Re: GSAS question: Profile function 4 for lab. diffractometers

2006-10-23 Thread Brian H. Toby
To the best of my knowledge there is nothing in Peter Stephen's model for anisotropic strain broadening that is tied to a data collection geometry. It should be appropriate for all types of diffraction data. Brian On Oct 23, 2006, at 5:12 AM, Franz Werner wrote: Is it justified to use GSAS'

GSAS question: Profile function 4 for lab. diffractometers

2006-10-23 Thread Franz Werner
Dear All Is it justified to use GSAS' profile function no. 4 (CW X-ray) in the case of data obtained from a conventional laboratory diffractometer? I.e. is Stephens' approach for aniso. microstrain broadening applicable here? Thank you four your advice. Kind regards Franz Werner Technische Un