On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 17/03/2008, Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has anyone managed this? > > > > Cracked it. Really ugly, but my stories/helper.rb looks like this > > ENV["RAILS_ENV"] = "test_integration" > require File.expand_path(File.dirname(__FILE__) + > "/../config/environment") > # We don't want to use the story adapter because it interferes > # starts creating transactions that stop multi-process testing (ie > # story runner and mongrel) seeing each other's data > #require 'spec/rails/story_adapter' > > # ... > > # Hack to let us use should have_tag without loading rspec_on_rails > module ActionController > class TestResponse > > end > end > > include Test::Unit::Assertions > > require 'action_controller/assertions' > include ActionController::Assertions > > require 'spec/rails/matchers/assert_select' > include Spec::Rails::Matchers > > It's just waiting to break, I know it. > > Actually having done this and discussed assert_select with my team, I think > I'll write a have_tag matcher using Hpricot. That way I'm not putting the > quality of our application in the hands of Rails code. > > I thought I'd post this anyway for reference. > > Ashley
We discussed this in a ticket on lighthouse, and I ended up writing a workalike that's sitting atop hpricot. It's not quite identical, but generally close enough and so far does everything I've needed: http://github.com/pd/rspec_hpricot_matchers Patches and/or suggestions welcome if you need anything else out of it Kyle _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
