# for readability alias :running :lambda Q.E.D.
On Nov 18, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Shane Mingins wrote: > > On 18/11/2007, at 1:01 PM, David Chelimsky wrote: >> We're still writing Ruby here, aren't we!!! >> >> Cheers, >> David >> >> > > > Wanted to share my initial reaction to your Ruby statement. > > Are we writing Ruby here? Or are we writing specifications? Are we > not using the power of the Ruby language to construct a DSL that > allows us to construct specifications about the behaviour of our code? > > Wouldn't the ideal be that I could create Behaviour specifications > using RSpec or JSpec or CSpec (or whatever) using language that is > natural to writing specifications? So something like lambda ... > which is a word I always have trouble typing ;-) ... would not seem > natural to the domain of BDD? > > These were just my initial thoughts :-) > > On the actual implementation side ... if I really wanted doing in my > specs I would add the one line and not really care too much that this > is what I need to do. > > Cheers > Shane > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
