> According to the ccp14 news site the wiki (I guess from apparent lack
> of interest) was recently deactivated after a ccp14 web server upgrade.
In practice, people use whatever is available in the refinement programs
(sometimes blindly :-) The authors of those programs have already spent
conside
Hi,
> I wonder if we should, as a community, put some of this stuff on
> wikipedia, or another such place. In other words, distill the
> community's collective knowledge in a single place that can be updated
> in the future, and also curated for correctness also by the community.
> What a
2/09, Simon Billinge wrote:
> From: Simon Billinge
> Subject: Cagliotti and Other Issues
> To: "rietveld_l"
> Date: Sunday, March 22, 2009, 8:50 PM
> Dear Rietvelders
>
> What is the most complete and authoritative source for
> issues such as
> profile fu
Wikipedia or perhaps publish a paper... :-)
Davor
> -Original Message-
> From: simon.billi...@gmail.com
> [mailto:simon.billi...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Simon Billinge
> Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 2:50 PM
> To: rietveld_l
> Subject: Cagliotti and Other Issues
>
>
-Original Message-
From: May, Frank [mailto:frank.l@umsl.edu]
>My recollection is the Cagliotti function was adapted to the x-ray case when
>we had low resolution x-ray instruments and slow (or no) computers. Now that
>we have high resolution instruments and fast computers, why d
Dear Rietvelders
What is the most complete and authoritative source for issues such as
profile function definitions, what is their scientific basis, and when
are they appropriate to use, etc.? I am guessing there is not
one-stop-shop solution (Young's book? GSAS manual? Rietveld list
archive?
Back to basics and First Principles
As Alan says, the [use of the Cagliotti function is appropriate for the neutron
case], "but not really for X-ray and other geometries."
My recollection is the Cagliotti function was adapted to the x-ray case when we
had low resolution x-ray instruments
