Re: cost of software.....

1999-03-12 Thread Diffract
The underlying issue here is the marketing and selling of intellectual property paid for by the taxpayer. Everbody knows this but certain people still want to make a dance around it. ICSD as well as ICDD are no charities but package data of the public domain and sell the package with the data at

Re: cost of software.....

1999-03-11 Thread John Faber
Alan: I feel compelled to make several points in connection with the thread concerning database/software costs. As you suggested, it is important to place costs in an accurate context. A new customer license for the PDF-2 is $6,100. But this is only for the first year. ICDD produces updates e

Re: cost of software.....

1999-03-11 Thread Armel Le Bail
Alan Hewat wrote : >I agree that the PDF is too expensive (even tho' ICDD point out that it >is only 6 cents for each of the 115,000 patterns :-) and for that reason >our lab. can't afford it either - but that's our choice too. Not a lot of compounds are synthesized at ILL, which explains that

Re: cost of software.....

1999-03-11 Thread Alan Hewat, ILL Grenoble
Ron, I suspect you are criticising the wrong people when you complain about the high cost of Oxford Cryosystems Search-Match CSM software. CSM apparently uses the ICDD powder diffraction file PDF, the product of another (American) organisation, which is indeed quite expensive. (~$6000 I b