Yea!
On May 14, 2008, at 3:08PM , Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 02:36:27PM -0400, Gregory Warnes wrote:
> I just committed a change to use R CMD config LAPACK_LIBS. Can you
> check if it behaves properly?
I get the commit emails, so I just hand-applied the changes to the
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 02:36:27PM -0400, Gregory Warnes wrote:
> I just committed a change to use R CMD config LAPACK_LIBS. Can you
> check if it behaves properly?
I get the commit emails, so I just hand-applied the changes to the two files.
Seems to work fine -- i.e. it built. So thumbs up!
I just committed a change to use R CMD config LAPACK_LIBS. Can you
check if it behaves properly?
-G
On May 14, 2008, at 1:14PM , Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 01:06:38PM -0400, Gregory Warnes wrote:
> Too bad.
>
> I guess I'll have to either add code to look for
>
>
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 01:06:38PM -0400, Gregory Warnes wrote:
> Too bad.
>
> I guess I'll have to either add code to look for
>
> libRlapack.so
>
> in the appropriate directory. Know of any simple way to do this?
Glad you asked :) I remembered that 'R CMD ...' added the new command
'co
Too bad.
I guess I'll have to either add code to look for
libRlapack.so
in the appropriate directory. Know of any simple way to do this?
-G
On May 14, 2008, at 10:16AM , Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:08:29AM -0400, Gregory. R. Warnes wrote:
>
> Hi
Hi Greg,
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:08:29AM -0400, Gregory. R. Warnes wrote:
>
> Hi Dirk,
>
> Is it sufficient to simply add lapack to the list of libraries?
>
> libraries=['R','Rlapack','lapack']
Nice idea, but I'm afraid no cigar yet. From a test build I just launched:
[...]
gcc -p
Hi Dirk,
Is it sufficient to simply add lapack to the list of libraries?
libraries=['R','Rlapack','lapack']
-Greg
On May 13, 2008, at 9:38AM , Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Hi Greg,
On 12 May 2008 at 23:54, Gregory. R. Warnes wrote:
| Hi All,
|
| I've just placed RPy 1.0.3 on SourceFor
Hi Greg,
On 12 May 2008 at 23:54, Gregory. R. Warnes wrote:
| Hi All,
|
| I've just placed RPy 1.0.3 on SourceForge. The primary purpose of
| this release is to provide support for R 2.7.0.
Thanks for that.
As with 1.0.2, we need a baby-patch (see below) on Debian. The reason is
that we
Hi All,
I've just placed RPy 1.0.3 on SourceForge. The primary purpose of
this release is to provide support for R 2.7.0.
Sadly, the virtual machine I use for building Windows binary packages
has become corrupted, so that I am unable to build the windows
binary. Can someone else build t
