Re: GSAS question: Profile function 4 for lab. diffractometers

[Brian H. Toby]

To the best of my knowledge there is nothing in Peter Stephen's model  
for anisotropic strain broadening that is tied to a data collection  
geometry. It should be appropriate for all types of diffraction data.

Brian
On Oct 23, 2006, at 5:12 AM, Franz Werner wrote:

Is it justified to use GSAS' profile function no. 4 (CW X-ray) in  
the case of data obtained from a conventional laboratory  
diffractometer? I.e. is Stephens' approach for aniso. microstrain  
broadening applicable here?