odd commenting.
This was/should have been corrected in the repository few days ago already.
On 4/14/10 6:18 PM, Peter wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Are these gcc warnings due to a possible error, or just some odd commenting?
>
> rpy/rinterface/na_values.c:206:27: warning: "/*" within comment
> rpy/rinterface/n
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Peter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Peter wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Peter
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> There is no Rinterface.h file under C:\Program
>>> Files\R\R-2.10.1\include (nor C:\Program Files\R\R-2.9.2\include or
>>> C:\Program Files\R
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Peter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Peter wrote:
>>
>> There is no Rinterface.h file under C:\Program
>> Files\R\R-2.10.1\include (nor C:\Program Files\R\R-2.9.2\include or
>> C:\Program Files\R\R-2.8.1\include either).
>>
>
> I thought this seemed fam
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Peter wrote:
>
> There is no Rinterface.h file under C:\Program
> Files\R\R-2.10.1\include (nor C:\Program Files\R\R-2.9.2\include or
> C:\Program Files\R\R-2.8.1\include either).
>
I thought this seemed familiar - Laurent Oget had the same issue with
rpy2 back in
Hi:
Are these gcc warnings due to a possible error, or just some odd commenting?
rpy/rinterface/na_values.c:206:27: warning: "/*" within comment
rpy/rinterface/na_values.c:331:46: warning: "/*" within comment
e.g.
(unaryfunc) NA_unaryfunc, /* nb_positive; */
(unaryfunc) NA_unaryfunc, /* nb_
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Peter wrote:
>
> Any idea how calling "R CMD config --cppflags" behaved? That seems to
> be the stumbling block at the moment and has nothing to do with Python
> or the compiler for rpy2. It could be something funny on my machine...
>
I solved this - R seems to wa
Does the following happen for anyone else?
/space/nsg/8/users> python
Python 2.6.3 (r263:75183, Oct 16 2009, 12:24:10)
[GCC 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-10)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import rpy2.robjects
>>> print rpy2.__version__
2.1.0
On 4/14/10 10:26 AM, Luca Beltrame wrote:
> In data venerdì 9 aprile 2010 16:19:19, Laurent ha scritto:
>
>> Thanks. Glad to read this seems somehow useful.
>
> One question on that: the documentation mentions a "bioc.geoquery" module, but
> this is missing in the distributed tarball. Was that an o
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Luca Beltrame wrote:
> In data venerdì 9 aprile 2010 16:19:19, Laurent ha scritto:
>
>> Thanks. Glad to read this seems somehow useful.
>
> One question on that: the documentation mentions a "bioc.geoquery" module, but
> this is missing in the distributed tarball.
In data venerdì 9 aprile 2010 16:19:19, Laurent ha scritto:
> Thanks. Glad to read this seems somehow useful.
One question on that: the documentation mentions a "bioc.geoquery" module, but
this is missing in the distributed tarball. Was that an oversight, or is it
correct?
Thanks.
--
Luca Be
10 matches
Mail list logo