David Chelimsky wrote:
> Consise? Yes. But I'm not psyched about 'specify' either. There IS a
> perfect word for this situation. What is it? Suggestions?
Personally, I disagree. For examples like that, I think 'specify' is a
pretty ideal word. It reads exactly as I want it to. Depending on what
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know if there's a vim plugin out there that will show a tree of
> your describe/it blocks at a glance. Preferably with click ability to go
> right to that location?
It'd be awesome to have a ctags-esque feature for vie
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Rupert Voelcker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had a quick look at the rake tasks for rspec and cucumber (and
> rcov), but not having payed with rake very much I can't at the moment
> get my head around what I need to do so am hoping for some
> guidance
>
> W
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:40 PM, lawrence.pit wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I took a stab at this and created what I call Machinery. So far it
> works great for me.
>
> For those that are looking for a way to create objects in the database
> in a before(:all) instead of a before(:each) to speed up tests, have a
Scott Taylor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering about this: I've been dealing with classes/modules
> nested in several layers of namespaces. Here would be an example of
> a describe block:
>
> describe ClassOne::ClassTwo::ClassThree, "description here" do
> ...
> end
>
> What would be the
Daniel N wrote:
> On 7/25/07, Mikel Lindsaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> There would be a different way.
>>
>> In the idea of "Only test the code you write" all you really need to
>> spec is that you have set the right association, because activerecord
>> has it's own tests to ensure the uniq
Russell Tracey wrote:
> It's my understanding that model specs (and specs in general) should
> be shielded from the implementation details, so how do i check that
> Project.active_projects only returns active projects without looking
> at assuming something about the implementation? My initial thou
On Nov 12, 2007 11:39 AM, Brian Takita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here are the main reasons that I prefer an active voice because:
> * using it "should ..." over and over renders should meaningless (I
> have grown this barely conscience aversion to the word 'should')
> * less less words are neede
On Nov 14, 2007 12:32 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://rspec.rubyforge.org/documentation/rails/install.html
>
> CURRENT means the latest release, not the trunk. 1.0.8 was out months
> ago - obviously not compatible with subsequent changes to rails.
>
> Cheers,
> David
I see
On Nov 23, 2007 3:48 PM, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, I've seen the following fail:
>
> module Admin
>describe MyController
>...
>end
> end
>
> But this works fine:
>
> describe Admin::MyController
>..
> end
How has the top one failed? I use it excl
On Nov 23, 2007 11:53 PM, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got an "unknown action foo" error message (wasn't getting it before
> today - running on trunk).
>
>
> Scott
Can you reproduce it reliably?
I had an Admin::SomeController controller, and the specs were passing
fine. I went to a
On Nov 25, 2007 9:23 AM, Kyle Hargraves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2007 11:53 PM, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I got an "unknown action foo" error message (wasn't getting it before
> > today - running on trunk).
> >
> &
I recently noticed the HTML formatter for the story runner, but I'm
unable to figure out how to make it function.
'ruby stories/all.rb --format html' seems like it should work, in that
--help works as expected, but I still get only plain text output.
Maybe it's not been wired up yet and/or this i
On Dec 12, 2007 4:37 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2007 5:03 AM, Thijs Cadier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Has anybody been taking a look at this issue? I'm getting a little annoyed
> > touching the namespaced controllers before running the specs all the time
> >
On Dec 12, 2007 5:03 AM, Thijs Cadier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Has anybody been taking a look at this issue? I'm getting a little annoyed
> touching the namespaced controllers before running the specs all the time
> :-).
As a workaround, do what the rest of us have done and just be explicit
On Dec 12, 2007 9:09 PM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a model Message, which needs to send an email using action
> mailer after it's first saved in the database.
>
> I want to pass the model to the mailer which then uses methods on the
> message model to render the email.
>
>
On Dec 14, 2007 6:52 AM, Erik Terpstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody have a vim script that enables me to run specs from within
> vim and have the cursor positioned on the right line in case of a backtrace?
>
> TIA,
>
> Erik.
Having finally gone back to vim from textmate (after
On Dec 19, 2007 7:01 PM, James Deville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the status on a rake task for the story runner. If nothing is
> in progress, where could I start to try and build one?
>
> JD
I've been using:
task 'stories' do
sh "ruby stories/all.rb"
end
task 'stories:rcov' do
sh "
The REV constants no longer exist in trunk (and haven't for a while),
yet somehow your rspec_on_rails in vendor is still expecting it.
Meaning you don't actually have a copy of trunk in
plugins/rspec_on_rails, I guess.
HTH
Kyle
On 12/28/07, s.ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm moving an older
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm getting some weird behavior. I'm currently running on trunk rspec/
> rails, with 3.9.1 autotest. If a all tests succeed or are pending,
> autotest just sits there dutifully with the blinking cursor. If an
> example fails, it
Thank you much.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:07 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The source of the bug was a patch that we applied a while back. This
> was after the 1.1.3 release, so if you're using 1.1.3 you're fine. If
> you're using trunk, go ahead and update and you should be
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Ashley Moran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17/03/2008, Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Has anyone managed this?
> >
>
> Cracked it. Really ugly, but my stories/helper.rb looks like this
>
> ENV["RAILS_ENV"] = "test_integration"
> require File.exp
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Ashley Moran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17/03/2008, Kyle Hargraves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We discussed this in a ticket on lighthouse, and I ended up writing a
> > workalike that's sitting atop hpricot. It'
Hello everyone,
A few weeks ago, I put together a little project that provides a
have_tag() matcher look-alike that can be used outside of Rails
projects, backed by Hpricot, which I very creatively named
rspec_hpricot_matchers. It's not a drop-in replacement for
rspec_on_rails' have_tag(): no subs
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Tim Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi'ya
>
> I have a When step that calls get game_url. It turns out that calling this
> page is resulting in a render error, which explains my failing Then steps.
> It would help me if the story told me there was a problem rend
Hullo all,
It sucks to write wrapper .rb files just so stories/all.rb can find
and run them.
So I am trawling for feedback on a small project I pushed to github a
day or two ago; it provides a 'story' executable that can be used to
run your plain text stories from the command line, akin to the 's
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Joe Van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Kyle Hargraves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hullo all,
> >
> > It sucks to write wrapper .rb files just so stories/all.rb can find
> > and run t
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Kamal Fariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Kyle,
>
> I tried the story runner against a story. Unfortunately, it had
> problems executing webrat methods like 'visits'.
>
> Kindly check out this pastie: http://pastie.org/175204
>
> I tried running it with the nor
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Ashley Moran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11 Apr 2008, at 05:16, Zach Dennis wrote:
>
> > - stories/
> > - projects/
> > - a_user_creating_a_project_story
> > - a_project_manager_adding_users_to_a_project_story
> > - admin/
> >
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Steve Downey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there more precision than seconds in a Time instance?
>
> irb(main):006:0> a,b = Time.now, Time.now
> => [Sat May 03 11:06:31 -0700 2008, Sat May 03 11:06:31 -0700 2008]
> irb(main):007:0> puts a.to_i, b.to_i
> 1209837991
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Ben Mabey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm curious what everyone else on this list has been doing in this regard.
> Are you writing declarative scenarios all the time? Or are you reusing a
> lot of your steps with detailed scenarios? A little bit of both maybe?
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 6:59 PM, T K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a spec
>
> it "should have a unique username "
>
> I have a code:
>
> validates_uniqueness_of :user_name
>
>
> Now, I don't know how to test this code. In order to test this, do I
> need to run `save`?
>
> For exampl
I'm looking to drive the development of a rails app that does nothing
but serve a JSON API. All of the models are well tested elsewhere, so
I needn't worry about that. My only immediate goal is to be able to
fire off requests to a path and check the returned JSON.
I've tried a number of methods fo
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:16 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I started with user stories, but the conversion to english was
>> difficult for something largely developer-facing. "When I get
>> /widgets/:id" where :id is actually determined behind the scenes did
>> not read well, and
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 5:03 AM, Mikel Lindsaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find myself doing this:
>
> Scenario "logged in user visiting the home page" do
> Given "A logged in user" do
>a_logged_in_user
> end
>
> When "..."
> Then "..."
> end
>
> The a_logged_in_user method is a helper
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Jim Lindley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I just got back from RailsConf, and upgraded on of my development apps to
>>> 2.1, and now autotest is going into an infinite loop. It runs tests
>>> continuously instead of waiting for files to be saved before rerunning.
>
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Christopher Bailey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Specifically, I'm wondering, or contemplating, if I do unit tests for
> my models, and then I use WebRat plus RailsStory, do I even need to
> then do functional testing of my controllers and views? I can see
> that I
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Lori M Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you have an example of such an exception to share?
>
> Thanks, Lori
The .autotest at the base of one of my plugins, which updates a .sqlite3:
Autotest.add_hook :initialize do |at|
at.add_exception('spec/db/tracks_
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Christopher Bailey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kyle, thanks much for sharing your experience. You mention the speed
> and so on. I've read that it is slow. Question: does Autotest work
> the same way with stories, or have a way to detect what file(s)
> changed
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Britt Mileshosky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello, I'm wondering If I am missing something here when creating an example
> that sets an expecation at the top or beginning of an action but requires you
> to stub / mock everything that follows.
>
> Example:
> I
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Cohen, Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Consider:
> should_have_the_same_members_as
Similarly, I have a have_same_elements_as(arr) matcher.
k
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.or
41 matches
Mail list logo
