

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 03:32:13PM -0800, Sri Ramkrishna wrote: > Hi Dave, > > I have tried for some days to re-produce this, but was not able to. > However, I believe we may have found the cause of the problem. Let me > ask you something. > > If you have something like this: > > a/ > > in t

int64 problem on debian potato

Hi, This is probably old news, but when I tried to compile rsync 2.5.2 on an ordinary debian potato (i386), it failed. Turns out that int64 was defined as unsigned off64_t, but seemingly off64_t was defined as some sort of struct. My solution was to do GCC=gcc "-D _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64" ./confi

Re: rsync Warning: unexpected read size of 0 in map_ptr

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 06:03:10PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Dave Dykstra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > I stumbled across the bug report > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58878 > > > > which shows that you made a bug fix to rsync on Sunday. What exactly did > > y

Re: Cygwin, Rsync, and Raid5

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 01:45:16PM -0800, James Couzens wrote: > Hello all! > > I've got CGYWIN running on an NT4 server, which in turn allows me to run > Rsync as a daemon on this system. And might I say, it works most > excellently, except for one flaw. It doesn't work on my raid drive(s). I