It will be handled, in time. The v6 spec is but a very early draft at this
point.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2423#issuecomment-1465634375
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID
Note on the
[`dist-hook`](https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/35c62dce0a327600bc0d947a8c01cc649c6e8646/Makefile.am#L289)
target in `Makefile.am` which generates the `ChangeLog` file (when we migrate
this one to cmake):
When checking whether we're in a git checkout, we should use
Closed #2408.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2408#event-8729206542
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-
Reopened #2408.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2408#event-8729323904
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rp
Accidentally closed, sorry about that (one of *those* Mondays it seems)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2408#issuecomment-1465779717
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
This is a nice example of even the most innocuous looking one-liner needing
review...
Py_hash_t was only introduced in Python 3.2, which means we need to bump our
Python requirement for this. 3.2 is old enough that we can just shrug and bump,
but it needs to be documented.
> python/header-py.c
Closed #2408.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2408#event-8730224332
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-
Merged via commit 45103f84764b2a293b068eb0f59456f553ec45d8 with a more
elaborate commit message + Python version requirement updated.
Thanks for the patch!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2408#issuecomment-1465910141
You
This is indeed tricky because the desired flow of overrides is different from
the usual upstream < distro < host < user override order in rpm. What we have
here is something like packager < distro < user - there has to be a way to
locally build and override whatever the packager or distro defaul
@pmatilai approved this pull request.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2406#pullrequestreview-1336774698
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
Looks good!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2421#issuecomment-1466141491
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Merged #2421 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2421#event-8731747212
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint maili
@dmnks pushed 79 commits.
f4400993780890a37ccad9856340946bb7f9b0c5 Generate Python egg-info from
automake builds
6432673bb96761d41905bd741d7028a2d10cba4d Document need to do history research
on behavior changes
ca4406bd3f6793389de8cb1c9982eefeb4e137c9 Add more on pull requests to
CONTRIBUTIN
One last fixup: amend upstream commit e31fb5b75898bfa09180dba02475c6d01764d94f
so that `Home-page` in the newly added `rpm.egg-info.in` is hardcoded (we don't
define `@PACKAGE_URL@` so the field would've been empty).
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-s
Oh, well... Commit e31fb5b75898bfa09180dba02475c6d01764d94f already was on the
`rpm-4.18.x` branch :facepalm: So we need to make the above change a separate
commit.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2406#issuecomment-146623
Merged #2406 into rpm-4.18.x.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2406#event-8732507709
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint m
Given that the `Lead` has been deprecated for so long, is there any reason to
not go ahead and remove the checks now? I can submit a PR.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2423#issuecomment-1466373719
You are receiving thi
> crypto modernization:MD5 and SHA1 dropped everywhere
I assume this would include changing the default file digest algorithm to
something like SHA-256? How about dropping other file digest algos such as
MD2, RIPE160, etc?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://gith
18 matches
Mail list logo
