On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Ashley Moran
<ashley.mo...@patchspace.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On Jan 18, 2010, at 9:31 am, Pat Maddox wrote:
>
>> define_simple_predicate_matcher :rise_from_the_ashes?
>
> As an extension, how about:
>
> define_simple_predicate_matcher :risen_from_the_ashes =>
> :rises_from_the_ashes?
I'd rather not add a new DSL for the few cases in which we want to
essentially delegate a predicate. We can already do this with the
matcher DSL:
Spec::Matchers.define :risen_from_the_ashes do
match {|actual| actual.risen_from_the_ashes?}
end
This is better aligned w/ other matchers, more clear as to what it
does, and isn't much more code.
FWIW,
David
>
> Also, in general, I think specs look better without ? symbols on methods, my
> preference though
>
> Ashley
>
> --
> http://www.patchspace.co.uk/
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
