On 2008-09-29, at 07:58, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Nick Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 2008-09-28, at 17:20, Nick Hoffman wrote:
431 it 'should hide the map filter errors <div>' do
432 do_xhr @xhr_params
433 response.should have_rjs
434 # response.should have_rjs(:hide, 'map-filter-errors')
435 end
I just discovered that I need to pass :chained_replace_html to
#have_rjs ,
like so:
response.should have_rjs(:chained_replace_html, :hide, 'map-filter-
errors')
However, after googling around and looking through the source for
#assert_select_rjs , I have no idea what :chained_replace_html
does, nor why
:hide is insufficient. Would someone mind enlightening me?
I'm not sure why that is offhand, still waking up this fine Monday
morning, but I'd recommend throwing this question to the rails mailing
list if nobody responds here.
Cheers,
David
Hi David. I've taken your advice and posted to the ror-talk list:
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk/browse_thread/thread/f7fc3f63660a7f33
I'm not sure what you meant by "why that is offhand"...
Cheers,
Nick
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
