Ta for that Stephen
The sum-of-gaussian parameterisation has to have some data to fit against
to get their values, and the IT is kind of the publication of record.
I've just requested that edition (I think it's that one) from the library;
I've also got some issues with some other elements and the
The 1992 edition lists 2.790 for s = 0.60 and 2.517 for 0.65, so I guess
that tells you when the error appeared.
On a side note, and at some risk of being flamed, I'm curious why any
crystallographer would care.
Best to all,
Peter
**
Peter W. Stephens
SUNY Distinguished P
wle...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 2:12 PM
To: RIETVELD_L Distribution List<mailto:rietveld_l@ill.fr>
Subject: ITC scattering factors: Table 6.1.1.1: Ne
Hi all
Does anyone have current/past editions of IT volume C lying around? I think
there is a typo in the scattering factors for n
Hi Matthew,
I checked 2006 edition (the last available at IUCr), and the value in the table
is 2.517 for both s=0.60 and 0.65.
Regards,
Eduard
From: Matthew Rowles
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 2:12 PM
To: RIETVELD_L Distribution List
Subject: ITC scattering factors: Table 6.1.1.1: Ne
Hi
Hi all
Does anyone have current/past editions of IT volume C lying around? I think
there is a typo in the scattering factors for neutral Ne in Table 6.1.1.1.
I have the 3rd edition (2004)
For s=0.60 and 0.65, the scattering factor is given as 2.517. From Cromer &
Mann (1968)*, I'd expect the firs
