Hello François,
With interest I saw your message. My experience with publishing articles
containing crystallography is similar: in most cases they are rejected
already by the editor, without passing through a review. Crystallography
seems to be a negative keyword.
For myself, I've been voting aga
Journals the most frequently chosen for publishing a SDPD, from the beginning up to 2007 :http://www.cristal.org/iniref/journal.html(yes, convincing the referees that this is possible is still difficult ;-)BestArmel
++
Please do NOT atta
Francoise.
It is difficult to know why the reviewers rejected your paper actually
without seeing their remarks, and of course these are confidential.
I think you should point out the difficulty of structure determination from
powders, rather than asking editors and referees for "leniency", which is
Dear Rietveld users,
Quite a strange question : what is the best journal to publish structure
determination from powder ?
I/We are publishing structure determination from now more than 25 years
(see our work below).
But I have the feeling that it is more and more difficult to publish
these
iday, June 2, 2023 at 10:17 AM
To: Rietveld List (rietveld_l@ill.fr)
Subject: [EXTERNAL] How to publish structure determination from powder easily !
Dear Rietveld users,
Quite a strange question : what is the best journal to publish structure
determination from powder ?
I/We are publishing
Dear Rietveld users,
Quite a strange question : what is the best journal to publish structure
determination from powder ?
I/We are publishing structure determination from now more than 25 years
(see our work below).
But I have the feeling that it is more and more difficult to publish
these