On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Donald French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been using ZenTest AutoTest with the previous version of rspec-rails.
> When I updated to 1.1.5 the autotest just hangs. Are these compatible?
Use either the installed autospec (not autotest) or script/autospec
comm
I have been using ZenTest AutoTest with the previous version of rspec-
rails. When I updated to 1.1.5 the autotest just hangs. Are these
compatible?
Don French
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listin
On 2008-09-29, at 19:33, Zach Dennis wrote:
Having chained_replace_html is a hack to separate the regular
expressions based on if you used Way #1 or Way #2.
Interesting. Thanks for that explanation.
I have stopped relying on using RJS selectors to test against
generated JavaScript. I have als
On 2008-09-29, at 13:19, Steve Schafer wrote:
I think it's a parsing problem, rather than an idiom problem. I
think he
read it as if "offhand" were the object of "that is offhand," which
doesn't make much sense.
Hah, you're right, Steve =)
___
rspe
On Sep 29, 2008, at 5:02 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Scott Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 29, 2008, at 4:36 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Scott Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 29, 2008, at 3:54 PM, David Chel
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Nick Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-09-28, at 17:20, Nick Hoffman wrote:
>>
>> 431 it 'should hide the map filter errors ' do
>> 432 do_xhr @xhr_params
>> 433 response.should have_rjs
>> 434 # response.should have_
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Scott Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 29, 2008, at 4:36 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Scott Taylor
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sep 29, 2008, at 3:54 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008
On Sep 29, 2008, at 4:36 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Scott Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 29, 2008, at 3:54 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Scott Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to write a spec asserting th
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Scott Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 29, 2008, at 3:54 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Scott Taylor
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm trying to write a spec asserting that no layout should be used in a
>>> contr
On Sep 29, 2008, at 3:54 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Scott Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to write a spec asserting that no layout should be used
in a
controller. My spec currently looks like this:
it "should render with no layout" do
c
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Scott Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to write a spec asserting that no layout should be used in a
> controller. My spec currently looks like this:
>
>it "should render with no layout" do
> controller.expect_render.with(hash_including(:lay
I'm trying to write a spec asserting that no layout should be used in
a controller. My spec currently looks like this:
it "should render with no layout" do
controller.expect_render.with(hash_including(:layout => nil))
do_action
end
And this code, which should pass the s
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:34:34 -0500, you wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Nick Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 2008-09-29, at 07:58, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>>
...
>>>
>>> I'm not sure why that is offhand, still waking up this fine Monday
>>> morning, but I'd recommend throwing th
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Nick Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-09-29, at 07:58, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Nick Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2008-09-28, at 17:20, Nick Hoffman wrote:
431 it 'should hide t
On 2008-09-29, at 07:58, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Nick Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 2008-09-28, at 17:20, Nick Hoffman wrote:
431 it 'should hide the map filter errors ' do
432 do_xhr @xhr_params
433 response.should have_rjs
2008-09-26 20:19, Jonathan Linowes:
> rake spec looks at the development environment to prepare the db
> schema, but still runs the specs in test
Looks like you're right. I haven't really had time to test this
though. I'll tell when I really know whats going on inside our app.
--
Tero Tilus ##
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Scott Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nice :)
--
http://lindsaar.net/
Rails, RSpec and Life blog
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Dave, I am starting to understand better the workflow to adopt
> with cucumber and webrat.
>
> By the way I am having some issues with the: I should see "..." regexp.
> If what I want to see has double quotes or bra
Thanks Dave, I am starting to understand better the workflow to adopt
with cucumber and webrat.
By the way I am having some issues with the: I should see "..." regexp.
If what I want to see has double quotes or brackets, it seems to fail
and not properly detect the string.
--
Posted via http:/
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I was getting a little tired of adding 2 plugins every time I create a
>> new rails project, so I just built an rspec-rails gemspec, and it
>> works perfectly well. Does anybody kno
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Ashley Moran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've been using the Twitter gem, but I discovered it loads ActiveSupport,
> which meddles with Kernel#require and generally causes me confusion and
> pain. I don't need Twitter loaded for my specs, currently I'm doin
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Nick Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-09-28, at 17:20, Nick Hoffman wrote:
>>
>> 431 it 'should hide the map filter errors ' do
>> 432 do_xhr @xhr_params
>> 433 response.should have_rjs
>> 434 # response.should have_
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Juanma Cervera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Craig, but I think I don't understand completely.
>
> "current_user" is a helper method provided by the plugin
> restful_authentication
> to access the @current_user variable as I understand.
> It is defined in lib/
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:10 AM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there a way to skip database initialization? Because it takes too
>> much time to run each test.
> So do you handle data inside the testing environment. Let's say: Given
> there are 2 products available on the site.
>
Thanks Craig, but I think I don't understand completely.
"current_user" is a helper method provided by the plugin
restful_authentication
to access the @current_user variable as I understand.
It is defined in lib/authenticated_system.rb.
We use this helper to access the current logged-in user in t
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you David,
>
> Is there a way to skip database initialization? Because it takes too
> much time to run each test. Is there a similar way to mock objects or
> create objects and have them "saved" in memory? I don't un
I can't tell from your post whether you meant to type an instance or local
variable when noting that you "could check the role of the user in the view
with current_user.role," since you mentioned an instance variable earlier.
assigns[:current_user] = ... sets up an instance variable, @current_user
Well, it seems pretty obvious that I can't use "controller" to mock
controller methods in the view specs, but I was assigning a mock for the
current logged-in user to the @current_user variable and it worked on
rspec 1.1.4
I was doing this:
assigns[:current_user] = stub_model(User, :role => "w
On Sep 29, 2008, at 2:26 AM, Mikel Lindsaar wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:07 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
RSpec-1.1.5 has been released
rspec_team.should_receive(:thank_you).at_least(:once)
GmailMailer.post(email)
class GmailMailer
class << self
def post(email)
Wow, thanks for fast replies!
> rspec-ui is defunct - as far as i am concerned. none seems to be
> maintaining it, and cucumber should replace it.
Yep, feels so.
> I'm not sure I understand what there is to "support" about it. You can
> use anything inside Cucumber step definitions - Cucumber sh
> Is there a way to skip database initialization? Because it takes too
> much time to run each test.
So do you handle data inside the testing environment. Let's say: Given
there are 2 products available on the site.
Currently I am using 1.upto(2) do |i|; Product.create!(:title =>
"title#{i}"..
Priit Tamboom wrote:
Hi!
I'm using cucumber + selenium and I love it. However I'm looking to
add some methods (example: click_and_wait etc) to the lib. Therefore
looked around a bit and I got two questions:
Firstly about rspec-ui, I'm a little confused, does rspec-ui overlap
with its propose wi
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Priit Tamboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm using cucumber + selenium and I love it. However I'm looking to
> add some methods (example: click_and_wait etc) to the lib. Therefore
> looked around a bit and I got two questions:
>
> Firstly about rspec-ui,
I have just installed the edge version of rspec and rspec-rails and some
of my specs related to views now fail.
I use the helper current_user in my views, to access the user that is
actually logged in.
I was simply using the sentence
assigns[:current_user] = stub_model(User,:role => "whatever")
a
Hi!
I'm using cucumber + selenium and I love it. However I'm looking to
add some methods (example: click_and_wait etc) to the lib. Therefore
looked around a bit and I got two questions:
Firstly about rspec-ui, I'm a little confused, does rspec-ui overlap
with its propose with webrat with cucumber
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 09:57 +0200, aslak hellesoy wrote:
>
>
> Try to replace Subject with for="invitation_subject">Subject
> Now both vision impaired people and Webrat know that the text
> "Subject" is linked to the input field. This is much better semantic
> HTML.
Ah, thanks. I'll do that. I
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Willem van den Ende
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Aslak,
>
> thanks for responding (more below).
>
> On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 08:48 +0200, aslak hellesoy wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Willem van den Ende
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2008-09
Hi Aslak,
thanks for responding (more below).
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 08:48 +0200, aslak hellesoy wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Willem van den Ende
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 22:24 +0200, Willem van den Ende wrote:
> >
> >> When I go to invitation/new, I see
38 matches
Mail list logo
