On Nov 14, 2007 5:50 PM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2007 4:00 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 13, 2007 5:17 PM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Let's say in some banking software we have a transfer screen, and
> > > there are three possi
Hey Mathijs,
Someone pinged me that you were interested in BDD with RubyCocoa (RC),
so I thought I'd just chip in.
I write my RC apps in a BDD way and as such support for it is included
with Rucola.
When we release 0.0.2 I will also release a screencast on how I use
BDD with RC.
But the bott
On Nov 18, 2007 6:36 AM, Eloy Duran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Atm I don't use rSpec but rather test/spec.
> So there are probably some hurdles to overcome if you really wish to
> use rSpec.
What hurdles would you anticipate?
___
rspec-users mailing li
On Nov 15, 2007 1:00 PM, Ed Howland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007 12:30 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ENV["RAILS_ENV"] = "test"
> > > require File.expand_path(File.dirname(__FILE__) +
> > > "/../config/environment")
> > > require 'spec/rails/story_adapter'
> >
On Nov 15, 2007 3:59 AM, Ingo Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to use the 'lazy' style of url generation in my views,
> omitting parameters from my calls to url_for (and named route
> methods) that are then filled in from the current request parameters.
>
> Example:
> url_for
Hi all,
As an experiment in playing nice with others, we've added the ability
in rspec's trunk to do this:
class ThingExamples < Spec::ExampleGroup
def should_do_stuff
...
end
end
This is how rspec 0.1 worked, and for people already comfortable with
the classes/methods approach of Test
On Nov 18, 2007 4:59 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As an experiment in playing nice with others, we've added the ability
> in rspec's trunk to do this:
>
> class ThingExamples < Spec::ExampleGroup
>
> def should_do_stuff
> ...
> end
>
> end
>
> This is how rsp
+1 for keeping should prefix given the number of people who write helper
methods starting with "should" (at last count, one person) versus the number
of people who find it useful starting test methods with the word "should" in
xunit testing frameworks (nearly everyone I know). Obviously my world is
On Nov 18, 2007 9:45 AM, Chris McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 18 Nov 2007, at 14:56, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> > On Nov 18, 2007 6:36 AM, Eloy Duran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Atm I don't use rSpec but rather test/spec.
> >> So there are probably some hurdles to overcome if you r
personally I find this to be one of the most frustrating things about
rspec, well, rspec's stubs
and wish the error messages could be much more helpful,
rather than just telling that an expected method was not called, tell
me if/when it was called with some other args instead
(if this causes ex
On 18 Nov 2007, at 14:56, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 6:36 AM, Eloy Duran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Atm I don't use rSpec but rather test/spec.
>> So there are probably some hurdles to overcome if you really wish to
>> use rSpec.
>
> What hurdles would you anticipate?
I don't th
On Nov 18, 2007 10:10 AM, Jonathan Linowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> personally I find this to be one of the most frustrating things about
> rspec, well, rspec's stubs
> and wish the error messages could be much more helpful,
> rather than just telling that an expected method was not called, tel
0
Should be able to turn on or off. don't know if the first went through.
Nathan Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec edge revision 2894
rspec_on_rails edge revision 2894
rails edge revision 8146
On Nov 18, 2007, at 9:59 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As an experiment in playing nice wi
0
Keep it, but make it a configuration option with default-off.
Nathan Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec edge revision 2894
rspec_on_rails edge revision 2894
rails edge revision 8146
On Nov 18, 2007, at 9:59 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As an experiment in playing nice with others,
On Nov 18, 2007 10:29 AM, aslak hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 4:59 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As an experiment in playing nice with others, we've added the ability
> > in rspec's trunk to do this:
> >
> > class ThingExamples < Spec::Ex
On Nov 18, 2007 11:15 AM, Jonathan Linowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OT I am so frustrated with Rubyforge. It refuses to let me log in. I
> know I have an account as I can change my password, and go through
> the login form, but it just returns with no cookie and not logged in
> and no messages.
OT I am so frustrated with Rubyforge. It refuses to let me log in. I
know I have an account as I can change my password, and go through
the login form, but it just returns with no cookie and not logged in
and no messages. Although I'm behind a proxy I do not have any
similar problems with a
On 19/11/2007, at 5:05 AM, Nathan Sutton wrote:
> 0
>
> Keep it, but make it a configuration option with default-off.
>
> Nathan Sutton
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> rspec edge revision 2894
> rspec_on_rails edge revision 2894
> rails edge revision 8146
>
>
I agree. +1 configuration with default being
Yes sorry I meant that rucola isn't fine tuned for rspec yet. :)
But apperantly Chris is going to work on this.
Eloy
On 18-nov-2007, at 16:45, Chris McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 18 Nov 2007, at 14:56, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
>> On Nov 18, 2007 6:36 AM, Eloy Duran <[EMAIL PROTECTED
El 18/11/2007, a las 0:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
> Probably not. There was a longer discussion of it here:
> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=13837&group_id=797&atid=3152
>
> As you point out, creating an alias is a one-liner.
> The main reason I don't want to add it is
On 18/11/2007, at 1:01 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> We're still writing Ruby here, aren't we!!!
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
>
Wanted to share my initial reaction to your Ruby statement.
Are we writing Ruby here? Or are we writing specifications? Are we
not using the power of the Ruby language to
# for readability
alias :running :lambda
Q.E.D.
On Nov 18, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Shane Mingins wrote:
>
> On 18/11/2007, at 1:01 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>> We're still writing Ruby here, aren't we!!!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David
>>
>>
>
>
> Wanted to share my initial reaction to your Ruby statement.
>
Hey all,
I'm very happy to announce that ActiveReload[1] has generously offered
to sponsor a lighthouse[2] account for rspec. We'll be moving ticket
tracking there. We've already got the account set up and will soon
make it public.
We're also going to be getting a sponsored slice at Engine Yard[3
Hi everybody.
Per http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/2007-November/004572.html,
we're going to be moving ticket tracking over to lighthouse. We'd like
to get this rolling sooner than later, but we're fairly well occupied
getting ready for the 1.1 release and writing rspec books :)
We've g
On Nov 18, 2007, at 4:10 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm very happy to announce that ActiveReload[1] has generously offered
> to sponsor a lighthouse[2] account for rspec. We'll be moving ticket
> tracking there. We've already got the account set up and will soon
> make it public.
>
David,
If no one else offers a more efficient solution, I'm willing to
manually copy the open tickets. (I count 37 of them)
I have read access to Rubyforge
and see this as an opportunity to get familiar with lighthouse
Jonathan
On Nov 18, 2007, at 4:16 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> Hi everybo
On Nov 18, 2007 4:16 PM, Jonathan Linowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David,
>
> If no one else offers a more efficient solution, I'm willing to
> manually copy the open tickets. (I count 37 of them)
> I have read access to Rubyforge
> and see this as an opportunity to get familiar with lighthouse
On Nov 18, 2007 3:16 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody.
>
> Per http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/2007-November/004572.html,
> we're going to be moving ticket tracking over to lighthouse. We'd like
> to get this rolling sooner than later, but we're fairly well o
If you want help moving them over give me a shout.
On Nov 18, 2007 5:34 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 3:16 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi everybody.
> >
> > Per http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/2007-November/004572.html
> ,
> > w
On Nov 19, 2007 8:24 AM, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 18, 2007, at 4:10 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I'm very happy to announce that ActiveReload[1] has generously offered
> > to sponsor a lighthouse[2] account for rspec. We'll be moving ticket
> > tracki
On Nov 18, 2007 6:17 PM, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please use Git. I've just got to know it ;)
>
Please use Mercurial. I've just got to know it. ;)
(Actually, I don't much mind; I have Mercurial installed, but I don't have
to interact with rspec source control often enough to min
I don't intend to use RSpec source either, but I suspect the most
people would be satisfied with a main Subversion repository. Git users
can check out from / in to a Subversion repository just fine.
On Nov 18, 2007 4:28 PM, Geoffrey Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 6:17 PM, Dan
On Nov 18, 2007 9:57 PM, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't intend to use RSpec source either, but I suspect the most
> people would be satisfied with a main Subversion repository. Git users
> can check out from / in to a Subversion repository just fine.
>
That poses a problem for
On 11/18/07, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 9:57 PM, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't intend to use RSpec source either, but I suspect the most
> > people would be satisfied with a main Subversion repository. Git users
> > can check out from / in to a
I can't get my plain text stories to show pending actions like the
example addition plain text story. Any tips? (See below)
http://pastie.caboo.se/119627
Nathan Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec edge revision 2910
rspec_on_rails edge revision 2909
rails edge revision 8167
_
-1
I, as a new rspec user, did not find the switch between test_ and it
"blah" do to be even a small challenge compared to other things I had
to convert and learn. I only feel like it would be one more thing to
keep up with that would cause problems. I can certainly see someone
writing a
David,
The move should be complete now.
-Chad
On Nov 18, 2007, at 5:26 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 4:16 PM, Jonathan Linowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> David,
>>
>> If no one else offers a more efficient solution, I'm willing to
>> manually copy the open tickets. (I coun
37 matches
Mail list logo
