ill.fr] Per conto
> di Apu Sarkar
> Inviato: lunedì 5 maggio 2014 2.48
> A: Tony Wang
> Cc: ILL Forum
> Oggetto: Re: Phase volume fraction
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion.
>
> Yes, I tried scanning the major peak of the second phase with increasing
>
to:rietveld_l-ow...@ill.fr] On Behalf Of
> Kurt Leinenweber
> Sent: 2014年5月4日 6:05
> To: Habib Boughzala; ILL Forum
> Subject: RE: Phase volume fraction
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I think looking at the small diffraction peaks (or bumps) of the
> low-fraction phase,
:59 PM
Subject: Re: Phase volume fraction
Hi Leonid
Everyone says that Rietveld s.u.'s are underestimated. Why is this?
Is there any reference to this?
Cheers,
Martin
On 02.05.2014 09:57, Leonid Solovyov wrote:
Dear Apu,
>
>
>If you use the Rietveld-based QPA you may assess
, Akademgorodok 50/24, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
http://sites.google.com/site/solovyovleonid
***
From: Apu Sarkar
To: "Leoni, Matteo"
Cc: "rietveld_l@ill.fr"
Sent: Friday, May 2, 2014 3:41 AM
Subje
From: rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr [rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr] on behalf of
Suchomel, Matthew R. [sucho...@aps.anl.gov]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 1:57 PM
To: Apu Sarkar
Cc: rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Re: Phase volume fraction
With the appropriate sample and high-resolution synchrotron powder
With the appropriate sample and high-resolution synchrotron powder diffraction
data, you can do even better than 0.1 wt%.
Here at the APS beamline 11-BM, we've managed to perform quantitative
refinements on a suspected very dilute ZrB2 impurity in the NIST SRM LaB6 660a
powder sample, at a lev
Yes, I meant detection limit.
In my sample I have a second phase which dissolves at some
temperature. I tried to identify the dissolution temperature using
XRD. With increasing temperature the peak intensity for the second
phase decreased. After certain temperature the peak disappeared. I
understa
