On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Matt Wynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah the trouble is it fails with the following error: > > Spec::Example::ExamplePendingError > > Which cucumber doesn't understand as anything other than a complete fail. > > Our workaround we've arrived at (thanks Aslak for pointing out the obvious > that we'd missed!) is to just write PENDING at the end of the regex for the > step matcher so it doesn't match on the step in the feature file. > > @Aslak - Interestingly, when we do this and make the Given step pending, cuc > still tries to run the When / Then steps for that scenario. Sounds like a > bug to me - should we raise a ticket on lighthouse or did I miss something? >
It's by design, but I'm open for suggestions. David created a similar ticket yesterday: http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211/tickets/8-all-steps-after-a-failure-are-listed-as-skipped#ticket-8-1 Currently, only a failure (red) will cause subsequent steps to be skipped. Aslak > > On 9 Sep 2008, at 18:16, David Chelimsky wrote: > >> Aslak - I think Matt is looking for this: >> >> Given /blah/ do >> pending >> end >> >> Matt - I'm pretty sure that will work - give it a shot, OK? >> >> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Aslak Hellesøy >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> A plain text step with no matching step definition is pending. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 9. sep.. 2008, at 19.05, "David Chelimsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Have you tried? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Matt Wynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I love the way I can throw a call to pending() in the top of an >>>>> unfinished >>>>> RSpec example and stop it from failing the build. >>>>> Is there a similar way to do such a thing with good ole' cucumber? >>>>> >>>>> cheers, >>>>> Matt >>>>> ---- >>>>> http://blog.mattwynne.net >>>>> http://songkick.com >>>>> In case you wondered: The opinions expressed in this email are my own >>>>> and >>>>> do >>>>> not necessarily reflect the views of any former, current or future >>>>> employers >>>>> of mine. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> rspec-users mailing list >>>>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >>>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rspec-users mailing list >>>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rspec-users mailing list >>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > cheers, > Matt > ---- > http://blog.mattwynne.net > http://songkick.com > > In case you wondered: The opinions expressed in this email are my own and do > not necessarily reflect the views of any former, current or future employers > of mine. > > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
