On Tue, 4 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 4/3/00 12:59:08 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> << The maximum count was 17,500 cps and lobes were observed at about 15 cps >>
> This is actually pretty good focussing for powder diffraction application
In a message dated 4/3/00 12:59:08 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< The maximum count was 17,500 cps and lobes were observed at about 15 cps >>
This is actually pretty good focussing for powder diffraction application;
the focal to satellite intensity ratio for this tube h
Hi,
Verification
of tube tails with a single crystal experiment has been obtained: I
called Keith Bowen of Bede on this thread as I thought he would be
interested in this matter and I know he is knowledgeable on electron beam
focusing. [See the Bede web site and look for Microsource.]
H
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000 14:42:31 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>If I were concerned and wanted to measure the tails, I would first make sure
>that they are present. To image the focal line or -spot by pinhole photograph
>is a sensitive test (it is an old trick to quickly find out if you are on a
>
In a message dated 04/03/2000 8:08:36 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< I would like to see (or do) the single crystal experiment in
order to definitively characterize the "tube tails". >>
If I were concerned and wanted to measure the tails, I would first make sure
that
>I would like to see (or do) the single crystal experiment in
>order to definitively characterize the "tube tails". I suspect that the
>answer to the Armel's question is both.
Both ( ? J"org Bergmann does not seem to believe in Kalpha3)
and much more...
Some years ago I put a big muscovite si
Hi,
At 07:31 PM 4/1/00 +0200, you wrote:
> >I'm looking forward for many discussions!
Yep!
>I have some naive questions :
>
>I would like to hear exactly what is on my powder pattern:
> - Kalpha3
> - tube tails
> or both ??
The paper by G. H"olzer et al. (Phys. Rev. A 56 (1997)
