Re: ITC scattering factors: Table 6.1.1.1: Ne

Ta for that Stephen The sum-of-gaussian parameterisation has to have some data to fit against to get their values, and the IT is kind of the publication of record. I've just requested that edition (I think it's that one) from the library; I've also got some issues with some other elements and the

Re: ITC scattering factors: Table 6.1.1.1: Ne

The 1992 edition lists 2.790 for s = 0.60 and 2.517 for 0.65, so I guess that tells you when the error appeared. On a side note, and at some risk of being flamed, I'm curious why any crystallographer would care. Best to all, Peter ** Peter W. Stephens SUNY Distinguished P

Re: ITC scattering factors: Table 6.1.1.1: Ne

Hi all, same in the 2nd edition (1999). Cheers, Joachim. On 11/04/2023 13:18, Eduard E. Levin wrote: Hi Matthew, I checked 2006 edition (the last available at IUCr), and the value in the table is 2.517 for both s=0.60 and 0.65. Regards, Eduard From: Matthew Rowles

Re: ITC scattering factors: Table 6.1.1.1: Ne

Hi Matthew, I checked 2006 edition (the last available at IUCr), and the value in the table is 2.517 for both s=0.60 and 0.65. Regards, Eduard From: Matthew Rowles Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 2:12 PM To: RIETVELD_L Distribution List Subject: ITC scattering factors: Table 6.1.1.1: Ne Hi a