Revision: 559
http://rpy.svn.sourceforge.net/rpy/?rev=559&view=rev
Author: lgautier
Date: 2008-06-09 22:02:04 -0700 (Mon, 09 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
---
robjects:
- tentative fix of __str__ for win32 (use temp files instead of fifo)
Modified Paths:
--
branch
>I think that RPy is installed and working fine except I cannot get any plots
>to appear.
>
>For example, if I type:
>
from rpy import *
x = r.c(1,2,3,4)
x
>[1, 2, 3, 4]
r.hist(x)
>{'density': [0.499002015, 0.25, 0.24989], 'equidist':
>True, 'breaks': [1.0, 2
Hi,
There an "early alpha" release for a new version of RPy available for download:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=48422&package_id=277454
That version will not overwrite any currently installed RPy-1.x;
trying it is presumably safe and certainly useful if problems,
questio
2008/6/10 Gregory Warnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Well, unless/until we change the implementation, I think the rpy package
> really must match the exact version*s* of R it was compiled againts.
It does, but because I think this is enforced by name mangling of the
C-written python
module rpymodule*
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:41:21PM -0400, Gregory Warnes wrote:
>
> Well, unless/until we change the implementation, I think the rpy
> package really must match the exact version*s* of R it was compiled
> againts.
>
> Note, however, that RPy is designed so that one can compile against
> sev
Well, unless/until we change the implementation, I think the rpy
package really must match the exact version*s* of R it was compiled
againts.
Note, however, that RPy is designed so that one can compile against
several version of R so that a single package can support multiple R
versions
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 12:36:19PM -0400, Gregory Warnes wrote:
> Aside, since rpy _does_ check for specific R versions, would it not be
> advisable for the .deb dependencies to reflect this appropriately?
I tried that for a while but discontinued because it can lead to
upgrade blocks just becau
Thanks Peter, the sf.net news page has been disabled.
On Jun 9, 2008, at 10:05AM , Peter wrote:
I'm confused about why there are two different news pages:
http://rpy.sourceforge.net/news.html
This includes the new wiki announcement and the 1.0.2 release and a
lot of historical entries. Thi
You may find the forumula syntax
y ~ .
helpful. If data= is supplied to the modeling command, the single
period means 'all variables in the data frame that are not
otherwised mentioned.
As for changing he names on an existing object, you can't use the
rownames(x) <- foo syntax
Aside, since rpy _does_ check for specific R versions, would it not
be advisable for the .deb dependencies to reflect this appropriately?
-G
On Jun 8, 2008, at 1:13PM , Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 8 June 2008 at 11:15, Lars Tangvald wrote:
| Laurent Gautier skrev:
| > 2008/6/7 Dirk Edde
2008/6/9 Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:19 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Revision: 558
>> http://rpy.svn.sourceforge.net/rpy/?rev=558&view=rev
>> Author: lgautier
>> Date: 2008-06-08 13:19:00 -0700 (Sun, 08 Jun 2008)
>>
>> Log Message:
>> ---
>> Ve
I'm confused about why there are two different news pages:
http://rpy.sourceforge.net/news.html
This includes the new wiki announcement and the 1.0.2 release and a
lot of historical entries. This seems to be the main news page.
http://sourceforge.net/news/?group_id=48422
This is linked to from t
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:19 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Revision: 558
> http://rpy.svn.sourceforge.net/rpy/?rev=558&view=rev
> Author: lgautier
> Date: 2008-06-08 13:19:00 -0700 (Sun, 08 Jun 2008)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> Version is now 1.0a0 (one-zero-alpha-zero).
Doe
13 matches
Mail list logo
