steven shingler wrote:
Hey Aslak,

Doesn't this sound a bit like your Kipling project, which we spoke about at QCon London, back in March? ;)

(http://gitorious.org/projects/kipling)

I think it would be a great app to have, which would work well inside a web browser, rather than a fat client that customers and managers have to download...?
+1, I think keeping it in the browser will work well for most situations. One option is to make it a flex app and could then be used as a stand-alone Air app. WDYT?

I have been thinking about the requirements for such a project and I think having it git-powered would be great. Having the stakeholder to be able to edit features and have the changes show up in a remote branch automatically would be a great feature IMO. If it is powered off of git we also get versioning and a lot of other stuff for free. (I would recommend watching Scott Chacoon's presentation on using git in this way from ruby conf: http://rubyconf2008.confreaks.com/using-git-in-ruby-applications.html)

Anyways, thats my two cents. I would argue that most business people these days are just as, if not more, comfortable in a browser than they are in Excel as long as the UI is good. Of course, having clients for both would be ideal. :)
-Ben

From my recollection, you were wanting to keep Kipling quite sparse and text based, in contrast to the Thoughtworks product which Aidy mentioned in this thread.

I would be interested in getting involved with this, if I could be helpful in any way :)

Steven


On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:15 AM, aslak hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:



    On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Rahoul Baruah
    <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:


        On 9 Dec 2008, at 09:43, aslak hellesoy wrote:

            So I'm asking you - what would this user interface be
            like? How do people want to access it
            and use it?



        I was considering writing (but will probably never have time
        for) a simple writeboard/wiki-style site that is linked to a
        git repository.

        So you point the app at a clone of your git repository's
        features folder, people can browse the folder, edit a feature
        in the browser (and view the history) and then push them
        straight back into the repo.

        (I noticed someone else had posted a writeboard-based system
        earlier too)


    Yes, it's called Remote Feature:
    http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/wikis/related-tools
    http://github.com/mhennemeyer/remote_feature/tree/master

    Aslak

        B

        Rahoul Baruah
        Web design and development: http://www.3hv.co.uk/
        Nottingham Forest: http://www.eighteensixtyfive.co.uk/
        Serious Rails Hosting: http://www.brightbox.co.uk/
        Lifecast: http://www.madeofstone.net/






        _______________________________________________
        rspec-users mailing list
        rspec-users@rubyforge.org <mailto:rspec-users@rubyforge.org>
        http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users



    _______________________________________________
    rspec-users mailing list
    rspec-users@rubyforge.org <mailto:rspec-users@rubyforge.org>
    http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to