The 1992 edition lists 2.790 for s = 0.60 and 2.517 for 0.65, so I guess
that tells you when the error appeared.

On a side note, and at some risk of being flamed, I'm curious why any
crystallographer would care.

Best to all,
Peter

**************************
Peter W. Stephens
SUNY Distinguished Professor Emeritus
Department of Physics and Astronomy
Stony Brook University




On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 7:12 AM Matthew Rowles <rowle...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> Does anyone have current/past editions of IT volume C lying around?
> I think there is a typo in the scattering factors for neutral Ne in Table
> 6.1.1.1. I have the 3rd edition (2004)
>
> For s=0.60 and 0.65, the scattering factor is given as 2.517. From Cromer
> & Mann (1968)*, I'd expect the first value to be about 2.787, but the other
> values don't match exactly, either.
>
> Any ideas on what the actual value should be?
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Matthew
>
> *https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/4555098
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com
> >
> Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body
> text
> The Rietveld_L list archive is on
> http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to