Hi All,
I'm looking for a cucumber (browser) client where the product owner can
browse/edit features and see the status of the features. So far I tried the
rcumber plugin (found here
http://wiki.github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/related-tools) which more or
less does what I want but still in a ve
Correct me if I'm wrong (and I probably missed something), but why do
you and some others in this thread want users to actually edit a
feature?
That's going to wreck havoc with steps that won't match anymore,
breaking features, and therefore making the client angry.
WDYT?
bartz
> My thinking
Also, if people are into this sort of thing, I would be up for helping build
it.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Mischa Fierer wrote:
> A few other things...
>
> In the interface that I was describing, it would solve several problems to
> have something like:
>
> Given I'm a client
> When I fol
A few other things...
In the interface that I was describing, it would solve several problems to
have something like:
Given I'm a client
When I follow "new story"
And I drag in "Given I am a Pet Owner"
And I press "new action"
And I select "When I follow"
And I fill in "follows_what_link" with "B
I can maybe offer something here. *begin rambling*
My team of 4 (2 coders, 2 biz people) has recently switched to using Pivotal
Tracker, and we've been doing the following:
1) Figure out what we can do that will add value
2) Draw out the ui / changes on a whiteboard
3) Write out features & copy t
On 16-dec-2008, at 9:42, Matt Wynne wrote:
On 15 Dec 2008, at 12:53, Bart Zonneveld wrote:
On 14-dec-2008, at 19:49, mike.gaffney wrote:
Why not make a web client that manipulates git based projects in
the background? I've been messing around with Grit and doing
things like this lately
On 15 Dec 2008, at 12:53, Bart Zonneveld wrote:
On 14-dec-2008, at 19:49, mike.gaffney wrote:
Why not make a web client that manipulates git based projects in
the background? I've been messing around with Grit and doing things
like this lately for http://rdocul.us a site I run and it is v
On 14-dec-2008, at 19:49, mike.gaffney wrote:
Why not make a web client that manipulates git based projects in
the background? I've been messing around with Grit and doing things
like this lately for http://rdocul.us a site I run and it is very
easy to do. If everything is in a standard lo
Why not make a web client that manipulates git based projects in the
background? I've been messing around with Grit and doing things like
this lately for http://rdocul.us a site I run and it is very easy to do.
If everything is in a standard location you could just add a project via
an administ
On 9 Dec 2008, at 09:43, aslak hellesoy wrote:
Hi folks,
Cucumber has become popular a lot quicker than I had anticipated.
Still, with its plain text nature it is still limited to programmers
(in most teams).
I want to close the gap between customers/product owners/business
analysts and
I think it would be a great app to have, which would work well
inside a web browser, rather than a fat client that customers and
managers have to download...?
+1, I think keeping it in the browser will work well for most
situations. One option is to make it a flex app and could then be
use
Matt Wynne wrote:
On 9 Dec 2008, at 15:11, aslak hellesoy wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:52 PM, steven shingler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hey Aslak,
Doesn't this sound a bit like your Kipling project, which we spoke
about at QCon London, back in March? ;)
(http://gitorious.org/projects/
steven shingler wrote:
Hey Aslak,
Doesn't this sound a bit like your Kipling project, which we spoke
about at QCon London, back in March? ;)
(http://gitorious.org/projects/kipling)
I think it would be a great app to have, which would work well inside
a web browser, rather than a fat client
On 9 Dec 2008, at 15:11, aslak hellesoy wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:52 PM, steven shingler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hey Aslak,
Doesn't this sound a bit like your Kipling project, which we spoke
about at QCon London, back in March? ;)
(http://gitorious.org/projects/kipling)
A littl
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:52 PM, steven shingler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Aslak,
>
> Doesn't this sound a bit like your Kipling project, which we spoke about at
> QCon London, back in March? ;)
>
> (http://gitorious.org/projects/kipling)
>
A little bit, but the idea with Kipling was to mak
Hey Aslak,
Doesn't this sound a bit like your Kipling project, which we spoke about at
QCon London, back in March? ;)
(http://gitorious.org/projects/kipling)
I think it would be a great app to have, which would work well inside a web
browser, rather than a fat client that customers and managers
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Rahoul Baruah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9 Dec 2008, at 09:43, aslak hellesoy wrote:
>
> So I'm asking you - what would this user interface be like? How do people
>> want to access it
>> and use it?
>>
>
>
> I was considering writing (but will probably neve
Hi Aslak,
Below are my manager's recommendations:
"If you take a look at Twist, Thoughtworks have already done the hard
work in gleaning the requirements for this. Something Twist like would
be well received.
http://studios.thoughtworks.com/twist-agile-test-automation
Their implementation is ec
On 9 Dec 2008, at 09:43, aslak hellesoy wrote:
So I'm asking you - what would this user interface be like? How do
people want to access it
and use it?
I was considering writing (but will probably never have time for) a
simple writeboard/wiki-style site that is linked to a git repository.
Hi folks,
Cucumber has become popular a lot quicker than I had anticipated.
Still, with its plain text nature it is still limited to programmers (in
most teams).
I want to close the gap between customers/product owners/business analysts
and programmers,
and I'm convinced that a fat client is need
20 matches
Mail list logo
