Has anyone looked at hooking up the Story Runner to Autotest?
Currently, the autotest hooks that rspec uses explicitly runs ./script/
spec, which when pointed to a story runner file doesn't do anything.
(In fact, the generated spec.opts has an incompatible --format option
- changing progress
The source of the bug was a patch that we applied a while back. This
was after the 1.1.3 release, so if you're using 1.1.3 you're fine. If
you're using trunk, go ahead and update and you should be fine now.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:31 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found the
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Colin Campbell-McPherson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use task paper and love it. Definitely the fastest way to throw in todo
> items. I wouldn't call the format yaml-ish though. Here's an example:
>
I use Toodledo myself. Works from anywhere, including iPhone,
I found the source of the problem and I'm working on a fix.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:57:32 +0800, Kamal Fariz wrote:
> >
> > I got this too, but didn't bother to find out where and how script/ spec
> > would sneak into the list
Done, thanks everyone.
On 14/02/2008, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Max Williams
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm new to rspec (and coding in general) but would it break a lot of
> > people's tests if redirect_to was changed to do this by
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 5:15 AM, Max Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi David - thanks for replying. The literal doesn't work either, because of
> all the params at the end, and i don't have named routes in this old,
> non-restful app. I see your point about the hash...is there any way to g
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:53:42 +, Steve wrote:
> When I try to run autotest I get the following error:
>
> loading autotest/rails_rspec
> /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:319:in `activate': can't
> activate ZenTest (= 3.7.1), already activated ZenTest-3.9.1]
> (Gem::Exception)
>
> This
When I try to run autotest I get the following error:
loading autotest/rails_rspec
/usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:319:in `activate': can't
activate ZenTest (= 3.7.1), already activated ZenTest-3.9.1]
(Gem::Exception)
This is after just upgrading to the latest of everything from a
pre
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:57:32 +0800, Kamal Fariz wrote:
>
> I got this too, but didn't bother to find out where and how script/ spec
> would sneak into the list of files to test. I got this even if i
> explicitly exclude the file in my .autotest.
>
> The quick and dirty thing I did was:
>
>de
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Mikel Lindsaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have an internal system that has a rails controller action that
> > needs to behave differently based on browser type reported by
> > reques
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Mikel Lindsaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an internal system that has a rails controller action that
> needs to behave differently based on browser type reported by
> request.env['HTTP_USER_AGENT']
>
> But I can't find a way to stub! mock or set this set
I have an internal system that has a rails controller action that
needs to behave differently based on browser type reported by
request.env['HTTP_USER_AGENT']
But I can't find a way to stub! mock or set this setting from within a spec.
Looked through Test::Unit and can't find a straight forward w
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Kamal Fariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Same thing happening here, though I didn't recognize that it's only
> > after failures. The problem continues whether I use .autotest files or
> > not.
> >
> > This is on a Rails 2.0.2 project, with rspec+rspec_on_rails
> Same thing happening here, though I didn't recognize that it's only
> after failures. The problem continues whether I use .autotest files or
> not.
>
> This is on a Rails 2.0.2 project, with rspec+rspec_on_rails r3306 in
> vendor/plugins, and ZenTest 3.9.1 installed as a gem.
I got this too, bu
Hi,
I have been a bad TDD developer and developed before testing. My code is
working fine, but I have been writing tests because it is the right thing to
do. I am running into trouble with some controller methods that are saved in
a separate lib module and included in the application.rb file. I st
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm getting some weird behavior. I'm currently running on trunk rspec/
> rails, with 3.9.1 autotest. If a all tests succeed or are pending,
> autotest just sits there dutifully with the blinking cursor. If an
> example fails, it
I use task paper and love it. Definitely the fastest way to throw in
todo items. I wouldn't call the format yaml-ish though. Here's an
example:
This is a project:
- This is a task @done
- Another Task @context
Another Project:
- Task again
I'm getting some weird behavior. I'm currently running on trunk rspec/
rails, with 3.9.1 autotest. If a all tests succeed or are pending,
autotest just sits there dutifully with the blinking cursor. If an
example fails, it will take a few seconds, and pop up this line:
/usr/bin/ruby1.8 -S script
I don't know exactly how you're using the code, but validates_presence_of
:user_id seems redundant. If you've setup a relationship from Group to User
then Active Record will be enforcing that validation for you. Just a thought
...
Other than that you would probably do (without seeing any of your c
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:32 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Max Williams
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm new to rspec (and coding in general) but would it break a lot of
> > people's tests if redirect_to was changed to do this by defaul
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Max Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm new to rspec (and coding in general) but would it break a lot of
> people's tests if redirect_to was changed to do this by default? It's what
> i expected it to do, personally, that is to pass if the given :action and
I'm new to rspec (and coding in general) but would it break a lot of
people's tests if redirect_to was changed to do this by default? It's what
i expected it to do, personally, that is to pass if the given :action and
:controller match up. If i pass a url string, and it's missing the params,
then
On 2/14/08, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/14/08, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > I don't have t
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/14/08, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 2/14/08, Max Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > > I've been look
Hello there,
I was wondering if anyone had looked at taskpaper? [1] They've got a
vaguely yaml inspired format for todo lists.
It reminded me of specdocs. I wonder how much work it would be to
convert or build it in?
Anyone else interested in seeing this?
http:// Joseph Holsten .com
[1]
On 2/14/08, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/14/08, Max Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I've been looking for documentation for methods for the response
> object, to
> > > get the url, b
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/14/08, Max Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi David - thanks for replying. The literal doesn't work either, because
> of
> > all the params at the end, and i don't have named routes in this old,
> > non-re
perfect - that's the method i was looking for. Thanks!
On 14/02/2008, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/14/08, Max Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi David - thanks for replying. The literal doesn't work either,
> because of
> > all the params at the end, and i don't have
On 2/14/08, Max Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi David - thanks for replying. The literal doesn't work either, because of
> all the params at the end, and i don't have named routes in this old,
> non-restful app. I see your point about the hash...is there any way to get
> the redirected-t
Hi David - thanks for replying. The literal doesn't work either, because of
all the params at the end, and i don't have named routes in this old,
non-restful app. I see your point about the hash...is there any way to get
the redirected-to url from 'response' and test against that? Then i could
s
30 matches
Mail list logo
