On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2010, at 7:12 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Ashley Moran
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jan 18, 2010, at 9:31 am, Pat Maddox wrote:
>>>
define_simple_predicate_matcher :rise_from_the_ashes?
>>>
>>> As an
On Jan 18, 2010, at 7:12 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Ashley Moran
> wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 18, 2010, at 9:31 am, Pat Maddox wrote:
>>
>>> define_simple_predicate_matcher :rise_from_the_ashes?
>>
>> As an extension, how about:
>>
>> define_simple_predicate_matche
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:17 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Pat Maddox
> wrote:
>
...
> > class User < ActiveRecord::Base
> > named_scope :admins, :conditions => {:admin => true}
> > end
> >
> > describe User, "admins" do
> > it "should include users with admin
On Jan 18, 2010, at 3:12 pm, David Chelimsky wrote:
> I'd rather not add a new DSL for the few cases in which we want to
> essentially delegate a predicate. We can already do this with the
> matcher DSL:
I think Pat was just suggesting Roger try this in his own code. It's not
something I espec
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Phillip Koebbe wrote:
In cucumber, I use tags in a very simple, yet helpful (to me) way: to number
my scenarios. For example:
@1
Scenario: This is a scenario
@2
Scenario: This is another scenario
@3
Scenario: You get the idea
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Phillip Koebbe wrote:
> In cucumber, I use tags in a very simple, yet helpful (to me) way: to number
> my scenarios. For example:
>
> @1
>
> Scenario: This is a scenario
>
> @2
>
> Scenario: This is another scenario
>
> @3
>
> Scenario: You get the idea
>
> This al
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Ashley Moran
wrote:
>
> On Jan 18, 2010, at 9:31 am, Pat Maddox wrote:
>
>> define_simple_predicate_matcher :rise_from_the_ashes?
>
> As an extension, how about:
>
> define_simple_predicate_matcher :risen_from_the_ashes =>
> :rises_from_the_ashes?
I'd rather not
In cucumber, I use tags in a very simple, yet helpful (to me) way: to
number my scenarios. For example:
@1
Scenario: This is a scenario
@2
Scenario: This is another scenario
@3
Scenario: You get the idea
This allows me to focus in on a single scenario quite easily while I'm
working on it.
On Jan 18, 2010, at 9:31 am, Pat Maddox wrote:
> define_simple_predicate_matcher :rise_from_the_ashes?
As an extension, how about:
define_simple_predicate_matcher :risen_from_the_ashes => :rise_from_the_ashes?
Also, in general, I think specs look better without ? symbols on methods, my
prefer
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2010, at 6:17 PM, Nin wrote:
> > Hi! I'm new to rspec and was wondering how named_scopes are usually
> > tested? Is it enough to test that it's defined? or do you need to test
> > the behavior as well? I've been reading around and thi
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
named_scope :admins, :conditions => {:admin => true}
end
describe User, "admins" do
it "should include users with admin flag" do
admin = User.create! :admin => true
User.admin.should include(admin)
end
it "should not include users without admin flag
On Jan 15, 2010, at 6:19 AM, Ashley Moran wrote:
>
> On 14 Jan 2010, at 17:02, Rick DeNatale wrote:
>
>> -1
>>
>> You can already say
>>
>> a.should include("1:4")
>>
>> which is clearer IMHO.
>
>
> I assume Roger was referring to the general case though (which I still don't
> like) - and
12 matches
Mail list logo
