On Sep 9, 11:16 pm, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "aslak hellesoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:16 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Aslak - I think Matt is looking for this:
>
> >> Given /blah/ do
> >> pending
> >> end
>
> > I'm not crazy
"aslak hellesoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:16 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Aslak - I think Matt is looking for this:
>>
>> Given /blah/ do
>> pending
>> end
>>
>
> I'm not crazy about this "feature". We already have a pending
> mechanism for steps
On 9 Sep 2008, at 21:34, aslak hellesoy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:46 PM, David Chelimsky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:47 PM, aslak hellesoy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:16 PM, David Chelimsky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aslak - I think Mat
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:46 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:47 PM, aslak hellesoy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:16 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Aslak - I think Matt is looking for this:
>>>
>>> Given /blah/
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:47 PM, aslak hellesoy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:16 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Aslak - I think Matt is looking for this:
>>
>> Given /blah/ do
>> pending
>> end
>>
>
> I'm not crazy about this "feature". We already have a
It's by design, but I'm open for suggestions. David created a similar
ticket yesterday:
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211/tickets/8-all-steps-
after-a-failure-are-listed-as-skipped#ticket-8-1
Currently, only a failure (red) will cause subsequent steps to be
skipped.
In case I've
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Matt Wynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah the trouble is it fails with the following error:
>
> Spec::Example::ExamplePendingError
>
> Which cucumber doesn't understand as anything other than a complete fail.
>
> Our workaround we've arrived at (thanks Aslak for p
Yeah the trouble is it fails with the following error:
Spec::Example::ExamplePendingError
Which cucumber doesn't understand as anything other than a complete
fail.
Our workaround we've arrived at (thanks Aslak for pointing out the
obvious that we'd missed!) is to just write PENDING at the
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:16 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aslak - I think Matt is looking for this:
>
> Given /blah/ do
> pending
> end
>
I'm not crazy about this "feature". We already have a pending
mechanism for steps (not defining them). What does this bring to the
table ove
Aslak - I think Matt is looking for this:
Given /blah/ do
pending
end
Matt - I'm pretty sure that will work - give it a shot, OK?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Aslak Hellesøy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A plain text step with no matching step definition is pending.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
A plain text step with no matching step definition is pending.
Sent from my iPhone
On 9. sep.. 2008, at 19.05, "David Chelimsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Have you tried?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Matt Wynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I love the way I can throw a call to pending(
Have you tried?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Matt Wynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I love the way I can throw a call to pending() in the top of an unfinished
> RSpec example and stop it from failing the build.
> Is there a similar way to do such a thing with good ole' cucumber?
>
> cheers,
>
I love the way I can throw a call to pending() in the top of an
unfinished RSpec example and stop it from failing the build.
Is there a similar way to do such a thing with good ole' cucumber?
cheers,
Matt
http://blog.mattwynne.net
http://songkick.com
In case you wondered: The opinions ex
13 matches
Mail list logo