On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:32 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Max Williams > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm new to rspec (and coding in general) but would it break a lot of > > people's tests if redirect_to was changed to do this by default? It's what > > i expected it to do, personally, that is to pass if the given :action and > > :controller match up. If i pass a url string, and it's missing the params, > > then it seems fair that it should fail, but if for example i just specify a > > controller, and that controller is called (with any action) i'd expect it > to > > pass as well. > > > > Like i say i'm a newb with no idea of the impact of this to existing tests > > :) > > It is conceivable that existing examples could break, but the docs do > set out the same expectation that you have. > > Can you file a bug at http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com so we can get it > in the queue?
I guess I'll hold off on the patch then. -- Rick DeNatale My blog on Ruby http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
